Survivor 11/16/06 SPOILERS

Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by betts4, Nov 16, 2006.

  1. drew2k

    drew2k Drew != Drawn

    4,864
    0
    Jun 9, 2003
    Long Island, NY

    Advertisements

    Oh well, so much for that theory! :D
     
  2. hearth

    hearth New Member

    51
    0
    Aug 9, 2002
    Fair Oaks, CA
    I disagree. Right now, in a merger, then Yul and Ozzie are the initial targets (as the strongest members of the smallest tribe). If Ozzie wins the first single immunity, then Yul is the primary target. If the bigger tribe does not know that Yul has the idol, they are likely to try to vote him out. The five vote for him, the four vote for somebody (Johnathon or Nate), and bingo, the idol is used to bring the tribe numbers even.

    However, if people know that Yul has the idol, they will pick off his teammates until he is alone, and the idol will only save him for one week. If he is smart, that idol will get his alliance into the final four.
     
  3. pmyers

    pmyers Well-Known Member

    15,283
    142
    Jan 4, 2001
    Gilbert, AZ
    I would love if the final 2 people got to then vote out 1 each of the extra jury members.
     
  4. Rob Helmerichs

    Rob Helmerichs I am Groot! TCF Club

    57,013
    13,695
    Oct 17, 2000
    Minneapolis
    But that would still leave an even number of jurors.

    Perhaps a mini-challenge at the end would allow one of them to eliminate a juror?
     
  5. InterMurph

    InterMurph Member

    823
    10
    May 22, 2003
    Gloucester, MA

    Advertisements

    That would still leave 9 jurors. In the history of Survivor, they have always had 7 jurors. Regardless of whether they started with 16, 18, or 20 players.

    So I think something in our future will bring it down to 7 jurors.
     
  6. Idearat

    Idearat Active Member

    3,214
    4
    Nov 26, 2000
    Gilroy
    I liked the suggestion that they'd send the final 3 to the jury. If there's a tie, have a tiebreaker on live TV.
     
  7. heySkippy

    heySkippy oldweakandpathetic

    21,152
    1,151
    Jul 2, 2001
    Sarasota, FL
    I'm thinking this might be what's up. They might see it as a way to TiVo-proof the reunion show.
     
  8. TriBruin

    TriBruin Well-Known Member TCF Club

    4,933
    569
    Dec 10, 2003
    Bartlett, IL
    It would be almost impossible to have a Live audience tie breaker as the finally does not run concurrently in all Time Zones.
     
  9. Martin Tupper

    Martin Tupper Pontiff Emeritus

    2,435
    23
    Dec 18, 2003
    Funny...he reminds me of Detective Fallows from Season 1, Episode 24 of Arrested Development
     
  10. Orthogon

    Orthogon New Member

    32
    0
    Jul 26, 2004
    Mt. Airy, MD
    Great, can I be the first to call the....Candam :D
     
  11. Magister

    Magister Fat, Dumb and Happy

    4,354
    0
    Oct 17, 2004
    Columbia, SC
    Pronounced 'Canned Ham'
     
  12. Idearat

    Idearat Active Member

    3,214
    4
    Nov 26, 2000
    Gilroy
    It's already a live finale, at least if you are on the east coast. If the audience can be there live for the reveal, they could be there for a tie breaker.
     
  13. DevdogAZ

    DevdogAZ Give 'em Hell, Devils

    58,744
    4,370
    Apr 16, 2003
    Arizona
    But what he's saying is that if you're going to have the national viewing audience vote, whether it's to break a tie or simply to be another juror, they couldn't do the voting between the final episode and the live finale because both are usually over on the east coast before either one begins airing in the west.
     
  14. Idearat

    Idearat Active Member

    3,214
    4
    Nov 26, 2000
    Gilroy
    Never saw a mention of live audience vote. Guess all the American Idol fans might just tune in if there was just to "be a part of it". But a tie breaking challenge could be done even if we weren't all watching at once.
     

Share This Page

spam firewall

Advertisements