Joined
·
90 Posts
Most or almost all of the TiVo alternatives I read about have Over the Air as the source. Are there any good alternative DVRs that support cable card instead of over the air?
Hi mdavej - Please tell us what streaming service with an unlimited cloud DVR you are using - I'm planning to switch and have been shopping around.Depending on your cable system and the kinds of things you record, you may be able to get by without being able to record copy protected channels. Off the top of my head, I know FIOS and Spectrum protect few channels besides premiums and sports. For premiums, you can usually get just about everything on demand, so no need to record. In that case, any software DVR that works with the HD HomeRun Prime or older Ceton InfiniTV devices will work. See the second table below and look for at least partial cable card support. In addition, Silicon Dust has its own really terrible but functional DVR software. There's also "Channels" and "Google Live Channels". I've use the latter with HomeRun tuners successfully. "Channels" can do a lot without a cable card because it can record on demand using your TV Everywhere login. It's probably the best software DVR out there at the moment, but it does have a fee, unlike most of the others. You get what you pay for.
Comparison of DVR software packages - Wikipedia
Personally, I've switched to a streaming service with an unlimited cloud DVR. Much cheaper and simpler than traditional cable card solutions and whatever Rube Goldberg system you'd have to use in place of Tivo. This is coming from a guy who ran a whole home Windows Media Center solution for several years before switching to Tivo for a few years.
Realize that all streaming services, even ones with unlimited cloud DVR, don't keep recordings forever. But mine, YTTV, keeps them the longest - 9 months. The runner up, AT&T TV, keeps them only 3 months and costs almost twice as much.Hi mdavej - Please tell us what streaming service with an unlimited cloud DVR you are using - I'm planning to switch and have been shopping around.
- Thanks Much !!
Charter (branded as Spectrum) is all over the place regarding protected path required content. They mostly left whatever requirements existed when they acquired the franchise, and the largest (by a large percentage) of acquisitions was TWC, which is 100% protected path required (except for the OTAs), so location, location, and of course location. Comcast, on the other hand, is pretty much all copy-freely except for the premiums.Off the top of my head, I know FIOS and Spectrum protect few channels besides premiums and sports.
Nice comparisonRight now, because of the watching we do (including a focus on the hallmark channel, especially around the holidays), Comcast is still a tad cheaper for us than the alternative of Burlington Telecom. Yes, there clearly are benefits of fiber (including synchronous up/down, etc) but our comcast has been stable. Now, if Comcast were to up fees even more, or if TiVo/CableCards/etc were to go away or stop being supported, etc., then we clearly would jump right to BT, with YTTV and FrndlyTV to get the Hallmark channels.....
View attachment 57500
That's the exact kind of comparison I would do too. But shouldn't the right-side column, where you switch to BT plus streaming TV, include the money you could get from selling your TiVo Bolt (with a 2 TB hard drive!) and TiVo Mini Vox, both of which have lifetime service? The Bolt should fetch $300 or more on eBay while the Mini Vox should bring about $125. Even after transaction fees and shipping costs, you could reasonably expect to bring in around $350 on those two items. If you averaged that out over, say, the next 24 months, that would bring down the right column monthly total to just $109.54, which is less than you're paying to stick with Comcast + TiVo. You'd be getting better FTTH internet and TV service that is in most ways better than Comcast (although with a cloud DVR that is, in some ways, inferior to TiVo).Right now, because of the watching we do (including a focus on the hallmark channel, especially around the holidays), Comcast is still a tad cheaper for us than the alternative of Burlington Telecom. Yes, there clearly are benefits of fiber (including synchronous up/down, etc) but our comcast has been stable. Now, if Comcast were to up fees even more, or if TiVo/CableCards/etc were to go away or stop being supported, etc., then we clearly would jump right to BT, with YTTV and FrndlyTV to get the Hallmark channels.....
View attachment 57500
Yeah, I guess there are still a few markets here and there where AT&T TV is missing one of the big 4 locals. But in most places now, they have the locals for ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox. And in lots of places The CW and/or My Network TV too. My guess is that it's just a matter of time until your local NBC station gets added. But in the meantime, that's certainly a reason to stay away. (Although if you happen to have Hulu or Peacock Premium, then you get just about all NBC primetime shows available for streaming next-day. But that still doesn't give you NBC live sports, news or local content.)Also, I just looked at AT&T TV's website and it does not include all of the locals. I have CBS AA/Paramount which would cover CBS, but it just seems weird to not have them all. It's pretty close to cost of YTTV in the long run.
Yeah, locals are my only major complaint about ATT TV in Chicago. We've got 2-5-7-32-50 (CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, MNT) but no CW (26) or WGN (9).Yeah, I guess there are still a few markets here and there where AT&T TV is missing one of the big 4 locals. But in most places now, they have the locals for ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox. And in lots of places The CW and/or My Network TV too. My guess is that it's just a matter of time until your local NBC station gets added. But in the meantime, that's certainly a reason to stay away. (Although if you happen to have Hulu or Peacock Premium, then you get just about all NBC primetime shows available for streaming next-day. But that still doesn't give you NBC live sports, news or local content.)
Do you get PBS (WTTW)?Yeah, locals are my only major complaint about ATT TV in Chicago. We've got 2-5-7-32-50 (CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, MNT) but no CW (26) or WGN (9).
Well, that and the DVR listing not remembering where I left it and returning to the top every time.
With these OTT streaming cable TV services, they have to have an agreement in place with the station owner group specifically for their stations affiliated with each particular national network. For instance, our local ABC station here in Nashville is owned by Nexstar, a big group that has lots of local stations across the country. AT&T TV didn't add our local ABC until they struck a deal with Nexstar to carry all their ABC affiliate stations. And then they had to strike separate deals to carry Nexstar-owned affiliates of CBS, NBC, etc.Yeah, locals are my only major complaint about ATT TV in Chicago. We've got 2-5-7-32-50 (CBS, NBC, ABC, Fox, MNT) but no CW (26) or WGN (9).
Well, that and the DVR listing not remembering where I left it and returning to the top every time.