Both drives combined are only 460GB. That seems like a waste since 500GB drives are under$100. By having two drives that will be married it doubles your chance for problems. If one drive dies you lose everything.
You can pick up a 750 gb yourself for under 200 and use winmfs to load it.bronson said:Thanks for your reply Aaron.
The TiVo HD can only take TiVo ready drives, and I don't have SATA ports on my PC mobo to do the mirroring of the native TiVo drive to the blank drive. The weaknees 300 GB drive at $169 was a better buy than their 500 GB for $300. If I knew an easy way to mirror, I would have picked up a cheap blank 500 GB drive.
One add'l concern is that both drives would lose their formatting somewhow with the 2 married, and lacking SATA ports that I might not be able to reconfigure them. Would this be a risk?
Thanks,
Brian
I guess this may be too late for your situation .. but in case it can help others heading down the same path.bronson said:The TiVo HD can only take TiVo ready drives, and I don't have SATA ports on my PC mobo to do the mirroring of the native TiVo drive to the blank drive.
Sweet! That will make things easier. Is it still just as fast copying a drive when using this adapter? I could have used this a month ago.MirclMax said:I guess this may be too late for your situation .. but in case it can help others heading down the same path.
I just recently picked up a USB --> SATA Adapter to handle my drive upgrade . $13 from Newegg http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16812186020
Was able to do Winmfs stuff right off of my laptop.
Good luck to you on this.
No, SATA is many times faster. It is quite acceptable with USB2.0, almost unbearable with USB1.1 but since it is a one time thing it doesn't really matter.aaronwt said:...is it still just as fast copying a drive when using this [USB-to-SATA] adapter?
Yeah, what I said is a little misleading in that no hard drive made can use of the bandwidth of SATA 1.5 Gbit/s let alone the newer 3 Gbit/s version. So the SATA bus is many times faster than USB 2.0 but the real-world performance is not. USB 2.0 is a bottleneck but only by about half of what a modern fast drive such as a Raptor can sustain.aaronwt said:I was just wondering. My USB drives are just about as fast as the internal drives when I copy content. I didn't know if this interface slowed things down any.
Yes, that was based on a truncated backup.mattack said:I presume you mean backup *without* keeping the shows?
Pre-formatted drives sold by Weaknees and others are meant to replace the internal drive only. IMO if you're replacing the original internal drive with the Weaknees pre-formatted drive (recommended) you should set your original drive aside as a backup.bronson said:Thanks for everyone's help.
Last question. I posted this same thread at weaknees forums, where a weakness tech support guy told me there his drive wouldn't work externally with case and SATA cable.
Is this true? Could I damage either drive when attempting to marry the two before recording any content on them?
Thanks
Only in one way is it true. You actually need an eSATA cable. With that then no problem. No damage will occur. But as richadams said, you would be treating your new pre-configured internal drive like a bare external drive, overwriting the pre-configured drive contents you paid a premium for. If you are planning to use both of the drives and not buy a larger single bare drive then it doesn't make a whole lot of difference which one you put internally except that keeping the original drive internal (or archived on a shelf somewhere) will make future upgrades easier. If money is not an object then just start over with the biggest bare drive you can afford and put it internal. Read the threads richadams pointed to and go from there.bronson said:...a weakness tech support guy told me there his drive wouldn't work externally with case and SATA cable.
Is this true? Could I damage either drive when attempting to marry the two before recording any content on them?