My love of this show is falling quickly.
correction, in 2 weeks.scottykempf said:"
Next week:Is that the foreign chick that was one of the doctors? Looks like her.
Oooh, House's trip to the other side, and the patient from this week "appearing" to the lady next week. Cool. "He says you killed his dog."
HA. Only they're not Slayers. I like it.LoadStar said:I hope they resolve this nonsense fairly quickly, because it's getting a bit like seventh season Buffy, with all the potentials running around. Too many people, not enough decent writing and plot development.
When they were giving the ivermectin, I mentioned to Roger that that is a drug that you can't give to collies, and told him about a vet I know that did give it and killed the dog. I also pointed out that she didn't watch the patient take the med when the guys came in and started testing...only because that's a big nursing error. It also helps having a vet and vet tech in the family.On the other hand: House knowing right off the top of his head about MDR1 gene defect in collies leading to abnormal sensitivity to ivermectin? Please. Unless he practices veterinary medicine on the side, or has a photographic memory and a subscription to the Journal of Veterinary Medicine in his office, I highly doubt that he'd know about that.
Ditto (the vet tech part, at least.)stargazer21 said:It also helps having a vet and vet tech in the family.
House has to have a photographic memory besides being incredibly observant and deductive. And would anyone be surprised if he has a subscription to Journal of Veterinary Medicine?LoadStar said:On the other hand: House knowing right off the top of his head about MDR1 gene defect in collies leading to abnormal sensitivity to ivermectin? Please. Unless he practices veterinary medicine on the side, or has a photographic memory and a subscription to the Journal of Veterinary Medicine in his office, I highly doubt that he'd know about that.
The doctor put the pills down on the tray in front of the patient, and went to get some water. Meanwhile, the male team came in, pushed the tray aside, started various tests, and pushed out the doctor who'd given the pills. I guess the patient just forgot about them in the confusion. I noticed at the time that he didn't seem to have taken the pills, but I didn't make the connection until the reveal.zuko3984 said:If the dog got the pills wouldn't the patient know they didn't take the pills and say something.
Actually I think that's very realistic - firing someone who doesn't follow hospital policy and thereby endangers a patient's life would seem to me to be a "must fire" offense. Your sense of realism has probably been skewed by the fact that House pulls so much crap week after week and doesn't get fired - now THAT'S ridiculous.LoadStar said:I could have cared less about Foreman's plotline.... and the whole thing was SO anvil-icious it's not even funny. Plus, firing Foreman after one incident? Would they really up and fire a head of a department that quickly, except in the case of SEVERE medical malpractice leading to death? That was a bit ridiculous. (Even then, there would be the whole morbidity and mortality stuff that you'd have to go through first.)
Well it's pretty clear by now that the old team will be a part of this entire season in some fashion, so it's hardly surprising that they're writing them in. I did like the "I could get you fired ... I thought you did get me fired ... proving that I can" scene.LoadStar said:Plus, featuring the old team in this episode just seemed SO forced, like the writers said "oh, crap, WE'VE BEEN FOUND OUT! Now we have to go and write them into this show, now that the viewers have discovered they're still on!"
That really didn't make any sense whatsoever that he kept the screw-up. The only explanation is that she's hot and mysterious.betts4 said:The part with #13 not being fired was interesting
Thanks I must have missed that. So then i would say it's really house's fault for making them compete to see who would cure the patient first.wmcbrine said:The doctor put the pills down on the tray in front of the patient, and went to get some water. Meanwhile, the male team came in, pushed the tray aside, started various tests, and pushed out the doctor who'd given the pills. I guess the patient just forgot about them in the confusion. I noticed at the time that he didn't seem to have taken the pills, but I didn't make the connection until the reveal.
I think he kept her because he was as much to blame if not more so for the patients death. Sure she made a mistake but that mistake wouldn't have been made if House didn't turn the patients care into a competition for a job.Bananfish said:That really didn't make any sense whatsoever that he kept the screw-up. The only explanation is that she's hot and mysterious.
Cuddy made the point that treating the patient is not a contest. House put the teams competing against each other. Plus, he was lying in a hospital bed because of the whole knife+outlet thing when the patient died. So it was directly his fault that the guy died.zuko3984 said:Thanks I must have missed that. So then i would say it's really house's fault for making them compete to see who would cure the patient first.
I honestly can't remember. Did she say "I used to be a vet" or "I used to work for a vet"?LoadStar said:Plus, the whole fellowship candidate formerly being a vet? Please. That's 8 years of school right there to become a vet, then graduating and suddenly deciding "oh, CRAP! What am I doing here? I didn't want to do this! I must've enrolled in the wrong school!" and going back for a medical degree? And seriously - does she REALLY look old enough to have gone through undergrad and graduate school to become a vet, then gone back and taken ANOTHER 4-6 years or more of medical school and residency?