[newsposter]

Saw an ad for it in case you are interested.

 

[astrohip]

Doesn't appear to be in HD. :down:

 

[newsposter]

id imagine it would be a better pic than the SD channel though...

 

[bigrig]

So what did I miss?

 

[minorthr]

So what did I miss?

Baby fetishes

 

[Fool Me Twice]

Baby fetishes

That phrase + your avatar = creepy.

 

[cheesesteak]

Is this show still a bunch of strange, unattractive people that I really don't want to see getting busy?

 

[jrinck]

Is this show still a bunch of strange, unattractive people that I really don't want to see getting busy?

Very accurate assessment.

And with the ease of obtaining virtually any kind of porn online, FREE, shows like this just don't provide much excitement.

But if this show was on in 1981, they would have been on to something.

 

[bruab]

That baby fetish episode was very strange to wake up to at 7am.

 

[Ntombi]

Thanks for the info.

I like the show. It's not porn, it's like Dateline Sex, or something along those lines.

One thing that was creepy though: I found out that a casual friend was in one of the episodes. She was one of the participants in a sex party club in NYC. As soon as I was told, I knew exactly what she was talking about, and unbidden images sprung to mind. :down:

Strangers ONLY, please!

 

[Cearbhaill]

Is this show still a bunch of strange, unattractive people that I really don't want to see getting busy?

Yes- and you especially don't want to see them in HD.

 

[mitkraft]

agreed - adult babies=creepy especially when they are all ugly!

The fire part was kinda cool though. That was a little bit hot

 

[bengalfreak]

Maybe I'm weird but I thought a room full of women masturbating for 6 hours straight was extremely hot even if they weren't all good looking.