Joined
·
391 Posts
So the Eugenics War only had a study commissioned in the 1990's and hasn't happened yet?
I was wondering the same, from the ST:TOS the war was between 1992 and 96.So the Eugenics War only had a study commissioned in the 1990's and hasn't happened yet?
Ok, that matches what I found on some Fandom pages, but the war to oust Khan (which was about Eugenics) ended in 1996 and that year Khan and is crew departure Earth. The other enhanced people of the time were either killed or confined. The Eugenics war aka Second civil war aka WWIII was (will be) in 2026.I got the impression it was already starting to happen (as the Second Civil War), but wouldn't actually be called The Eugenics War until later...
Considering they're an offshoot of Vulcans, and have green blood (copper based I think) I find that unlikely.Re: #2, yeah, I also wondered that but figured maybe Romulan physiology was close enough? Maybe that's enough to explain it away?
Then again, considering Vulcans and Humans can interbreed...Considering they're an offshoot of Vulcans, and have green blood (copper based I think) I find that unlikely.
Then again, considering Vulcans and Humans can interbreed...
There was a TNG episode where it’s discovered that all species in the galaxy were seeded by an alien race and share some DNA. That somewhat explains why all aliens look similar and likely why they can interbreed.Yeah that always bothered me. We don't really know what it took for Sarek and Amanda to conceive Spock. I always thought it was some kind of in vitro fertilization. But who knows?
[/URL]
I do remember that episode. But the science geek in me still doesn't like it.There was a TNG episode where it’s discovered that all species in the galaxy were seeded by an alien race and share some DNA. That somewhat explains why all aliens look similar and likely why they can interbreed.
#1: would Seven & Picard gave been assimilated given the new version of the Borg? I know this is a new timeline, but over the 400 years, when did changes take place? How would it affect 1st Contact and Data?
I don’t like that Q simply willed a new timeline into existence and replaced the old one with the new one at the exact instance that the rift opened, but that seems to be what happened. Especially since Elenor never joined a ship crew, but suddenly he was an ensign on a ship.No, it's still the same timeline.
Like it or not, Q apparently set up a Pre-destination Paradox so everything that happened to Picard and Seven had to have happened, otherwise they couldn't have done what they did in the past.
The big change of course, is that Rios disappeared.
(Does this episode mean that Seven is the commanding officer of the Stargazer?
Those were Borg drones. There’s never been a separate collective with its own queen. I don’t think there can be two queens, which makes me wonder what happened to the original Borg queen when Jurati queen made her way to the Delta quadrant.Also, we have seen Borg splinters before.
Lore and his group, Hugh and his group, the Unimatrix Zero Group, and the Cooperative Collective that Voyager ran into.
Elnor was always on the Excelsior.I don’t like that Q simply willed a new timeline into existence and replaced the old one with the new one at the exact instance that the rift opened, but that seems to be what happened. Especially since Elenor never joined a ship crew, but suddenly he was an ensign on a ship.
AgQueen may have done some time traveling herself but she still would have needed some time to build her own ship and collective.Wasn’t it stated that the rift was a temporal one? It would make more sense if Jurati Queen wasn’t several hundred years old and had traveled from the past.
I guess the Stargazer crew didn't think much of Rios.As for Rio he simply vanished. One of his crew asked where he was, but no one seemed too concerned he was missing not did they question when Picard made Seven captain (even though she’s not even in Starfleet).
That we know of.Those were Borg drones. There’s never been a separate collective with its own queen. I don’t think there can be two queens, which makes me wonder what happened to the original Borg queen when Jurati queen made her way to the Delta quadrant.
Miles O'Brien said:I hate Temporal Mechanics.
From that article:Yeah that always bothered me. We don't really know what it took for Sarek and Amanda to conceive Spock. I always thought it was some kind of in vitro fertilization. But who knows?
Here's an interesting review of the finale. I'm not sure if I agree with all of it, but there's some validity in it.
![]()
'Star Trek: Picard' Says "Farewell" to Its Potential
It's the season 2 finale of Star Trek: Picard. What is everyone's fate? Will any of it make sense? And how does this lead into season 3?www.belloflostsouls.net
The Raffi/Seven kiss definitely surprised me. I didn't see it coming. It seemed like they just threw that in there for shock value. I saw the Raffi/Seven subplots as their buddy movie subplot not as a preliminary courtship.Back at Chateau Picard, the team prepares to live the rest of their lives in the 21st century. This includes Raffi and Seven kissing after an entire season of build-up.
Well, let's be honest...in a society that largely accepts the Christian notion of an all-powerful, all-knowing God, that's pretty standard fare...Q engineering the entire plot of this season simply to make Picard accept his past and to move on made little sense to me in retrospect. Q could have just snapped his fingers and achieved the same result. Even the unexpected result of Jurati becoming the Borg Queen and a potential Federation ally could have been accomplished with a snap of his fingers.
That's what I was alluding to but avoided explicitly stating.Well, let's be honest...in a society that largely accepts the Christian notion of an all-powerful, all-knowing God, that's pretty standard fare...
Just a side note here... the belief of a omniscient entity of some sort is not just a christian belief. Both Buddhism and Hinduism also have 'all knowing' 'all universal' beliefs as well. Just sayin....That's what I was alluding to but avoided explicitly stating.