Did rescan channels? What does zap2it have?
Thanks, I just filled out the form. I will probably call later today. I'm scanning again now because I know they will ask if I did it lately. I don't think Tivo knows that their guide data is aiming incorrectly. They have correct data for the correct stations, but not on the right frequencies.I'm not sure, but does that scenario fit the normal case:
http://www.tivo.com/setupandsupport/contactsupport/lineup_tool.html
I just finished the entire guided channel setup. Nothing changed. There are two 8.1's, two 8.3's. One of each shows the guide, one of each shows a picture. Neither shows both.I gave this some more thought, and I am totally confused. How can a station keep the same channel numbers but change OTA frequency? If it were cable clear QAM, yes that can happen. But OTA?
One more thing you might try if you haven't already - redo guided setup.
Yes, the OTA channel number has no relation to what frequency is involved. Switching over from analog to digital required frequency changes, but the stations considered the channel number part of their branding. So the ATSC standard allows virtual channels. A station's digital broadcast carries its virtual channel number which is picked up during a channel scan, and is used by the device's interface. The device maps that virtual channel to the real frequency.I gave this some more thought, and I am totally confused. How can a station keep the same channel numbers but change OTA frequency? If it were cable clear QAM, yes that can happen. But OTA?
I understand that. What I don't understand is why channel 8 was assigned to frequency 52. The only way this makes any sense at all is if they were originally channel 52.Yes, the OTA channel number has no relation to what frequency is involved. Switching over from analog to digital required frequency changes, but the stations considered the channel number part of their branding. So the ATSC standard allows virtual channels. A station's digital broadcast carries its virtual channel number which is picked up during a channel scan, and is used by the device's interface. The device maps that virtual channel to the real frequency.
Although the deadline of 12/31/2011 was a bit of a surprise, it was known all along that channels 52-69 (700-800MHz) were going to be vacated.
I posted the link that explains the history of the channel and why it has moved around. http://www.kfla.tv/Viewer_Notice_1.htmlI understand that. What I don't understand is why channel 8 was assigned to frequency 52. The only way this makes any sense at all is if they were originally channel 52.
OK, I can think of a way - they never existed as an analog channel and there would only be interference with the San Diego station in analog. So they were assigned to frequency 52 with the understanding that they would have to change frequencies at some point after the digital conversion was complete. I don't know if this is possible from a technical standpoint but it is the only explanation I can come up with.
So basically, the FCC didn't do a very good job of performing the one duty they were created to perform.I posted the link that explains the history of the channel and why it has moved around. http://www.kfla.tv/Viewer_Notice_1.html