In the past both recordings would have ended
Tivo has updated it so now, both tuners will change and record the emergency alert, then change back continuing to record.
If your box is in standby, it will ignore the alert all together.
In the past both recordings would have endedJust had a playback interrupted by that emergency alert notice (First one, I'm surprised). Nothing was recording at the time, but I'm wondering, if both tuners HAD been recording something, what would happen (If neither were recording the channel the alert came on)? Would the programs continue recording, or would 1 get hijacked for the notice?
Who's IDIOTIC idea was this? Tivo? Cable company? Interrupting a recording because of this is NOT ACCEPTABLE to me!In the past both recordings would have ended
Tivo has updated it so now, both tuners will change and record the emergency alert, then change back continuing to record.
If your box is in standby, it will ignore the alert all together.
Federal government.Who's IDIOTIC idea was this? Tivo? Cable company? Interrupting a recording because of this is NOT ACCEPTABLE to me!
We live in a nanny state, we can't even be trusted to change channels on our own televisions.Federal government.
If neither tuner was recording the channel where the alert occurred, how would the TiVo even know about it? Surely it must be received via a tuner.In the past both recordings would have ended
Tivo has updated it so now, both tuners will change and record the emergency alert, then change back continuing to record.
If your box is in standby, it will ignore the alert all together.
I'd like to request legislation to outlaw VCRs, blu-ray players, and video games, as these devices lack the capability to tune to the emergency notice and may hijack a television, preventing government control. These dangerous appliances should be confiscated, for the good of the people. The current job crisis could be averted by hiring inspectors to search households for these hazardous entertainment devices.
While we are on the subject, how about those amber alerts and also those severe weather superimpositions done by the local news channels. I sometimes watch recorded content that is weeks old and I have to watch 3 hours of high pollen and wind advisories scrolling across the screen that is days or weeks old.If neither tuner was recording the channel where the alert occurred, how would the TiVo even know about it? Surely it must be received via a tuner.
The proper way for a DVR to handle emergency alerts would be to superimpose the alert text and audio onto its output (HDMI, component, whatever) so that the viewer could see it immediately in real time even if he's playing a recording. There is obviously no point in recording the alert to the HDD, since there's a good chance no one will see it there until it's ancient history. Would this be possible, or is the alert already imbedded in the video data? Is it time to design a new emergency alert system that allows for time-shifting?
How would Tivo do this without a third tuner? Or, do you expect them to add an additional tuner that is just used for this? Currently, the Tivo doesn't know if you are using it or not, unless it is in standby. So that is the only way it can determine if is should give out the emergency alert or not.The proper way for a DVR to handle emergency alerts would be to superimpose the alert text and audio onto its output (HDMI, component, whatever) so that the viewer could see it immediately in real time even if he's playing a recording. There is obviously no point in recording the alert to the HDD, since there's a good chance no one will see it there until it's ancient history. Would this be possible, or is the alert already imbedded in the video data? Is it time to design a new emergency alert system that allows for time-shifting?
I don't know exactly how the emergency alerts work, but they surely can detect an alert only if a tuner is tuned to the station broadcasting it. Even if you're watching live TV on the other tuner, you would probably miss the alert the way it works now. If TiVo can ignore alerts in standby mode, then surely it can avoid embedding them in video sent to the hard drive. Something is always being sent out on the video output ports (except in standby mode), so the alert should just be superimposed over that, whether it's live TV or a recording being played back or even a menu.How would Tivo do this without a third tuner? Or, do you expect them to add an additional tuner that is just used for this? Currently, the Tivo doesn't know if you are using it or not, unless it is in standby. So that is the only way it can determine if is should give out the emergency alert or not.
It's not a question of government's right to do something; it's a question of what makes sense. All of those warnings need to be seen in a timely manner, not several days later when all they do is ruin a recording. They're not very important as history.Also, I disagree with some in this thread that say the government has no right to hijack broadcasts for these alerts. I have been just as annoyed at times as everyone else, but, the information in these alerts can be important. Weather warnings, Amber Alerts, these aren't trivial things.
Let's see here...Who's IDIOTIC idea was this? Tivo? Cable company? Interrupting a recording because of this is NOT ACCEPTABLE to me!
Sorry, you got the wrong coast.Let's see here...
If I had a choice of being alerted to a tornado ripping through our county or catching the last minutes of Modern Family, I might want to go with the alert.
Maybe you should realize people other than the west cost of Oregon have actual emergencies other than vampires from Forks, Washington. /arshe![]()