it all depends on your needs and the services and options available to you and price etc.As for the focus on streaming... I understand the long term direction is streaming. However having tried it (with DirectTV Now) before I re-committed and upgraded my TiVo, it does not make financial or quality sense, at least today. ... The money you save cutting Cable TV is spent in the increase cost of internet (without bundled TV) + one or more streaming services (Sling is relatively expensive) + surcharges for exceeding 1/2TB internet provider data limits. From my experience the only way to actually save "cutting cable" is cutting out most content, by sharing content accounts with friends and family and/or suffering frustrating downgrades in quality (including buffering, pixelation, dropping audio, unavailable content especially with sports, poor guides, horrible pause/rewind).
But the sad thing is that it didn't have to be, a simple android app tweak to the app they already have built into the stream4K would make it a must have to existing owners and get them in the new ecosystem.it's a pure streaming product. not related to their dvrs.
In addition, the TV 'apps' aren't just Over the Top (OTT) apps that need the higher speed internet.TV content on the TS4K can come from just about any TV streaming app available on the Google Play Store, (Sling, YTTV, Pluto, etc).
A more affordable Mini is not what they were primarily aiming at. If pulling over CableTV, then it is likely either another CableCard ( for a network tuner) or one of that cable operators new IPTV boxes for that use case. (or if it is a "Smart" TV and a cable operator app ... pull it that way).Thank you for that clarification. I was thinking about a Stream 4K on a semi-outdoor TV where I didn't want to set up a mini.
Not sure that is a simple tweak. The app has numerous "download" and "remote control" apsects that probably should be pruned out. If the code was design so that is easily chopped out then it would be easy. If not then there is a problem. The other substantive issue is the the Android app technically just deals with recordings and mandates a transcoder. And the transcode process is aimed at substantially lower bandwidth ( so probably a picture quality hit which is more likely to show up on a larger screen. ).But the sad thing is that it didn't have to be, a simple android app tweak to the app they already have built into the stream4K would make it a must have to existing owners and get them in the new ecosystem.
The underlying hardware is basically the same. The software layered on top is a bit different, but does have same central core.Technically it's not even a new product, just a reskin of the existing slingtv streamer if I remember correctly.
This!Not sure that is a simple tweak. The app has numerous "download" and "remote control" apsects that probably should be pruned out. If the code was design so that is easily chopped out then it would be easy. If not then there is a problem. The other substantive issue is the the Android app technically just deals with recordings and mandates a transcoder. And the transcode process is aimed at substantially lower bandwidth ( so probably a picture quality hit which is more likely to show up on a larger screen. ).
A modern WiFi 5 or WiFI 6 ( 802.11 ac or ax ) network and passing around MPEG2 files probably wouldn't be a problem, but the Android/iOS apps aren't really set up to do that.
The underlying hardware is basically the same. The software layered on top is a bit different, but does have same central core.
Actually, it is mostly a UI issue. Have you sideloaded and used it with a mouse? It works and the PQ is fairly good. Maybe not the same original quality as a mini would produce, but then again it didn't cost the same as a new mini.This!
The countless "it works on my 6" phone so it has to be just a simple tweak here and there to get the app to work on my 65" tv" posts are really clueless.
Sorry but I disagree on the clueless implication, I know what's involved, and I know it's not "and change this one line of code"This!
The countless "it works on my 6" phone so it has to be just a simple tweak here and there to get the app to work on my 65" tv" posts are really clueless.
How do you know they haven't even attempted it?Sorry but I disagree on the clueless implication, I know what's involved, and I know it's not "and change this one line of code"
The point is they have an an android app and existing proven code to access the DVRs, integrating that into this "new" product while costing them time and money gives them a huge market of existing users that are now in the new ecosystem, but by not even attempting it this new streaming device might as well come from SlingTV as opposed to Tivo, there's very little added Tivo brand value.
It's like when I was stumbling around the SSD market and found a Kodak branded 2.5" SSD, someone just slapped a name on it, there's no actual market or customer base involved.
All I know is that it's not there, and they have given no intention of adding it.How do you know they haven't even attempted it?
The CEO has mentioned the possibility of adding DVR playback and others have reported recent surveys sent have inquired about the addition of such a feature.All I know is that it's not there, and they have given no intention of adding it.
Heck just the fact that it's not even their OWN PRODUCT and just a reskinned product from someone else makes it lose a few points for me.
Their latest model came out literally 8-9 months ago. Perhaps as someone on this forum you've heard of it.Is Tivo even making DVRs anymore? Seems like they are moving to software and streaming.
It's not "less than a month old" it's an existing AirTV mini that was released last summer that they reskinned and added an app to, this one isn't rocket since and isn't even their product, this is a few bucks to keep the doors open, it's not a shift to make the business profitable in a new direction.The CEO has mentioned the possibility of adding DVR playback and others have reported recent surveys sent have inquired about the addition of such a feature.
So for a product less than a month old for you to say they "have given no intention" of adding it I think is very unfair.
Again, the product is LESS THAN A MONTH OLD and you're looking for statements from them about adding a major feature that would fundamentally change the entire value proposition of the device.
Maybe it'll happen, maybe it won't but by God, give them some time.
Yep I've heard of it. I've also heard that they stop making them too. That's why I asked.Their latest model came out literally 8-9 months ago. Perhaps as someone on this forum you've heard of it.