Hahaha ... I find it funny that the present problem seems to distill down to direct interface issues (remote) ... <scratches head> ... I guess I've always puzzled over this to some extent, but the same question remains for me ... why doesn't the device manufacturer account for the spectrum of user desire to some reasonable degree? Now I realize there is a practical limit to how far and to what degree the manufacturer caters to the user base ... but I think there is a surplus of red tape in regards to the glacial rate of effective consensus based change (as an option). The key here is the integration of a seemless evolutionary add on option for the consumer to choose from (or at the very least) a more neutral stance by the manufacturer for qualified variations.