Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by mwhip, Mar 18, 2011.
pants are worse actually, at least the boots are red. Get it together producers!
LOL I'm not sure if I've disagreed with a statement anymore than I disagree with this one...EVER!
I'm still having trouble wrapping my mind around the fact that this is a David E. Kelly production.
If you ask me, that's so far outside his wheelhouse it's not funny.
Oh, and obviously they should have cast Phyllis Diller.
In the right picture she has a definite "Little People, Big World" vibe happening. Not a fan of any of it.
Lynda Carter is this old guy's gold standard. Much like whoever it was couldn't hold a candle to Farrah in that stupid Charlie's Angels remake.
just put her in a bikini (with the top off) and we'll stop complaining!
Is she wearing Jeggings?
I think it's the man-ssierre....
How long til a wardrobe malfunction?
One frame after that picture.
Crappy cell phone video, the costume doesn't look that bad.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/2lXssMvnpio" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
I like the newer costume better but the best costume and actress is not going to save this if the script is as bad as people have been saying it is.
First thing my eye went to in this picture was actually the Mazda3... lol
She needs to work on her "determined running" face.
You were looking at her face?
That's the best picture I've seen of her in the costume.
The new costume is better, but that's not a huge accomplishment. Virtually anything would have been better.
Is it really that hard to come up with something that looks contemporary, functional, realistic, and not at all cheap and tacky?
Yes. Because superhero costumes were never designed to look contemporary, functional, or realistic on the graphic page. They're drawn to highlight the nude form.
That said, the bustier looks horrendous during that filmed running sequence.