Same here, a little confused. He spilled some beans to implicate Kim, which he didn't need to do.. and he then took the 86 years to get Kim off. He could have stuck with the 7 years and Kim would be in about the same position.Not sure it makes a lot of sense.
Jimmy's speech didn't save kim from a civil suit
(although I think eventually ms hamlin would realize Kim didn't have to say anything. And Kim doesn't have any assets. And Kim lives in florida where her house is protected from judgement)
Jimmy's goal in allocution was reconciliation with Kim. Gotta think there are better ways than going to prison for an extra 80 years. Was it worth it for one cigarette? Guess it was in tv land.
And the only reason Kim needed to be saved was that he implicated her for all those things in his previous statements. He could have just STFU and done the 7 years minimum security and be out to live the rest of his life. Maybe with Kim, maybe not.He threw away 7 years of minimum security so he can save Kim (and get 86 years in max sec?). Give me a break.