RS4 said:
"And maybe if you visited over there you'd see *plenty* of posts about the HR20 vs. Tivo vs. Cable DVR vs. Dish DVR."
Absolutely, I agree with Scott on that!! Research the other forums and the internet. See how other people feel about the box. You'll find just as many people over there saying they wished they didn't have to use the HR20 - especially the Tivo owners. Remember, the dbstalk forum is for people who own the box or are interested in it so you expect a great deal of bias just as we are biased here for the Tivo. But, it doesn't take a lot of reading over there to find that a lot of folks don't like it and would prefer to have stayed with the Tivo.
Why do you feel the need to constantly reply to every post about the HR20 with the sentiment that the HR20 is a piece of crap?
It doesn't take a lot of reading here to find people who are unhappy with their TiVos, but what does that have to do with the overall quality of the DVR?
The HR20 in use TODAY (and that's all that matters - TODAY) is a high-quality DVR. The first rollout had problems, and that's big in a lot of people's minds, but people using the HR20 TODAY will not have those problems as the early users.
Now read this next sentence out loud:
The
Series 3 is a high-quality DVR enjoyed by thousands of happy
TiVo customers, even though based on threads at
TCF there are some customers who have experienced lost recordings or other problems with their DVRs.
Now read it again:
The
HR20 is a high-quality DVR enjoyed by thousands of happy
DIRECTV customers, even though based on threads at
DBSTalk there are some customers who have experienced lost recordings or other problems with their DVRs.
Does either sentence mean either DVR is crap? No! So get off it already! You don't like that HR20 and that's your right, but it's wrong to to complain when someone corrects misinformation about the HR20 and refers further discussion to DBSTalk. At least that's what it seems like is happening to me every time the HR20 comes up here.