TiVo Community Forum banner

Buffy / Angel / Firefly

2357 Views 41 Replies 22 Participants Last post by  Langree
How come there is nothing like these shows on? Why can't anyone else but Joss Whedon write like this?

I was watching some episode of Angel yesterday and it just reminded me of this big hole in my tv watching...
1 - 20 of 42 Posts
Smart intelligently written TV seems to be dying, in favor of cheap to produce reality and game shows. The Angel finale was on TNT this morning. It certainly was good TV.
Buffy / Angel / Firefly

Yes/Yes/Yes
Gunnyman said:
Smart intelligently written TV seems to be dying, in favor of cheap to produce reality and game shows. The Angel finale was on TNT this morning. It certainly was good TV.
Disagree. It was barely alive before, and now is starting to come into its own, just not on broadcast tv as much. Before, in the ages of Buffy, it was sort of like a little single-celled organism floating in proto goo. It evolved into a frog and jumped over to FX, Showtime, HBO, and maybe USA and that fringe is the only place it can survive. Natural selection and what not. Frogs that have tried to survive in that proto goo (Firefly, Veronica Mars, etc.) have all been destroyed by bolts of malicious lightning.
Didn't you hear the news? CBS picked up Angel and renamed it to Moonlight. :p
unicorngoddess said:
Didn't you hear the news? CBS picked up Angel and renamed it to Moonlight. :p
And fired all the writers, then hired a high school intern to write it.
Reaper has a kind of Buffy/Angel vibe, albeit more outright comedic.
I think Heroes & Pushing Daisies (after it's massive one episode) are up to the same level of creativity as those shows.

Don't live in the past man :)
anom said:
Reaper has a kind of Buffy/Angel vibe, albeit more outright comedic.
Thunder stolen.

I definitely would put Reaper into the same genre/mode as Buffy (and have in comments about the show). It is very good and is (in my opinion) a worth successor to Buffy and Firefly and such.
I think Buffy and Firefly, as farfetched as the premise is, are done in the real world. They're serious in their way, although funny too. Daisies and Reaper are so tongue-in-cheek--I think after a few episodes they'll get old. You could imagine being a student in Buffy's school and having a normal life except for that whole hell mouth thing. ;)
stellie93 said:
I think Buffy and Firefly, as farfetched as the premise is, are done in the real world. They're serious in their way, although funny too. Daisies and Reaper are so tongue-in-cheek--I think after a few episodes they'll get old. You could imagine being a student in Buffy's school and having a normal life except for that whole hell mouth thing. ;)
No I couldn't. Buffy was extremely tongue in cheek.
NJChris said:
How come there is nothing like these shows on? Why can't anyone else but Joss Whedon write like this?

I was watching some episode of Angel yesterday and it just reminded me of this big hole in my tv watching...
Oh yes, I miss those shows!
Are you talking specifically about fantasy shows? Because I would tell you that The Wire, The Shield, Mad Men and Dexter are at least as good if not better than Buffy/Angel/Firefly.
A: Buffy / Angel / Firefly

Q: Shows you couldn't pay me to watch for 2000, Alex.

:eek:

I suspect one reason is most people didn't like them. They had their niche audiences, but never big drawers. That is why I wonder about all these super-natural shows on the schedule this year... I think most of them are going to fail simply because that is not a mainstream taste. Studios and Networks saw Heroes from last year and decided that is sign enough that these dork shows were in high demand... yet the demand is essentially where it has always been.. Fringe and Niche.

Heroes happens to appeal to a broader, non-sci-fi watching audience as well.

I am on record as not being a fan of the supernatural shows for the most part. Personally I think they are a cop-out when it comes to writing. I like a little more realism in a drama and perhaps something more grounded. Characters and writing make the show, but the sci-fi and supernatural backdrops always allow the writers and producers to take short-cuts whenever they feel like, since the story is not grounded in reality. The story can essentially be made up out of whole cloth with little accountability other than fans complaining something made up does not fit in with something previously made up.

I just know in a general sense those types of shows have NEVER been the biggest audience grabbers when it comes to television. Irregardless of my personal preferences.
See less See more
bdowell said:
I definitely would put Reaper into the same genre/mode as Buffy (and have in comments about the show). It is very good and is (in my opinion) a worth successor to Buffy and Firefly and such.
I wish I could agree, but... I was a MAJOR Buffy/Angel fan, but deleted Reaper halfway through the first episode, to my mind it was just too sophomoric.

Pushing Daisies, on the other hand, had a great first episode, but it felt much more like a self-contained mini-movie than a sustainable series. Fingers crossed that the writers find a way to keep it interesting without becoming cloying.

Still waiting for the return of Battlestar Galactica.
BobB said:
I wish I could agree, but... I was a MAJOR Buffy/Angel fan, but deleted Reaper halfway through the first episode, to my mind it was just too sophomoric.

Pushing Daisies, on the other hand, had a great first episode, but it felt much more like a self-contained mini-movie than a sustainable series. Fingers crossed that the writers find a way to keep it interesting without becoming cloying.

Still waiting for the return of Battlestar Galactica.
How well do you remember season 1 (or the pilot episode) of Buffy? It was incredibly sophomoric too.
marksman said:
A: Buffy / Angel / Firefly

Q: Shows you couldn't pay me to watch for 2000, Alex.

:eek:

I suspect one reason is most people didn't like them. They had their niche audiences, but never big drawers. That is why I wonder about all these super-natural shows on the schedule this year... I think most of them are going to fail simply because that is not a mainstream taste. Studios and Networks saw Heroes from last year and decided that is sign enough that these dork shows were in high demand... yet the demand is essentially where it has always been.. Fringe and Niche.

Heroes happens to appeal to a broader, non-sci-fi watching audience as well.

I am on record as not being a fan of the supernatural shows for the most part. Personally I think they are a cop-out when it comes to writing. I like a little more realism in a drama and perhaps something more grounded. Characters and writing make the show, but the sci-fi and supernatural backdrops always allow the writers and producers to take short-cuts whenever they feel like, since the story is not grounded in reality. The story can essentially be made up out of whole cloth with little accountability other than fans complaining something made up does not fit in with something previously made up.

I just know in a general sense those types of shows have NEVER been the biggest audience grabbers when it comes to television. Irregardless of my personal preferences.
Take a show like Ghost Whisperer, cast it with someone who has the boobie-appeal or whatever, then the TV people think that whole genre is popular and want to copy it.

I was right there with you up until your last line (except that I'd leave Firefly out of your first line). "Irregardless" is not a word, and happens to be one of my grammatical pet-peeves.
JLucPicard said:
Take a show like Ghost Whisperer, cast it with someone who has the boobie-appeal or whatever, then the TV people think that whole genre is popular and want to copy it.

I was right there with you up until your last line (except that I'd leave Firefly out of your first line). "Irregardless" is not a word, and happens to be one of my grammatical pet-peeves.
Thanks for the catch on the made up word. :)

I think your Ghost Whisperer example is a good one. But in the scheme of things it is not a highly succesful show... It is marginally succesful but enough so to stay on the air... But if it were not for JLH's twins, it might very well be off the air.
marksman said:
I am on record as not being a fan of the supernatural shows for the most part. Personally I think they are a cop-out when it comes to writing. I like a little more realism in a drama and perhaps something more grounded. Characters and writing make the show, but the sci-fi and supernatural backdrops always allow the writers and producers to take short-cuts whenever they feel like, since the story is not grounded in reality. The story can essentially be made up out of whole cloth with little accountability other than fans complaining something made up does not fit in with something previously made up.
I'm curious what scripted dramas you watch that you feel meet this high standard of realism.
1 - 20 of 42 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top