I have a Harmony 676 (now Logitech) that works great with my Tivos. Lots of Harmony fans here.
+1cmonroe said:I've got the Harmony 880, picked it up for $99 on Amazon refurbished. So far its amazing, it does everything I need for my TiVo, TV, DVD, and Speakers.
+1 for the MX-500, great remote that comes amazingly close to the same layout as a TiVo remoteJay M said:My somewhat old MX-500 works very well with the S3. In fact I have never had a device where all of the buttons were so easily learned. I was greatly relieved that it works because 1. I think it's one of the best learning remotes made, and 2. I am able to keep most of the buttons in the same place as they were with our old DVR so it would be a very smooth transition for my wife.
~Jay
The customization possible with JP1 is really pretty amazing.CCourtney said:Atlas-5 DVR Remote using JP1 Programming - Works Great
No blasting, but what can you tweak on the MX-900 that you can't do with the harmony, I'm just curious, I remember those MX remotes from a long time back, never had one but I remeber them being pretty kick ass.gweempose said:I use URC's excellent MX-900 . In my opinion, it's the best hard button based remote on the market. I may get blasted for saying this, but I've never been a huge fan of the Harmony remotes. I can certainly understand their appeal, but I like the ability to be able to tweak every minute detail of my configuration.
While some of the Harmony models are quite capable, they are all wizard based remotes. They are designed for ease of setup, and they accomplish this goal quite well. The MX-900, on the other hand, is specifically aimed at custom installers. Consequently, it offers a tremendous amount of flexibility when it comes to complex setups. You can tweak virtually anything. For example, you can change the order that your equipment powers up, adjust the delay time between individual commands in a macro, and even use nested macros (a macro within a macro). If there is something you want the MX-900 to do, it's just a matter of figuring out how to program the remote to do it. Basically, the sky's the limit.Cyrl said:... what can you tweak on the MX-900 that you can't do with the harmony?
I agree 100% about the MX-900. I used the MX-500 for several years, then moved up to the MX-900 for the computer interface (button editor). I briefly tried the Harmony 880, but wasn't able to get it to control my equipment the way I wanted.gweempose said:I use URC's excellent MX-900 . In my opinion, it's the best hard button based remote on the market. I may get blasted for saying this, but I've never been a huge fan of the Harmony remotes. I can certainly understand their appeal, but I like the ability to be able to tweak every minute detail of my configuration.