MickeS
03-25-2007, 02:11 PM
Did anyone else watch this?
Was it in HD? My recording was in SD, but I don't know if it was because it was recorded on the regular NBC channel. I can't figure out a way on my cable DVR to see what channel a show was recorded on. But I can't see a reason NOT to have this in HD, unless the girls didn't want so much picture detail. :) Miss California seemed to have terrible skin even in SD.
As for the competition itself, it seemed to me as if the women were way hotter than normally this year. They seemed to have somewhat slutified their hair and make-up, maybe that's what helped. :D
Decent choice of winner (http://missusa.com/delegates/2007/files/TN.html), although I probably would've picked Miss Utah (http://missusa.com/delegates/2007/files/UT.html) or Miss Rhode Island (http://missusa.com/delegates/2007/files/RI.html). I didn't think the winner looked that good in the evening gown, thought her boobs were a bit too distracting. :)
Was it in HD? My recording was in SD, but I don't know if it was because it was recorded on the regular NBC channel. I can't figure out a way on my cable DVR to see what channel a show was recorded on. But I can't see a reason NOT to have this in HD, unless the girls didn't want so much picture detail. :) Miss California seemed to have terrible skin even in SD.
As for the competition itself, it seemed to me as if the women were way hotter than normally this year. They seemed to have somewhat slutified their hair and make-up, maybe that's what helped. :D
Decent choice of winner (http://missusa.com/delegates/2007/files/TN.html), although I probably would've picked Miss Utah (http://missusa.com/delegates/2007/files/UT.html) or Miss Rhode Island (http://missusa.com/delegates/2007/files/RI.html). I didn't think the winner looked that good in the evening gown, thought her boobs were a bit too distracting. :)