Just to reset the whole "VCRs were awesome and effortless" branch, at the point from which it sprung:
I'll read it, but even the first line is a lie:
It's hard to believe, but a scant 20 years have passed since viewers were unshackled from their televisions.
At worst it's a difference of opinion, hardly a lie. If you have to make sure, daily, that you have the correct tape in the VCR for upcoming recordings (not a different day's tape, or a write-protected rental tape), then you were figuratively still shackled to the machine ... albeit via a longer chain.
The article does credit VCRs for having similar functionality, but you have to have the patience for wading all the way down through the second paragraph to read that perspective.
Sure, you could achieve similar wonders with a VCR, but the process was so laborious that few would try.
Yes, many will argue with the "laborious" characterization, but there's a reason VCR recording glitches were a much-reused joke in that era.
But to cut VCRs some slack and deflate the TiVo/DVR legend, the smaller drive capacity of the early DVR boxes still necessitated getting back to the TV to watch content before it was snuffed, but deep pockets and/or ingenious citizens helped lengthen/break that chain.