Agatha Mystery said:I found the bride annoying and grating. I was glad she didn't choose to travel with the Doctor.
Did you have your full KKK gear on when you posted this?PhillyJimbo said:I hate...
Inter-racial relationships are much more common in the UK than they are here. That whole slavery issue and second class citizen thing that we had had a tendency to put a damper on them around here.PhillyJimbo said:I hate all the inter-racial romance in the new series. It's like the BBC has an agenda and they're ramming it down our throats no matter how much it gags us.
I don't know how much more I can take before I stop watching it altogether.
Yes, I've noticed that British TV is far more casual about inter-racial relationships than American TV, where until recently any inter-racial relationship tended to be a Big Event. Lately, American TV has gotten a lot better at both having non-white characters, and having them interact with white characters in ways that have nothing to do with color, but that only means that it's now bad instead of terrible; we still have a LONG way to go before we catch up with the British on this front.Agatha Mystery said:Inter-racial relationships are much more common in the UK than they are here. That whole slavery issue and second class citizen thing that we had had a tendency to put a damper on them around here.![]()
I didn't enjoy the episode because that's all I was worried about...she was awful...all I kept thinking was "please don't let this woman be his companion!"...Agatha Mystery said:I found the bride annoying and grating. I was glad she didn't choose to travel with the Doctor.
Tegan Jovanka was a Davison-era companion who could also be annoying and grating, although less so than Donna. In Donna's defense, much of her annoyingness was because she was upset at having been plucked from her own wedding -- I can't imagine many brides taking such an event casually!cheesesteak said:I really liked the bride and was hoping she'd be a companion. Yes, she was annoying and grating, but she was supposed to be. It would have worn off to some extent pretty soon.
I thought her acting was deliberately over-the-top, I but agree that whatever effect she was trying for, it didn't work.7thton said:I thought this was the WORST Dr. Who episode I have ever seen. The spider-woman's make-up and the general effects were terrible, as was the acting.
Dude, whatever you do, never watch Torchwood!PhillyJimbo said:I hate all the inter-racial romance in the new series. It's like the BBC has an agenda and they're ramming it down our throats no matter how much it gags us.
I don't know how much more I can take before I stop watching it altogether.
Maybe he has a pet frog in his pocket. Either that or he's royalty.jmoak said:Dude, whatever you do, never watch Torchwood!
just out of curiosity, who is "us"?
The major reason probably is because the TARDIS is not 100% accurate as to when it lands. To avoid landing in a timeline where they already are, which might result in a paradox and trigger the Blinovitch Limitation Effect, they deliberately shoot to land some random amount of time "after" (in normal time) they leave.hapdrastic said:So, Doctor Who-related time travel question:
They're in "the present", then travel into the past (in this case, to the formation of the Earth) and spend some time there. When they then travel back to "the present", why has time passed? Why not just return to the exact moment they left? Does time continue to "flow" and the TARDIS can only enter into the timeline with the same amount of time relative to what they'd just spent elsewhere? (That sentence makes no sense). I'd expect more of a Bill and Ted-style time travel where:
(do I really need to spoil this?)
In Bogus Journey, they travel somewhere in time, spend several months learning how to not suck at being musicians then come back after just a few seconds of "our" time.
I'm just curious what the "rules" are in the Doctor's universe.