Masters of Science Fiction 08/12/2007 ***SPOILERS***

Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by pkscout, Aug 13, 2007.

  1. pkscout

    pkscout Well-Known Member

    3,999
    37
    Jan 10, 2003
    Honolulu, HI
    Well, no spoilers yet. I just sat down to watch it, and the ABC affiliate here apparently decided not to transmit to dialog channel or something. The commercials are fine, but there is no dialog. I tried watching with closed captioning and gave up.

    Off to find an alternative source to watch it.
     
  2. ClutchBrake

    ClutchBrake Pass the gravy!

    16,819
    290
    Sep 5, 2001
    Orange...
    It was craptastically lame.
     
  3. pkscout

    pkscout Well-Known Member

    3,999
    37
    Jan 10, 2003
    Honolulu, HI
    Well, maybe having no audio is an improvement then. ;) 39 minutes until I know for sure.
     
  4. LlamaLarry

    LlamaLarry Well-Known Member TCF Club

    7,344
    144
    Apr 30, 2003
    Northern...
    Mine recorded something, but twas not Masters of Science Fiction. Was there some sort of sporting event in the DC Metro area that ran long?
     
  5. UTV2TiVo

    UTV2TiVo Well-Known Member TCF Club

    1,260
    243
    Feb 2, 2005
    Sacramento...
    Ran fine out here on the west coast...

    The story had some problems but the feed (I watched it OTA in HD) was fine.
     
  6. dswallow

    dswallow Save the Moderatоr TCF Club

    53,711
    2,519
    Dec 3, 2000
    Long...
    It was forgettable, though better than the first episode.

    I think they need to just apologize to Stephen Hawking and remove his voiceover as well; it only detracts further from the already-lame experience, sinceso far it's not added anything of interest at all to or about the story.
     
  7. UTV2TiVo

    UTV2TiVo Well-Known Member TCF Club

    1,260
    243
    Feb 2, 2005
    Sacramento...
    Yeah, I also had a very hard time understanding the computer voiced voiceover. I mean I know that's how he has to speak but could they clean it up a little for us?
     
  8. gchance

    gchance 4 8 15 16 23 42

    12,632
    1
    Dec 6, 2002
    Olivehurst, CA
    It's very identifiable as Stephen Hawking. The fact that it's old (I think it was state of the art in the late 80s) makes it more identifiable as him.

    Seriously, where have you ever heard that "flavor" of speech synthesis before. It's better than WOPR, probably on the level of Amiga synthesis, but not as good as current technology.

    It does nothing to improve the show though.

    Greg
     
  9. pkscout

    pkscout Well-Known Member

    3,999
    37
    Jan 10, 2003
    Honolulu, HI
    OK, all done. Yup, pretty non-memorable. Marginally better than the first one. I guess we know why they didn't green light this for a longer run. :(
     
  10. Church AV Guy

    Church AV Guy Active Member

    2,353
    1
    Jan 19, 2005
    high desert...
    Isn't anyone going to comment at least that Cigarette Smoking Man has managed to become president? Was that his goal al the time?

    Terry O'Quinn is always interesting to watch. The wife saw him for a second while passing through the room and said, "What happened to his scar?" You've got to love it when that happens. :)

    The story was, um, was there a story? The ability to "denature" radioactive substances could be really useful for nuclear waste.

    Elisabeth Röhm was looking good. I haven't seen her for long while, and she looked pretty familiar, but I couldn't place her until--IMDB to the rescue. :D
     
  11. ClutchBrake

    ClutchBrake Pass the gravy!

    16,819
    290
    Sep 5, 2001
    Orange...
    Well, if that was better than the first one I'm gonna go ahead and delete the first one. And the SP.

    Thanks. :)
     
  12. acvthree

    acvthree Active Member

    2,484
    2
    Jan 17, 2004
    Carrollton,...
    DECtalk.

    Pretty amazing for the time. It would run in a very tiny amount of memory on a very low power processor (a portable unit ran on a 9V battery). It actually modeled the human voice in realtime (adult male, adult female and child). It also supported writen Spanish.

    Al
     
  13. mattack

    mattack Well-Known Member

    24,780
    558
    Apr 9, 2001
    sunnyvale
    I thought both this one AND the first episode were "pretty decent". Not great, not horrible.

    Though I admit I watched both of them while walking on the treadmill and I tend to like "not complete fluff but not INCREDIBLY deep" stories for that... Though on occassion I did watch Studio 60 that way, which is comparatively deep (at least for the amount of dialog you have to process in a given time.. while trying to stay steady on a treadmill at the same time).

    I might have thought they were WAY slower if I tried watching them alone. Both had huge predictable moments though.
     
  14. Fl_Gulfer

    Fl_Gulfer Tivo's R Us

    1,235
    5
    May 27, 2005
    Fl.Gulf
    Well we liked it at my house, but we have a collective IQ of -270
     
  15. 7thton

    7thton No raindrop ever falls in the wrong place

    3,018
    93
    Mar 3, 2005
    I thought that episode was pretty good until the lame ending. But, much better than the first ep.
     
  16. latrobe7

    latrobe7 What, me worry?

    5,805
    66
    May 1, 2005
    Orange...
    I have to agree. I liked the first half or so, but then it just got so sappy and lame. And they ripped off the aliens from Cocoon.
     
  17. dianebrat

    dianebrat wait.. I did what? TCF Club

    12,543
    1,740
    Jul 6, 2002
    boston'ish
    Interesting replies,

    I'm one of those folks, I liked the first episode better, more human drama, fewer all-powerful aliens :)

    Diane
     
  18. pkscout

    pkscout Well-Known Member

    3,999
    37
    Jan 10, 2003
    Honolulu, HI
    True, but the first episode literally wasn't science fiction at all except that it was set in the future where there had been an apocalypse. Once that premise was set there was nothing science fiction about it. The psychology was pretty basic and non-indicative of anything science fictiony (IMHO).

    Really it was psycho-fiction, not science fiction. You could have removed the future and the apocalypse and replaced it with a World War II general or something and had the same effect.
     
  19. sieglinde

    sieglinde Active Member

    5,378
    0
    Aug 11, 2002
    Sebastopol, CA
    I remember a movie that was this exact same thing. The aliens take away the nukes and the Pentagon (is the bad guys in this movie) works to conteract it. It was a black and white movie. That is all I remember about it.

    Howard Fast was the writer of the short story this was based on but even looking in imdb.com I did not find he had any connection with the old movie.
     
  20. ElJay

    ElJay Active Member

    2,104
    12
    Apr 6, 2005
    Gort! Klaatu barada nikto!
     

Share This Page