PDA

View Full Version : Funding for Charlie Rose WTF

dishhead2001
02-02-2008, 12:35 AM
I need to vent I really hate that show at that time slot PBS should rerun their 8pm shows like nova like they did a long time ago. What I really dont understand what funding do they need its FRIGGIN interview show on a table with two chairs and a black studio GRRRR

Charlie Rose WORST MOST BORING TV SHOW EVER
AJRitz
02-02-2008, 12:58 AM
Change the channel?
And can I suggest decaf while you're at it?
scandia101
02-02-2008, 04:12 AM
What I really dont understand what funding do they need its FRIGGIN interview show on a table with two chairs and a black studio GRRRR


That's exactly what the problem is. You don't understand what you're complaining about. Thinking that the production of even the simplest programs can be done without money is just plain ignorance.
DevdogAZ
02-03-2008, 04:56 AM
Not to mention that every PBS station sets its own schedule, so if you've got a problem with when Charlie Rose is being aired, contact your local PBS station. It's probably not even on at the same time for the rest of us.
smak
02-03-2008, 04:56 AM
Don't they need to pay, er, Charlie Rose?

-smak-
DevdogAZ
02-03-2008, 05:01 AM
Don't they need to pay, er, Charlie Rose?

-smak-
Yeah, and they've got to run their station, which is a fixed cost regardless of what programming they're airing.
sieglinde
02-04-2008, 06:42 PM
What is wrong with a plain set for a talk show? I think I have seen an episode and it was certainly inoffensive.
mattack
02-04-2008, 10:59 PM
I need to vent I really hate that show at that time slot PBS should rerun their 8pm shows like nova like they did a long time ago. What I really dont understand what funding do they need its FRIGGIN interview show on a table with two chairs and a black studio GRRRR

Charlie Rose WORST MOST BORING TV SHOW EVER

I don't watch it very often, but sometimes it is very entertaining... when it's not (most of the time), I don't watch it. (Err, it's not necessarily 'not entertaining', just less entertaining than something else I choose to watch/listen to.)
BriGuy20
02-07-2008, 06:21 PM
Charlie Rose actually does in-depth interviews. Not everyone likes that, and if you don't you have a plethora of choices for vapid, plug-a-movie type stuff (Leno, Letterman, etc). If you don't like it don't watch it.