View Full Version : Advertisement at end of "Rudolph" - never seen this kind before
MickeS
12-09-2006, 11:37 PM
I just watched "Rudolph The Red-Nosed Reindeer", recorded yesterday.
When I got to the end and the options to delete or keep the recording show up, there was also a third option on the bottom in the form of a clickable banner-ad for some contest called "A home for the holidays".
It actually doesn't bother me - I prefer ads like these rather than ads during programming, and if TiVo can make money on it, great. But I've never seen this particular method of advertising before. Is this something new that will be done again, or has it been used before?
/Mike
DevdogAZ
12-10-2006, 01:45 AM
I've never seen it. But then again, I've watched very little TV in the last several weeks.
ChuckyBox
12-10-2006, 02:52 AM
TiVo announced this capability a couple of weeks ago: http://www.tivo.com/cms_static/press_120.html
Leon WIlkinson
12-10-2006, 07:39 PM
That is about a 100% chance of it being seen, plus it sounds like it is not very intrusive.
ilovedvrs
12-10-2006, 09:44 PM
Just got one also...
and does it SUCK
pdhenry
12-10-2006, 09:51 PM
Just got one also...
and does it SUCKI haven't seen one yet. How does it suck? Does it force you to press additional buttons? Does it force you to watch a video ad? Or does it just present advertising on the "delete now?" page?
GoHokies!
12-10-2006, 09:58 PM
Just got one also...
and does it SUCK
I don't understand... You'd prefer Tivo to not collect any advertising revenue and just raise your monthly rates? That doesn't jibe with your "Tivo should be free" subtitle - you don't want to pay the money, and you don't want it to come from advertisers. Do you think that it just grows on trees?
And did we really need a completely different thread on the same topic?
greg_burns
12-10-2006, 10:02 PM
I haven't seen one yet. How does it suck? Does it force you to press additional buttons? Does it force you to watch a video ad? Or does it just present advertising on the "delete now?" page?
http://home.comcast.net/~greg_burns/images/rudolph.jpg
http://home.comcast.net/~greg_burns/images/rudolph2.jpg
pdhenry
12-10-2006, 10:04 PM
So I'd have to cursor *down* to select the ad content? To delete or keep the recording I'd do the exact same thing I did before? Bring it on.
GoHokies!
12-10-2006, 10:07 PM
OMG that sUX!!!111!!!
MY TIVo WIL NeVER B the SAME!! :rolleyes:
Thanks for posting Greg, that's as non intrusive as can be, and I'm certainly glad to see Tivo get another revenue stream.
greg_burns
12-10-2006, 10:18 PM
I have same recording on my S3. But it doesn't do it... yet. ;)
ufo4sale
12-10-2006, 10:21 PM
I can see how TiVo could potentially make a lot of money from this if they insert ad links to the end of every show. A very ingenues idea, if I might say.
BlackBetty
12-10-2006, 10:22 PM
I think its awesome! Bring it on TiVo. Increase your revenue and prosper.
peteypete
12-10-2006, 10:46 PM
Big deal. It's unobtrusive. Some people will watch. Tivo can deploy to all shows for one advertiser.
I'm sad that I'll probably never see this on my DTiVo. I do watch ads that interest me, and this would make it easier to do that. Seems pretty unobtrusive.
ZeoTiVo
12-10-2006, 11:09 PM
still looking for that Victoria's Secret ad :D
CharlesH
12-10-2006, 11:13 PM
There are times when I actually would WANT to see an ad for something I am thinking of buying. Targeting it to those who might be interested, and making it easy to ignore if you don't want to see it, seems to be a winner for all except those who consider advertisements inherently and universally evil. :)
TydalForce
12-10-2006, 11:49 PM
Ads aren't evil - they pay for things (or help pay for things) so we don't have to. As long as they stay unobtrusive.
E.G. popup ads - open a new window, get in the way, and often have flash and other crap. They're bad (thank goodness Firefox blocks them)
this ad? not bad... it's out of the way, doesn't change how we interact with our TiVo, and will help out TiVo Inc. Don't like the ads? Don't watch them. Simple enough ;-}
megazone
12-10-2006, 11:58 PM
I figured TiVo would do this in a very unobtrusive manner, and it looks like they succeeded. I don't see how anyone could seriously have a problem with this system. The only people I could see this bothering are those who just dislike all advertising and wouldn't be happy with any thing but no ads at all.
this ad? not bad... it's out of the way, doesn't change how we interact with our TiVo, and will help out TiVo Inc. Don't like the ads? Don't watch them. Simple enough ;-}
So how does it help Tivo if you don't watch them? It sure looks like "pay per click" type of ad. Even if it is not "pay per click", do you you think that anybody will pay for ads that are "unobtrusive" enough that most of the people will not watch them? As it is these ads are only available to about 1.2 million TiVos. If 90% of the viewers ignore them, then you can do better advertising in local community paper.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 12:06 AM
I figured TiVo would do this in a very unobtrusive manner, and it looks like they succeeded. I don't see how anyone could seriously have a problem with this system. The only people I could see this bothering are those who just dislike all advertising and wouldn't be happy with any thing but no ads at all.
Some of us would probably object if HBO or Showtime began running advertising, wouldn't we? Would we be wrong for expecting a subscription service not to bother us with advertising?
I still believe if you get ads you should be compensated for them with a lower service fee. And if you don't want ads, you simply should be able to pay to not get them.
As far as I'm concerned, advertising is clutter; and I don't need more clutter in my life. I don't care one bit if using that otherwise empty space helps TiVo. I prefer that space to remain related specifically to functional services of my device, not advertising, or left blank.
Anybody who develops a hack to completely remove these sorts of ads should feel free to contact me anytime for free hosting space and bandwidth to distribute the hack.
megazone
12-11-2006, 12:24 AM
Some of us would probably object if HBO or Showtime began running advertising, wouldn't we? Would we be wrong for expecting a subscription service not to bother us with advertising?Actually, yes, I think you'd be wrong. Unless the subscription service is explicitly ad free. I subscribe to many magazines - they all have ads. I subscribe to cable TV - most of the channels have ads. In the past I've subscribed to things like Time-Life videos, and they come with ads in the box.
The TiVo service has never been promoted as ad free, in fact, quite the opposite. And TiVo is not profitable and need more revenue to remain in business. So they can increase user fees or find other revenue, such as ads. They've always been unobtrusive about them and that's the best they can do, IMHO.
If they offered a way to pay more instead of get the ads I doubt enough people would put their money where their mouth is to make it worth while. And tracking stuff like that is added overhead costs so it'd have to make up for the ads and pay for the administration of the program. I can't see it being worth the effort for them to do it. Especially since it only makes sense if it gains them enough business - who isn't buying TiVo because of the ads who would if they could pay more not to get them?
It sounds like you're one of the people who just dislike ads on general principal, so you won't be happy with any advertising.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 12:36 AM
Actually, yes, I think you'd be wrong. Unless the subscription service is explicitly ad free. I subscribe to many magazines - they all have ads. I subscribe to cable TV - most of the channels have ads. In the past I've subscribed to things like Time-Life videos, and they come with ads in the box.
The TiVo service has never been promoted as ad free, in fact, quite the opposite. And TiVo is not profitable and need more revenue to remain in business. So they can increase user fees or find other revenue, such as ads. They've always been unobtrusive about them and that's the best they can do, IMHO.
If they offered a way to pay more instead of get the ads I doubt enough people would put their money where their mouth is to make it worth while. And tracking stuff like that is added overhead costs so it'd have to make up for the ads and pay for the administration of the program. I can't see it being worth the effort for them to do it. Especially since it only makes sense if it gains them enough business - who isn't buying TiVo because of the ads who would if they could pay more not to get them?
It sounds like you're one of the people who just dislike ads on general principal, so you won't be happy with any advertising.
Well... considering they continually expand the amount of ad clutter throughout the TiVo interface, there was a time people who subscribed did so with the belief they wouldn't have ad clutter.
The best they can do is eliminate the ads. They choose not to do the best they can do.
How much revenue do they really earn by having a unit receive such advertising? Triple it and charge the customer that amount to have them disappear; though I'd certainly prefer to see them credit everyone who wanted the advertising. I suspect the advertising income is very minimal anyway, at least from what I recall in prior 10Q's.
Contrary to what advertisers would like you to believe, there's nothing wrong with disliking ads and doing everything one can do to not have to endure them. And in fact at times I will specifically avoid purchasing brands or products when I'm faced with obnoxious advertising (remember the X-10 pop-under ad campaigns on web sites?; I will never buy an X-10 product. Ever. Good campaign for them. I'll exclusively buy equivalent stuff from their competitors.). So it'd be to the advertisers benefit to ensure their ads don't appear on any TiVo device I might subscribe.
megazone
12-11-2006, 12:51 AM
Ad revenue is a growing part of TiVo's revenue, taking on more importance with time. Each new system provides more revenue.
I'm not willing to pay more just to get rid of the ads. They don't bother me, in fact, I like some of them. I suspect that they don't bother most users enough to pay more. People already complain about paying too much, ask them to pay more just to avoid some unobtrusive ads and I don't see you getting many takers.
Anyone who had the belief there wouldn't be ads didn't read the user agreement, even back in the early days. Advertising has been part of TiVo's business plan since the beginning.
If you don't like the ads, there is always MythTV.
And it is only to the advertisers benefit to not have their ads appear if more people would NOT by their product because of it than WOULD buy their product. Since very, very few people actually bother to avoid buying something due to an ad, it doesn't matter. You just don't matter enough to sway them.
If you really didn't like ads you wouldn't use TiVo.
GoHokies!
12-11-2006, 01:01 AM
Well... considering they continually expand the amount of ad clutter throughout the TiVo interface, there was a time people who subscribed did so with the belief they wouldn't have ad clutter.
Believing in something doesn't necessarily make it fact (see also: easter bunny, tooth fairy). As far as the continual expansion, we're look at what? Tivo Central, and the "Delete this program?" dialog, two screens that are up for less than 3-5 seconds each time they appear? While that is an expansion over no ads, it's hardly the ad littered landscape that you make it sound like.
The best they can do is eliminate the ads.
Only if you want your service fee to go up of Tivo to go out of buisness.
They choose not to do the best they can do.
Not really, see above.
How much revenue do they really earn by having a unit receive such advertising? Triple it and charge the customer that amount to have them disappear; though I'd certainly prefer to see them credit everyone who wanted the advertising. I suspect the advertising income is very minimal anyway, at least from what I recall in prior 10Q's.And how many of those quarters had this advertising mechanism in them?
None at all?
Exactly.
Contrary to what advertisers would like you to believe, there's nothing wrong with disliking ads and doing everything one can do to not have to endure them. And in fact at times I will specifically avoid purchasing brands or products when I'm faced with obnoxious advertising (remember the X-10 pop-under ad campaigns on web sites?; I will never buy an X-10 product. Ever. Good campaign for them. I'll exclusively buy equivalent stuff from their competitors.). So it'd be to the advertisers benefit to ensure their ads don't appear on any TiVo device I might subscribe.That's a shame, since X-10 products are sold by a lot more people than just X-10.com (the horrible ad people). Sounds like it's your misinformation that's the problem, not the product.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 01:03 AM
If you really didn't like ads you wouldn't use TiVo.
Actually in a sense I don't. The DirecTV w/TiVo units aren't littered with advertising.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 01:07 AM
Only if you want your service fee to go up of Tivo to go out of buisness.
If TiVo isn't charging enough that they go out of business with advertising revenue, I think I'd place the blame on TiVo not charging enough to begin with.
Though considering for all practical purposes, they just increased prices $7/month, one would wonder if every subscriber on older pricing plans is helping put TiVo out of business, if you follow your line of reasoning.
Over the years, all that's happened is TiVo charges higher and higher prices for service; and TiVo adds more and more intrusive advertising to the service. And that's ignoring the money they make on selling viewing data, which since it's non-intrusive, doesn't bother me at all.
GoHokies!
12-11-2006, 01:17 AM
Over the years, all that's happened is TiVo charges higher and higher prices for service; and TiVo adds more and more intrusive advertising to the service.
Which is exactly they should be trying to do - bring in more revenue, in the hopes of turning a profit.
The fact that Tivo has to either increase revenue or decrease expenses is a given. I certainly prefer this to higher service fees or decreased expenses which would decrease the quality of the product that they put out.
Obviously you'd prefer another revenue stream - any suggestions?
mike3775
12-11-2006, 01:34 AM
.
That's a shame, since X-10 products are sold by a lot more people than just X-10.com (the horrible ad people). Sounds like it's your misinformation that's the problem, not the product.
But they paid the ad company to do that crap, thus they get no money from him, which is his right.
Me, I don't care right now about the ads, but what happens when they are no longer unobtrusive and pop up on every screen you use to access now playing? Imagine hitting the Tivo button, and instead of seeing the now playing list immediately, you see a screen for an ad and you have to select no to get to the now playing list, then after doing that, you select your program, and when you hit play, instead of starting what you selected, another ad pops up where you have to hit no to start watching the program. Then after the program ends, instead of getting the normal delete or keep message, you get another ad where you have to say no, before being allowed to delete. You honestly think that won't happen in the future if this new way doesn't work?
Remember, websites never relied on pop ups until the ad market went south, now many websites have numerous pop ups to bring in revenue.
GoHokies!
12-11-2006, 01:42 AM
But they paid the ad company to do that crap, thus they get no money from him, which is his right.
:confused:, but irrelevant.
Me, I don't care right now about the ads, but what happens when they are no longer unobtrusive and pop up on every screen you use to access now playing? Imagine hitting the Tivo button, and instead of seeing the now playing list immediately, you see a screen for an ad and you have to select no to get to the now playing list, then after doing that, you select your program, and when you hit play, instead of starting what you selected, another ad pops up where you have to hit no to start watching the program. Then after the program ends, instead of getting the normal delete or keep message, you get another ad where you have to say no, before being allowed to delete. You honestly think that won't happen in the future if this new way doesn't work?
That would suck, and there would be a mass exodus of subscribers. Yes, I honestly think that Tivo knows that and wouldn't go that far. Do you honestly think that Tivo would be that foolish?
Instead, I just focus on what is actually happening now, and not speculating on what may happen with the ads in the future. So far, not offended.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 01:57 AM
Series 3 owners are next on the ad hit list, you know.
Just wait until advertisers get approached by TiVo to buy scroll-time on the Series 3 front panel displays. :)
There's also plenty of animated backgrounds that could be swapped out for backgrounds with advertising; anyone care to guess how long it'll take to sell that real estate off?
And certainly the progress bar doesn't need to be a solid color, it could be a company logo pattern, like a Coca-Cola swirl...
And why not animate those little icons like the check marks when something is selected; surely no one will object if we get a 1 second pop-tart ad instead of a check mark everytime an item is selected.
None of those "interfere" with your use of the unit; would any of that sort of stuff bother you if TiVo implemented them and sold the ad space it represented?
A friend from Florida visited me recently; his first time in NJ. His comment after driving up on the Garden State Parkway was that he was amazed how pretty everything is. You know why? No billboards. All green foliage and trees; even the guardrails are colored brown to fit in with the landscape better. The cement barriers on the sides of bridges mostly use real wood along the top in order to soften their look. It's a far more peaceful driving experience than billboard-laden highways. At least if TiVo had an option to pay for being ad-free you'd be getting something for your extra money.
Stu_Bee
12-11-2006, 02:13 AM
Not Tivo related...but it is ad related....
Was watching the series premier of "My Boys", and it had one character talking at length about dating on match.com. Of course the TV show is sponsored by match.com. Argh. Now that's intrusive, but probably the future.
johndierks
12-11-2006, 05:08 AM
I love the myth in this thread.
"Poor, poor Tivo. They have to have ads or else they might go out of business!"
Yeah, no. It's not like Tivo is a free service we all get from the kindness of Tivo's heart. If I remember correctly I paid $199 for my box and $250 for the lifetime service back in the day. Frankly if Tivo can't make ends meet at that cost, they shouldn't be in business, they're product isn't popular, or it's a poorly run business.
If they want to add ads to the system, make it a choice. It's dumb that I have no choice whether 'features' get added to my box. Why don't they create some new features and then prompt the user:
"We've got some cool new features you might like! Press thumbs up to accept!*
* Features include ad supported content"
Hmm, maybe TivoToGo for Mac? There's a feature I'd like! ;)
This is further example that's the subscription model was the wrong business model in the first place.
bkane
12-11-2006, 05:29 AM
I love the myth in this thread.
"Poor, poor Tivo. They have to have ads or else they might go out of business!"
Yeah, no. It's not like Tivo is a free service we all get from the kindness of Tivo's heart. If I remember correctly I paid $199 for my box and $250 for the lifetime service back in the day. Frankly if Tivo can't make ends meet at that cost, they shouldn't be in business, they're product isn't popular, or it's a poorly run business.
If they want to add ads to the system, make it a choice. It's dumb that I have no choice whether 'features' get added to my box. Why don't they create some new features and then prompt the user:
"We've got some cool new features you might like! Press thumbs up to accept!*
* Features include ad supported content"
Hmm, maybe TivoToGo for Mac? There's a feature I'd like! ;)
This is further example that's the subscription model was the wrong business model in the first place.
And may I ask what the right business model might be?
Also not anyone here said "Poor, poor TiVo." Everyone is talking about TiVo creating a new revenue stream to help them seeing as they get no money from you.
Billy66
12-11-2006, 05:51 AM
Even not being obtrusive, TiVo fans should be a little pissed. I mean how long do you wait for real features and real fixes? Undelete took about 4 years after the hackers gave it to us. Still no free space indicator. No development on "Teach TiVo" or things that can be useful. New features and fixes take forever.
This though, this gets the fast track push right to your box. Even if you ignore them completely, don't you think that TiVo should be working on DVR features for you? I mean service costs like 20 bucks a month now.
bkane
12-11-2006, 05:54 AM
Its money coming in now so its more important to them. And anyway how many people here actually pay more than the MSD for each TiVo box they own. People complain but no one even pays the new fee or anything at all. The lifetime deal was just awesome but it hurt TiVo.
I don't understand... You'd prefer Tivo to not collect any advertising revenue and just raise your monthly rates? That doesn't jibe with your "Tivo should be free" subtitle - you don't want to pay the money, and you don't want it to come from advertisers. Do you think that it just grows on trees?
I have 3 subscriptions to TiVo which costs me a total of $322.20/year and my rates are lower than the new ones being charged! For that I receive program schedule updates which cost TiVo very little and periodic poorly written and mostly untested software "updates" which I neither requested nor want.
If TiVo can't make money with subscriptions at those rates -- that's enough to buy a new copy of Windows XP for each machine each year -- then sticking ads all over the place (you don't think at the end of programs is the only place they intend to put them do you?) isn't going to be enough to help them.
GoHokies!
12-11-2006, 09:07 AM
Series 3 owners are next on the ad hit list, you know.
Just wait until advertisers get approached by TiVo to buy scroll-time on the Series 3 front panel displays. :)
And I'll welcome this on my S3 just like I did on my 3 S2s
There's also plenty of animated backgrounds that could be swapped out for backgrounds with advertising; anyone care to guess how long it'll take to sell that real estate off?
And certainly the progress bar doesn't need to be a solid color, it could be a company logo pattern, like a Coca-Cola swirl...
And why not animate those little icons like the check marks when something is selected; surely no one will object if we get a 1 second pop-tart ad instead of a check mark everytime an item is selected.
None of those "interfere" with your use of the unit; would any of that sort of stuff bother you if TiVo implemented them and sold the ad space it represented?
A friend from Florida visited me recently; his first time in NJ. His comment after driving up on the Garden State Parkway was that he was amazed how pretty everything is. You know why? No billboards. All green foliage and trees; even the guardrails are colored brown to fit in with the landscape better. The cement barriers on the sides of bridges mostly use real wood along the top in order to soften their look. It's a far more peaceful driving experience than billboard-laden highways. At least if TiVo had an option to pay for being ad-free you'd be getting something for your extra money.
You must have missed the part where I said:
That would suck, and there would be a mass exodus of subscribers. Yes, I honestly think that Tivo knows that and wouldn't go that far. Do you honestly think that Tivo would be that foolish?
Instead, I just focus on what is actually happening now, and not speculating on what may happen with the ads in the future. So far, not offended.
I seriously doubt that Tivo will take it that far. If they do, I'll reconsider at that point but at this point there's no sense in running around like Chicken Little talking about the sky falling because of this one unobtrusive ad that your DirecTivo probably won't even get.
If they want to add ads to the system, make it a choice. It's dumb that I have no choice whether 'features' get added to my box. Why don't they create some new features and then prompt the user:
This has been discussed over and over again around here - for all the complaining about Tivos Customer service/Tech Support, how much worse do you think it would be with dozens of different software versions with different feature sets? Getting "upgrades" is something that you agreed to when you subscribed. Don't like it? Go somewhere else.
Even not being obtrusive, TiVo fans should be a little pissed. I mean how long do you wait for real features and real fixes? Undelete took about 4 years after the hackers gave it to us. Still no free space indicator. No development on "Teach TiVo" or things that can be useful. New features and fixes take forever.
This though, this gets the fast track push right to your box. Even if you ignore them completely, don't you think that TiVo should be working on DVR features for you? I mean service costs like 20 bucks a month now.
Not for most of us around here, the 20 bucks a month is going to be a pretty small crowd, I think... There are just so many ways to get it cheaper. As far as the other things, how long do you think that Tivo was working on this? There was just a pretty good update for the S2, and we should see another one for the S3 in the near future. If Tivo had any intention of providing a FSI, I'm sure that they would have written one in by now. At that point, it's not a resources decision on their part...
I have 3 subscriptions to TiVo which costs me a total of $322.20/year and my rates are lower than the new ones being charged! For that I receive program schedule updates which cost TiVo very little and periodic poorly written and mostly untested software "updates" which I neither requested nor want.
See above on not wanting the updates. As far as not testing, you're either being deliberately misleading or completely ignorant of the facts. It's common knowledge that Tivo does Beta testing and it's covered by some strict NDAs, so you're not going to hear about them. Just becuase you don't see them doesn't mean that they don't exist.
[quote=RoyK]If TiVo can't make money with subscriptions at those rates -- that's enough to buy a new copy of Windows XP for each machine each year -- then sticking ads all over the place (you don't think at the end of programs is the only place they intend to put them do you?) isn't going to be enough to help them.[quote]
Measuring what you pay in terms of another software product does nothing to change how much money you give Tivo each year and nothing to change the fact that they have to increase their revenue stream. Every little bit of revenue helps - it remains to be seen whether this will be enough.
mike3775
12-11-2006, 09:24 AM
That would suck, and there would be a mass exodus of subscribers. Yes, I honestly think that Tivo knows that and wouldn't go that far. Do you honestly think that Tivo would be that foolish?
Instead, I just focus on what is actually happening now, and not speculating on what may happen with the ads in the future. So far, not offended.
Yes I do think Tivo would be that foolish. Tivo has not had any luck with ads so far. No matter how they do it, not many actually watch them. Which is why I can see Tivo doing what I posted earlier, its only a matter of time.
And hate to say it, but once they put ads in like that, it is ok to speculate what may happen, because people have seen what happens when ads do not make the money that is promised.
And look at DVR's from cable companies. They may not be as great as a Tivo, but guess what, the subscription numbers are rising, and cable companies are somehow making money off of them, and they charge less than what Tivo does. Sure they may not have the T2T features or the networking features, but guess what, not everyone wants them. Another turn off to Tivo is the subscription prices. Why should someone who is content with a Comcast DVR(which has no ads) who is paying $5 a month to Comcast, want to switch to a Tivo and pay anywhere from $13-$20 a month to get basically the same DVR that they get now for $5? Not many will.
Every little bit of revenue helps - it remains to be seen whether this will be enough.
I already know the answer from experiance, it will not be enough. Why? Because if Tivo is only getting paid when they are viewed, giving the option to view them isn't enough, they will eventually have to force us to watch them. And right now, I have never watched any ads that appear on my Tivo DVR. And I know I am not alone in that either. I have no interest in the ads regardless of what they are for.
ZeoTiVo
12-11-2006, 09:29 AM
what happens when they are no longer unobtrusive and pop up on every screen you use to access now playing? Imagine hitting the Tivo button, and instead of seeing the now playing list immediately, you see a screen for an ad and you have to select no to get to the now playing list, then after doing that, you select your program, that was actually TiVo Inc's first try at advertising. An ad that popped up before now playing(I think). They lost subscribers, realized the mistake was making people hit an extra remote button and have never gone back to that model. They know that is a line they can not cross and all the chicken Little's running around crying "Slippery slope" does not make it a slippery slope.
If everyone who posted in this forum saying they do not like ads on the TiVo DVR actually cancelled their service while telling TiVo why, then TiVo inc. would take a new direction. I suspect though that the posters will just grumble here but never really do anything about it because the ads never really change how they use the TiVo DVR anyway
As far as not testing, you're either being deliberately misleading or completely ignorant of the facts. It's common knowledge that Tivo does Beta testing and it's covered by some strict NDAs, so you're not going to hear about them. Just becuase you don't see them doesn't mean that they don't exist.
Ref version 7.3 - I rest my case
ZeoTiVo
12-11-2006, 10:00 AM
Ref version 7.3 - I rest my case
we all know that 7.3 had KidZone and that was a partner deal with 3rd parties. No matter what TiVo did or did not know they had a deadline and had to release if no showstoppers.
There is no way you can claim to know what testing TiVo did, what business decisions they made and how much they spend on it other than the final total in public filings.
For all we know this ad at delete screen was aprt of 7.3 but use was delayed until a fix for the issues in 7.3 was released as that was given prioroity,
You have a weak case but again if you stopped using the TiVo DVR in favor of something else then we might start taking this more seriously
mike3775
12-11-2006, 10:12 AM
You have a weak case but again if you stopped using the TiVo DVR in favor of something else then we might start taking this more seriously
There have been plenty of threads here about people cancelling Tivo and going to cable company DVR's or Media Edition PC's though. There have been people who have cancelled. In fact when someone does post it, the sharks jump on the person and say things like "oh enjoy your crappy cable co DVR and not have this or that" all the time.
But people have cancelled Tivo before and people will cancel Tivo if the ads get to intrusive.
I can see Tivo going back down that slippery slope myself, becuse if they need money, they will have to do something to get people to actually view the ads, and if they are not paid unless the ads are viewed, Tivo isn't going to make much money on the ads if very few of the subscribers actually watch the ads.
JohnBrowning
12-11-2006, 10:20 AM
A one-liner promoting an ad you DON'T have to watch or do ANYTHING to avoid! What a stupid thing to whine about!
mike3775
12-11-2006, 10:33 AM
A one-liner promoting an ad you DON'T have to watch or do ANYTHING to avoid! What a stupid thing to whine about!
Right now we don't have to, but unfortunately I do not see that staying that way either.
I said earlier I do not care right now, but I know what is going to happen eventually, because the ad market is very weak right now, and if Tivo only gets paid per ad view, they will have to do something to get more people to view the ads eventually otherwise this deal will be a flop.
kmill14
12-11-2006, 10:36 AM
First off...do you think the "generic" dvrs by the cable/sattelite won't eventually try segmented advertising as well? And they may very well make it more intrusive.
Also, how are people viewing this as intrusive at all? I don't get it. You don't actually watch an ad unless you choose to. You can simply exit the final screen without ever watching a single second of an ad you don"t want to watch. I applaud Tivo for coming up with this idea, verses alternative advertising methods.
Leon WIlkinson
12-11-2006, 10:41 AM
Over the years, all that's happened is TiVo charges higher and higher prices for service; and TiVo adds more and more intrusive advertising to the service. And that's ignoring the money they make on selling viewing data, which since it's non-intrusive, doesn't bother me at all.
So if TiVo would find a way to subliminally push out ads, you would be OK with it? ;)
Tysonation
12-11-2006, 11:06 AM
Advertising is everywhere you are, whether you like it or not and whether you know it or not. Magazines are now ads, TV shows are now ads. I fail to see how this is obtrusive at all.
I saw one of the new ads last night. I have no problem at all with it. It is unobtrusive, you don't have to select it if yo don't want to, and you never know, we might just be surprised some day with something in there that we want.
To the folks at TiVo: This works great. You implemented this very well.
MickeS
12-11-2006, 12:33 PM
There's also plenty of animated backgrounds that could be swapped out for backgrounds with advertising; anyone care to guess how long it'll take to sell that real estate off?
I've always wondered why they don't already do that. I just don't understand what the problem is with "newspaper-like" ads that require no effort at all by the user in order to use the product in the same manner as if there were no ads.
Then again, I'm from a country where all the professional sports teams uniforms are covered with ads. :D
Dennis Wilkinson
12-11-2006, 12:56 PM
I just don't understand what the problem is with "newspaper-like" ads that require no effort at all by the user in order to use the product in the same manner as if there were no ads.
Haven't seen one of these myself yet, but if they're really as simple as what Greg posted, that won't bother me.
I agree that "newspaper"-like ads won't faze me, but I'd go one further than just "use the product in the same manner" and say that I'd be annoyed if they used screen real estate with any real "usability" value to display ads (for example, reducing the amount of the guide that displays by placing an ad, or a program info screen, or the like.) That was always my beef with ads on the Comcast cable boxes.
This seems to pass my tests - my remote-control muscle memory doesn't need to be changed, and the ad takes up just a litle space that wasn't previously usefully occupied.
And, yes, I have watched ads that TiVo has placed on my boxes, although usually just the movie trailers... ;)
still looking for that Victoria's Secret ad :D
Too bad - it's a Secret ad.
So there are no serious or worthwhile complaints in this thread from anyone other than the "Slipper Slop" BS crowd. Big surprise.
Unobtrusive advertising that I can choose whether or not to view - not a problem!
JimSpence
12-11-2006, 01:48 PM
Actually in a sense I don't. The DirecTV w/TiVo units aren't littered with advertising.True, but if DirecTV can use this same functionality to reduce its rates or at least keep them at bay, I'd welcome them. At least as they seem to be used at the moment.
How many DVDs do you buy or rent that have the ads at the front that can't be skipped' At least with the TiVo version you can just go about your business.
Downidb
12-11-2006, 01:57 PM
Y\ Why should someone who is content with a Comcast DVR(which has no ads) who is paying $5 a month to Comcast, want to switch to a Tivo and pay anywhere from $13-$20 a month to get basically the same DVR that they get now for $5? Not many will.
Actually the Comcast DVR now has ads. They showed up briefly about 2 months ago, then disappeared, now they're back with a vengeance. Basically instead of seeing 5 channels of guide data, you now see 4 channels and an advertising banner. Plus you're forced to click past the ad if you scroll down a page or up a page moving channel by channel. So basically they took away part of the functionality of the guide and part of the information.
I was planning on trying to hold out until the TiVo software was available on a Comcast box, but now I may be forced to go ahead and move to a S3.
Billy66
12-11-2006, 02:36 PM
True, but if DirecTV can use this same functionality to reduce its rates or at least keep them at bay, I'd welcome them. At least as they seem to be used at the moment.
If they reduced rates or kept them at bay that would be one thing. I think that there has been like a 40% increase in rates for some.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 02:37 PM
True, but if DirecTV can use this same functionality to reduce its rates or at least keep them at bay, I'd welcome them. At least as they seem to be used at the moment.
How many DVDs do you buy or rent that have the ads at the front that can't be skipped' At least with the TiVo version you can just go about your business.
TiVo ads have increased TiVo's service prices. My whole point was that the advertising should decrease them.
I've never rented a DVD in my life.
I don't buy any DVD's that can't skip past ads at the beginning. I've gotten a few of them free that can't skip ads at the beginning. Notice how there's a discount involved when ads are present? :)
Einselen
12-11-2006, 02:46 PM
I don't buy any DVD's that can't skip past ads at the beginning. I've gotten a few of them free that can't skip ads at the beginning. Notice how there's a discount involved when ads are present? :)
How do you know before you buy them? Do you rent all DVDs first and then purchase later? Not trying to be snarky, just wondering if there is a way to tell.
megazone
12-11-2006, 03:01 PM
Series 3 owners are next on the ad hit list, you know.Of course, and?
Just wait until advertisers get approached by TiVo to buy scroll-time on the Series 3 front panel displays. :)Too small to bother - I have decent vision and I can't read it from where I sit anyway. So they can put what they want on there. ;-)
There's also plenty of animated backgrounds that could be swapped out for backgrounds with advertising; anyone care to guess how long it'll take to sell that real estate off?Probably a while. It'll take another software change to make any kind of clickable banners or something. As long as they don't interfere with standard usage - and they don't do something like make the menus smaller to make more room for ads - it would work. The only thing that's ever bugged me about the TiVo Central Promos is the variation in the UI - how it can be there or not be there. I'd just like it to always be there.
And certainly the progress bar doesn't need to be a solid color, it could be a company logo pattern, like a Coca-Cola swirl...Or just put a company logo up "This recording sponsored by Pepsi!"
And why not animate those little icons like the check marks when something is selected; surely no one will object if we get a 1 second pop-tart ad instead of a check mark everytime an item is selected.That's just stupid. You don't mix ads into the UI. That'd never pass usability testing.
None of those "interfere" with your use of the unit; would any of that sort of stuff bother you if TiVo implemented them and sold the ad space it represented?Except for the last one, which I do think 'interferes' with use because it messes with the UI conventions, it doesn't sound bad. It would matter more *how* it is done. A simple static at on a menu screen that isn't chewing up a lot of screen real estate, not bad. Squeezing the menus down to use a quarter of the screen for an ad - bad.
At least if TiVo had an option to pay for being ad-free you'd be getting something for your extra money.Well, I'm not going to pay more to avoid something that doesn't bug me in the first place.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 03:03 PM
How do you know before you buy them? Do you rent all DVDs first and then purchase later? Not trying to be snarky, just wondering if there is a way to tell.
If I ever ended up with one, it'd go back. As far as I know there's no way to tell from the box, though I'm sure people would make some sort of comment about it on Amazon or other sites that all user reviews.
Considering I've had it happen on free DVDs I've gotten -- like various offers for pizza deliveries that come with your choice of a free DVD -- so I suspect the cheaper the DVD, the more likely you might suffer through mandatory ads.
I have no problems with ads being there; as long as some key on the remote lets me skip immediately past them to the main menu. But if they're mandatory, I better have been informed up front and would only accept it if there were an obvious discount offered for that intrusion.
Frankly the FBI warning annoys me. It's rarely possible to get around that one, no matter what tricks I might try... well, except by just going directly to the right VOB file on a PC player. Of course, I also get a chuckle when I see that FBI warning displayed on a non-region 1 DVD, too. Talk about completely meaningless crap displayed on-screen just because someone once displayed it on-screen... :)
dswallow
12-11-2006, 03:05 PM
Well, I'm not going to pay more to avoid something that doesn't bug me in the first place.
But you're OK with paying more AND getting ads. Strange.
Einselen
12-11-2006, 03:11 PM
dswallow
Just thought of this. How do you feel about movies and the ads in front of them and I am not just talking about the trailers. Do you not go to movies anymore (I rarely go myself, I have BBO and Tivo with on-campus movie channel plus free movies each week on-campus so I am pretty set) or do you show up like 10 min into the start to skip all the ads and trailers?
E
megazone
12-11-2006, 03:16 PM
This though, this gets the fast track push right to your box. Even if you ignore them completely, don't you think that TiVo should be working on DVR features for you? I mean service costs like 20 bucks a month now.I think they need to do what keeps them in business. I've been a TiVo users for about 5 years now and they've continually added new features. There are always people who aren't happy because the feature *they* want hasn't been added. And the same silly "But there is a hack for it" often comes up as justification. Hacks don't have to pass QA and usability testing. They don't have to be maintainable and ensure they won't interfere with any other development.
There are two kinds of features - consumer oriented and industry oriented. TiVo works on both simultaneously. And saying this had a 'fast track push' is silly - do you know how long they've been working on it? They might've started last year for all you know, and only announced it when they had something ready to go.
megazone
12-11-2006, 03:18 PM
But you're OK with paying more AND getting ads. Strange.I'm not paying more - even if I bought a new box today I wouldn't, because I'd buy 3-years pre-paid. If someone else wants to buy 1-year monthly, let them.
And I just don't look at it like you do. I see the ad revenue as helping keep the subscription fees from being even higher. I think *everyone* is compensated for the ads already.
megazone
12-11-2006, 03:33 PM
Tivo has not had any luck with ads so far. No matter how they do it, not many actually watch them.And how did you get access to this information?
TiVo themselves, on the con calls, have stated that response to the ads has been positive. And more and more advertisers have been attracted to TiVo because of the success to date. So 'not had any luck' sure doesn't seem to agree with their statements.
And hate to say it, but once they put ads in like that, it is ok to speculate what may happen, because people have seen what happens when ads do not make the money that is promised.********. Plain and simple, ********. Because some websites did it means TiVo will do it - it isn't even the majority, or even a noticeable minority for that matter, of sites that heavily embraced pop-ups. Sure, some high profile sites did it, but it is already dying because all it did was get all the major browsers to include pop-up blockers by default.
Slippery slope arguments are almost always ********. People have been saying that TiVo is going to force ads on users since at least 2001, which is when I really started following the communities. One of the first promo systems TiVo uses were Pre-TiVo Central Messages - PTCMs. They still use them for TiVo-related messages, like software updates, but that's all these days. People didn't react well to promotions when they were just trying to access TiVo Central. TiVo switched to the Gold Star Promos. They've been very careful to keep advertising from interfering with the use of the product. I really don't believe TiVo would start putting forced ads before playback of a recording, etc.
There is no evidence, based on TiVo's behavior to date, that they're going to do any kind of obtrusive advertising.
And look at DVR's from cable companies. They may not be as great as a Tivo, but guess what, the subscription numbers are rising, and cable companies are somehow making money off of them, and they charge less than what Tivo does.Because they DVR fees is ON TOP of the standard box rental fee. Their DVRs are based directly on the standard STBs. They already charge an STB rental fee - and usually a fee to rent the remote too - so they just charge the differential for having a DVR. They also have a much lower SAC. And they spread the cost of the DVR over a number of years.
Sure they may not have the T2T features or the networking features, but guess what, not everyone wants them.That's nice - do you have a point? If all you mean is that not everyone is going to buy a TiVo because some people will be happy with a cable DVR - thanks for the blinding flash of the obvious.
Another turn off to Tivo is the subscription prices. Why should someone who is content with a Comcast DVR(which has no ads) who is paying $5 a month to Comcast, want to switch to a Tivo and pay anywhere from $13-$20 a month to get basically the same DVR that they get now for $5? Not many will.Because some people DO want the extra features and a better UI. I've tried the cable DVRs. They sucked. The SA8300 is one of the worst pieces of consumer electronics I've ever had the displeasure of using. I don't even care if it worked correctly - and it didn't, it still sucked so badly I'd rather pay for a Series3 than allow it in my home. TiVo is not going to be the market leader, period. No one expects them to be. It is not going to be the cheap box that sells the most volume, it is aimed at people who want a better DVR and more features.
Also, you should keep up, Comcast has banner ads on their STBs and DVRs. They trialled them a while back, and now they're back for good it seems. Remember that Comcast and Cox also have deals with TiVo to develop and advertising platform to present ads on their STBs - independent of the TiVo software. Why do you think they did that?
And the Comcast ads are a hell of a lot more obtrusive than TiVo's.
megazone
12-11-2006, 03:39 PM
Ref version 7.3 - I rest my caseWeak case.
Over 7 years of software releases, which covers quite a number of them, you point to arguably the worst release and rest your case. What does that prove? That they can screw up like everyone else? No kidding.
We know that TiVo had partnership agreements tired to KidZone, and they'd promised it would be out in the summer. Also that the RadioShack distribution deal was directly tied to KidZone. So it looks like engineering was pressured into shipping the code before it was fully baked. Someone made a judgment call on the software being ready to ship - and decided it was good enough in light of the overall situation. Maybe that was the wrong call - or maybe delaying the software would've caused a major deal to collapse and done more damage to TiVo than shipping the software.
I don't think shipping 7.3 is going to hurt them in the long run. It is a speed bump. 8.1 seems to have fixed most of the issues, and greatly improved performance.
Mistakes happen.
Justin Thyme
12-11-2006, 03:45 PM
Big deal. It's unobtrusive. Some people will watch. Tivo can deploy to all shows for one advertiser.
That seems to sum it up for most folks.
Rogers says ad-skipping has become so rampant that a broadcast network CEO told him his company has lost $100 million in potential revenue due it. Source- (free sub) (http://publications.mediapost.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=52308)
Look- whether Tivo lives or dies/mutates into something hideous, ad skipping technology is here to stay and consumers will simply get it from other products if they can't from Tivo. Ad skipping is only going to increase with time as the technology becomes more pervasive and the advertising world will simply have to adjust. They can do this adjustment now, or they can continue to take the ignore it/ hope it will go away path. The second path simply loses money and achieves nothing. If Tivo goes away, then consumers will simply turn to MCE, MythTv, or carrier DVRs.
By proactively working to deal with the problem, Madison avenue can control events as they unfold. For one, they currently have some control about who they want to deal with. Respectively: Microsoft (MCE), video anarchists (Myth), or the carriers who are not known for playing softball on advertising deals? If you want to manage your fate, deal with the partner most maleable to your point of view.
Tivo.
HDTiVo
12-11-2006, 04:16 PM
It all looks perfectly reasonable to me.
I don't get why someone wouldn't have RtRNR sitting on their hard drive waiting to be watched using TiVoToCome
Originally Posted by Tom Rogers in Media Daily News
Rogers says ad-skipping has become so rampant that a broadcast network CEO told him his company has lost $100 million in potential revenue due it. Source- (free sub)
$100M doesn't sound like much...this year they'll probably reinstate those revenues with DVR views counting toward eyeballs.
ZeoTiVo
12-11-2006, 05:02 PM
There have been plenty of threads here about people cancelling Tivo and going to cable company DVR's or Media Edition PC's though. yet still you use the TiVo even though you "know" the ads will get worse
severoon
12-11-2006, 05:03 PM
I think that this is a mistake. Not that it's enough to turn people off TiVo, but it's simply a move in the wrong direction. It's a step down the path of hitting people with ads they don't necessarily want to see and haven't asked for, and it's based on the presumption that people don't want to see ads.
This is wrong. In fact, I want to see ads. I just don't want to see ads for things I'm not interested in. Right now, I'm buying a new car. I would like nothing more than to sit down with an indexed list of advertisements and page through them to get information on all the models I'm interested in, $20k-$40k sedans, CUVs, and SUVs. A few weeks ago I bought my wife a food processor, and my mom a toaster. I would've loved to sit down and go through the latest offerings on those and other kitchen gadgetry.
Companies should release their commercials on an RSS feed, the same ads they're pushing out to regular TV. Then TiVo could index them by keyword, company, etc, much the same way shows are currently indexed by title, actor, director, keyword, etc. I could go onto my TiVo and tell it to start downloading commercials for kitchen gadgets and cars in my area of interest, a la TiVoCast. Big plus: every time an ad is downloaded to my unit, the likelihood of my buying that item is far higher than if TiVo randomly tacks it onto the end of a show, because in this case, I've actually requested it. If I have anonymous usage stats on my unit (i.e., I haven't called TiVo and turned them off, which I haven't), then if I actually view the ad, TiVo would be able to collect demographics on that, too and charge even higher ad rates. (After all, I may download all $20k-$40k sedan, CUV, and SUV ads, but I'm not going to look at Buick, Kia, etc. The ones I do view will have an even higher likelihood of resulting in a sale.)
The fact is that TiVo and other companies could make my shopping much easier by delivering this kind of content.
Billy66
12-11-2006, 05:16 PM
severoon,
THAT is an idea! A good one.
Anybody listening?
I'm looking at the screen shot of the delete screen...Are people claiming the text that says "Win a Home for the Holidays" is an ad?
It looks like a voluntary shortcut to view an ad to me.
People are seriously upset at having to view 6 words?
-samk-
I'm looking at the screen shot of the delete screen...Are people claiming the text that says "Win a Home for the Holidays" is an ad?
It looks like a voluntary shortcut to view an ad to me.
People are seriously upset at having to view 6 words?
-samk-
Yet put those same six words in an email and you'd call it spam....
This sort of thing won't make our TiVos cheaper but it certainly cheapens our TiVos.
Yet put those same six words in an email and you'd call it spam....
This sort of thing won't make our TiVos cheaper but it certainly cheapens our TiVos.
Ahh - but that analogy is imperfect, because this isn't an additional email you have received, but a text banner that does not alter the reading/sending of email behavious you were previously used to.
psyton
12-11-2006, 06:20 PM
Ahh - but that analogy is imperfect, because this isn't an additional email you have received, but a text banner that does not alter the reading/sending of email behavious you were previously used to.
Then how about this analogy - your email provider sticks the text banner onto each of your incoming emails - still ok with it?
Additionally, I argue the tivo banner does alter the reading that one was previously used to.
Ahh - but that analogy is imperfect, because this isn't an additional email you have received, but a text banner that does not alter the reading/sending of email behavious you were previously used to.
You're correct. The analogy is imperfect. In my email program I can mark such things as junk and be done with them never to see them again. The same with banner ads in my web browser. I have no such option here.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 06:22 PM
Just thought of this. How do you feel about movies and the ads in front of them and I am not just talking about the trailers. Do you not go to movies anymore (I rarely go myself, I have BBO and Tivo with on-campus movie channel plus free movies each week on-campus so I am pretty set) or do you show up like 10 min into the start to skip all the ads and trailers?
I probably see 1 or 2 movies a year in the theater; there's plenty of reasons I already hate going to most theaters and thus don't.
But I also look at it like this: I know they go on for at least 10 minutes past the advertised showtime (or whatever for the specific chain) and I simply act accordingly. I can cut it close by arriving in the auditorium 10 minutes past the advertised showtime or if I have nothing better to do and arrive early can just go sit and watch stuff displayed onscreen; ads or trailers or trivia, et. al.
Back when I lived in Orlando some 13 years ago I did theater performance evaluations for LucasFilm, so I saw a lot of movies. But they were usually for studios that prohibit theaters from running commercial advertisements, and even from studios that prohibit theaters from altering any of the previews or their order prior to the film; these were all things I had to specifically detail in the reports. So I also tended to know the ins and outs of that, which chains did ads and which kept the theater experience more Hollywood, and gravitated towards those chains that didn't clutter up the experience with excessive advertising.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 06:25 PM
I'm not paying more - even if I bought a new box today I wouldn't, because I'd buy 3-years pre-paid. If someone else wants to buy 1-year monthly, let them.
And I just don't look at it like you do. I see the ad revenue as helping keep the subscription fees from being even higher. I think *everyone* is compensated for the ads already.
It's still arguably a price increase since there's the future value of money that you now have to spend today to consider.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 06:28 PM
Ahh - but that analogy is imperfect, because this isn't an additional email you have received, but a text banner that does not alter the reading/sending of email behavious you were previously used to.
Try to NOT read it when that screen appears.
Try to NOT read it when that screen appears.
You missed the point.
You can continue to read and sen .... gahh, never mind, you're one of those doomsday, slippery slope types anyway.
BTW, got my old B&W kid avatar archived somewhere? Would be appreciated :)
GoHokies!
12-11-2006, 07:00 PM
Ref version 7.3 - I rest my case
That's a pretty weak case, then since it clearly wasn't lack of testing that caused the 7.3 issue. Nice try, care to give it another shot?
I already know the answer from experiance, [sic] it will not be enough. Why? Because if Tivo is only getting paid when they are viewed, giving the option to view them isn't enough, they will eventually have to force us to watch them. And right now, I have never watched any ads that appear on my Tivo DVR. And I know I am not alone in that either. I have no interest in the ads regardless of what they are for.
What, do you have a time machine or something? How can your experience tell you how this latest feature is going to work? If that were the case, advertisers every where should just quit, since you don't watch them, right?
TiVo ads have increased TiVo's service prices. My whole point was that the advertising should decrease them.
That's BS. First of all there is no way that you can draw any cause and effect in between the two events. Second, do you really think that Tivo should lower their prices and decrease their revenue stream given their current financial position? That's the dumbest thing I've heard in this thread (and that's a pretty tall order).
That's a pretty weak case, then since it clearly wasn't lack of testing that caused the 7.3 issue. Nice try, care to give it another shot?
OK then lack of quality control. Whether it was due to lack of testing or blatant disregard for the results thereof the result was the same - they promulgated garbage on their user base. Sorry, I don't buy kidzone deadlines or any other argument as sufficient justification for that action.
GoHokies!
12-11-2006, 07:19 PM
OK then lack of quality control. Whether it was due to lack of testing or blatant disregard for the results thereof the result was the same - they promulgated garbage on their user base. Sorry, I don't buy kidzone deadlines or any other argument as sufficient justification for that action.
Are you unable to read? Tivo had an agreement to ship 7.3 with KZ when they did. They did the best job getting out the bugs as they could with the time that they had. Or, are you implying that Tivo should just fail to live up to their comittments and get taken to court?
In any event, that's one software release out of many, and it's already been fixed. Can we move on now?
Are you unable to read? Tivo had an agreement to ship 7.3 with KZ when they did. They did the best job getting out the bugs as they could with the time that they had. Or, are you implying that Tivo should just fail to live up to their comittments and get taken to court?
In any event, that's one software release out of many, and it's already been fixed. Can we move on now?
I read quite well actually. You suggested another shot. I made it and stand by it.
Yes, lets move on.
Einselen
12-11-2006, 07:44 PM
Yes, lets move on.
I say we move to China!
jmoak
12-11-2006, 07:52 PM
Hate it, hate it, hate it. Yes, it's just one line, one email, one button press, NOW. Slippery slope, people.We've gone from just one line, one email, one button press to ... well, one line, one email, one button press.... and it only took five years. (http://archive.tivocommunity.com/tivo-vb/showthread.php?postid=36839#post36839)
Gotta watch them slippery slopes folks.
pdhenry
12-11-2006, 08:30 PM
If I ever ended up with one, it'd go back.good luck with that.
"Hello, I'd like to return this DVD that I bought yesterday and have opened..."
Are you unable to read? Tivo had an agreement to ship 7.3 with KZ when they did. They did the best job getting out the bugs as they could with the time that they had. Or, are you implying that Tivo should just fail to live up to their comittments and get taken to court?
I missed this one. Can you elaborate (and/or provide links)? Who did TiVo had a agreement with, and who would take TiVo to court if they missed deadline? Did somebody pay for KidZone development? More info would be appreciated.
Y-ASK
12-11-2006, 08:50 PM
Can't somebody just say "I don't like the forced advertisements" whether they're talking about the yellow star, the FF pop-ups, or this new form of ads? I happen to dis-like any ads when I'm paying for a service, but I understand Tivo is trying to make money. It makes you wonder where all the millions of dollars are going if they can't even break even on millions of subs. Could it be that Tivo is not lean enough? Piss poor Management? Dumbass corp. type in charge? Who knows what the reason is but in my opinion it's the same old pro-shareholder - anti-customer Tivo Inc.
Y-ASK
dswallow
12-11-2006, 08:58 PM
good luck with that.
"Hello, I'd like to return this DVD that I bought yesterday and have opened..."
Point me to a DVD with mandatory ads on it that I can buy.
greg_burns
12-11-2006, 09:00 PM
Point me to a DVD with mandatory ads on it that I can buy.
I thought a lot of the new DVD's were like that. Can't skip 'em. Just like the FBI warning. :confused:
Or are these just rental ones I get? Is that your point?
Edit: reread that portion of this thread. Disregard. :o
pdhenry
12-11-2006, 09:04 PM
Point me to a DVD with mandatory ads on it that I can buy.Point me to a store that permits returning opened DVDs other than exchanging for the same title.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 09:04 PM
I thought a lot of the new DVD's were like that. Can't skip 'em. Just like the FBI warning. :confused:
Or are these just rental ones I get? Is that your point?
I'm guessing they're mostly rental related issues; I buy DVDs regularly and have never run into this on any I've bought.
dswallow
12-11-2006, 09:05 PM
Point me to a store that permits returning opened DVDs other than exchanging for the same title.
I'll be happy to if you'll give me a DVD title to go buy that'll have this problem so I can return it and prove to you it's possible.
ZeoTiVo
12-11-2006, 09:07 PM
Can't somebody just say "I don't like the forced advertisements" whether they're talking about the yellow star, the FF pop-ups, or this new form of ads? Y-ASKif they were forced ads I would hate them, but I have not found any of them to force me to do anything so I do not see them as forced ads
mattack
12-11-2006, 09:41 PM
I have no problems with ads being there; as long as some key on the remote lets me skip immediately past them to the main menu.
Not directly to the main menu, but *USUALLY*, on DVDs with "unskippable" ads, you can:
1) hit chapter-forward one or a bunch of times to get to the menu
or
2) hit stop then play to get to the menu
even when the 'dvd menu' button is blocked.
Not always, some are completely locked, and those tick me off.. though my XS32 sometimes lets me FF when a 'regular' DVD player wouldn't let me FF.. and I can see the time bar for how long it's going to play so that probably makes me slightly less annoyed than an indeterminate wait.
HDTiVo
12-11-2006, 09:49 PM
I think that this is a mistake. Not that it's enough to turn people off TiVo, but it's simply a move in the wrong direction. It's a step down the path of hitting people with ads they don't necessarily want to see and haven't asked for, and it's based on the presumption that people don't want to see ads.
This is wrong. In fact, I want to see ads. I just don't want to see ads for things I'm not interested in. Right now, I'm buying a new car. I would like nothing more than to sit down with an indexed list of advertisements and page through them to get information on all the models I'm interested in, $20k-$40k sedans, CUVs, and SUVs. A few weeks ago I bought my wife a food processor, and my mom a toaster. I would've loved to sit down and go through the latest offerings on those and other kitchen gadgetry.
Companies should release their commercials on an RSS feed, the same ads they're pushing out to regular TV. Then TiVo could index them by keyword, company, etc, much the same way shows are currently indexed by title, actor, director, keyword, etc. I could go onto my TiVo and tell it to start downloading commercials for kitchen gadgets and cars in my area of interest, a la TiVoCast. Big plus: every time an ad is downloaded to my unit, the likelihood of my buying that item is far higher than if TiVo randomly tacks it onto the end of a show, because in this case, I've actually requested it. If I have anonymous usage stats on my unit (i.e., I haven't called TiVo and turned them off, which I haven't), then if I actually view the ad, TiVo would be able to collect demographics on that, too and charge even higher ad rates. (After all, I may download all $20k-$40k sedan, CUV, and SUV ads, but I'm not going to look at Buick, Kia, etc. The ones I do view will have an even higher likelihood of resulting in a sale.)
The fact is that TiVo and other companies could make my shopping much easier by delivering this kind of content.
Sounds a bit like Product Watch to me, which I guess everyone else has forgotten about by now. ;)
dswallow
12-11-2006, 09:52 PM
BTW, got my old B&W kid avatar archived somewhere? Would be appreciated :)
http://www.2150.com/tcforum/avatar/D64EB8EF7C1770DD.jpg http://www.2150.com/tcforum/avatar/2C3A610BE93FF535.jpg
I didn't miss the point. :)
HDTiVo
12-11-2006, 09:53 PM
It's still arguably a price increase since there's the future value of money that you now have to spend today to consider.
No, Mega was right - he's not paying more, he's just getting less - less time that is for his $299 which used to buy Lifetime.
See there was no price increase, just time compression. :p
HDTiVo
12-11-2006, 09:57 PM
Who knows what the reason is but in my opinion it's the same old pro-shareholder ... Tivo Inc.
Y-ASK
Pro which shareholder?????????????
Y-ASK
12-12-2006, 01:26 PM
Pro which shareholder?????????????
Maybe not clear but I was refering to the corporate mentality that tries to put the shareholders above all else. Screw the employees, screw the customers, screw everything but the bottomline. Squeeze everything you can and show the most profit possible even if that means fudging the books a little with rebates, etc. Never mind running a sound company with happy employees and customers...
Y-ASK
Stormspace
12-12-2006, 01:37 PM
I'm guessing they're mostly rental related issues; I buy DVDs regularly and have never run into this on any I've bought.
You have to be quick, but if you miss a few second window to hit the menu button some DVD's will roll out a series of trailers that can't be skipped.
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 02:01 PM
Maybe not clear but I was refering to the corporate mentality that tries to put the shareholders above all else. Screw the employees, screw the customers, screw everything but the bottomline. Squeeze everything you can and show the most profit possible even if that means fudging the books a little with rebates, etc. Never mind running a sound company with happy employees and [s]customers...
Y-ASK
When have you ever seen TiVo do that?
Y-ASK
12-12-2006, 02:11 PM
How would I? I don't work for Tivo, but I have seen the corporate pattern before and have been a victim of it. Had a CEO that was totally clueless. Watched almost 70% of the most talented, brightest people leave (Company size of about 300) because he didn't know how to run a company. His only saving grace was that after he ran everybody off and pissed off most of his customers he was able to negotiate the selling of the business to a very large company. It is still my belief today that the larger company purchased the company I worked for based on the great name that once was and they got suckered.
Y-ASK
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 02:17 PM
How would I? I don't work for Tivo, but I have seen the corporate pattern before and have been a victim of it. Had a CEO that was totally clueless. Watched almost 70% of the most talented, brightest people leave (Company size of about 300) because he didn't know how to run a company. His only saving grace was that after he ran everybody off and pissed off most of his customers he was able to negotiate the selling of the business to a very large company. It is still my belief today that the larger company purchased the company I worked for based on the great name that once was and they got suckered.
Y-ASK
That is different and better than what you said earlier.
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:05 PM
Try to NOT read it when that screen appears.
That's a problem for people? I don't even read what's on the screen NOW - my fingers know what to do without me even looking. I do it so fast that the screen doesn't even get time to fully paint before I delete and return to the menu.
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:08 PM
This is wrong. In fact, I want to see ads. I just don't want to see ads for things I'm not interested in. Right now, I'm buying a new car. I would like nothing more than to sit down with an indexed list of advertisements and page through them to get information on all the models I'm interested in, $20k-$40k sedans, CUVs, and SUVs. A few weeks ago I bought my wife a food processor, and my mom a toaster. I would've loved to sit down and go through the latest offerings on those and other kitchen gadgetry.TiVo already has this - Product Watch, under MPP&M. Content is limited, but that's the direction they'd like to go in. They need to get more advertisers to sign up.
I've watched a number of things out of there myself.
Einselen
12-12-2006, 06:10 PM
Try to NOT read it when that screen appears.
Just watched CSI: Miami last night and it had an "ad" at the bottom of the delete screen and I admit I almost missed it. I then saw it and was like hmm let me play it. It was an "ad" for some show on Court TV about the people who come in and profile the criminal. Interesting show, I almost wanted to Tivo it.
Also all these "ads" are showcases, so when the Gold Star at the bottom of TiVo Central appeared was their an uproar about that? (Of which I love and have watched many of the Showcase Stars before)
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:12 PM
Then how about this analogy - your email provider sticks the text banner onto each of your incoming emails - still ok with it?You mean like Yahoo does on their mailing lists? Never bothers me. I don't even read them, or really notice their there. Just like I tend not to read sigs either.
Or how Gmail puts ads on the screen? Almost forgot about those.
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:17 PM
It's still arguably a price increase since there's the future value of money that you now have to spend today to consider.But 3-years prepaid is not LESS than it was before 11/05. Even without the 3-for-2 special on right now. So how is that an increase? Even with the future value of money.
I did a table of the pricing changes, most permutations dropped in total cost. Only 3 went up measurably.
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:18 PM
Also all these "ads" are showcases, so when the Gold Star at the bottom of TiVo Central appeared was their an uproar about that?Oh hell yes. People went nuts about it - it was the End of Days for TiVo. Any moment TiVo was going to start force feeding us ads. Slippery Slope!
In other words, EXACTLY the same reactions as to this change.
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:24 PM
No, Mega was right - he's not paying more, he's just getting less - less time that is for his $299 which used to buy Lifetime.
See there was no price increase, just time compression. :pThe context was the 11/05 price changes. Not the lifetime drop earlier in the year. Yes, that's clearly an effective increase since $299 bought lifetime and now it buys 3 years - and normally only 2 years. 3 years is normally $349, but it is on sale for $299.
But the shuffling on 11/05 produced more net decreases than net increases.
megazone
12-12-2006, 06:26 PM
Point me to a DVD with mandatory ads on it that I can buy.I'll have to check specific discs, but Disney DVDs used to have forced trailers - but then they did a 180 and made them kid friendly where they actually auto-play the movie an you have to deliberately go to the menu if you want it.
A number of anime DVDs I own have unskippable trailers for other titles at the start of the disc, before you get to the menu. Chapter skip, the menu button, etc, locked out. Except on one player I have that's hacked to ignore those instructions.
Einselen
12-12-2006, 06:32 PM
Oh hell yes. People went nuts about it - it was the End of Days for TiVo. Any moment TiVo was going to start force feeding us ads. Slippery Slope!
In other words, EXACTLY the same reactions as to this change.
That is what I thought. Well to add to the slippery slope look they did the promo, now they are adding it to the delete screen. Next is the season pass screen, then the screen to record shows, then the wish list screen. Well damn I just don't know when it will stop. Soon I might as well just have a Tivo to be able to fast forward through the TV shows to watch the commercials.
Oh hell yes. People went nuts about it - it was the End of Days for TiVo. Any moment TiVo was going to start force feeding us ads. Slippery Slope!
In other words, EXACTLY the same reactions as to this change.
Reaction was much stronger. And "slippery slope" people were correct, Tivo has been trying to "feed" us ads. It just fortunate for us that advertisers are not willing to pay for "non-intrusive" advertisement that doesn't get results. Till this day TiVo didn't make "material" profit on any type of advertisement they tried.
psyton
12-12-2006, 07:11 PM
You mean like Yahoo does on their mailing lists? Never bothers me. I don't even read them, or really notice their there. Just like I tend not to read sigs either.
Or how Gmail puts ads on the screen? Almost forgot about those.
Ahhh, but you're not playing by the analogy rules laid out earlier. You're not comparing apples to apples; you don't pay for those. Let me try to bring you back to the point, clarify it even more and pin you down a bit, may I?
Would you be fine if your paid ISP tack ads onto each incoming email on your personal ISP email account, which was paid for, not free? To make the analogy even more similar, your ISP is struggling to turn a profit, then increases your rates by upwards of 40% _and_ also started to tacked ads onto your email through this paid for email account? Still fine with it?
If the ISP said "Those of you who commit to staying with us for 3 years pay NOTHING extra:, and if I liked the ISP like I like TiVo ... heck, yeah - I'd stay :)
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 07:27 PM
Also all these "ads" are showcases, so when the Gold Star at the bottom of TiVo Central appeared was their an uproar about that? (Of which I love and have watched many of the Showcase Stars before)
So this is just another link to Showcases or Yellow Stars?
No, but I got pissed when they dropped the TiVo-SloMo combo that got me into Messages & Settings, so I had to navagate around the Yellow Star to get there...though I never said much about it.
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 07:40 PM
I did a table of the pricing changes, most permutations dropped in total cost. Only 3 went up measurably.
Which three? The three cheapest? ;)
How do you figure total cost dropped when the boxes dropped only ($40)-$70 and the commitments locked you in for 1 or 2 more years at $14.95 or $12.95?
My takes were a bit different:
A Little Help with TiVo’s New Pricing - The Bundle Story (http://hdtivo.wordpress.com/2006/11/12/a-little-help-with-tivo%e2%80%99s-new-pricing-the-bundle-story/)
A Little Help with TiVo’s New Pricing - The Retail Angle (http://hdtivo.wordpress.com/2006/11/11/a-little-help-with-tivo%e2%80%99s-new-pricing-the-retail-angle/)
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 07:42 PM
Reaction was much stronger. And "slippery slope" people were correct, Tivo has been trying to "feed" us ads. It just fortunate for us that advertisers are not willing to pay for "non-intrusive" advertisement that doesn't get results. Till this day TiVo didn't make "material" profit on any type of advertisement they tried.
Its an interesting thought to contemplate what we might be dealing with if TiVo were to be successful selling ads.
megazone
12-12-2006, 08:25 PM
How do you figure total cost dropped when the boxes dropped only ($40)-$70 and the commitments locked you in for 1 or 2 more years at $14.95 or $12.95?Like so. (http://blog.tivolovers.com/373587.html)
megazone
12-12-2006, 08:35 PM
Ahhh, but you're not playing by the analogy rules laid out earlier. You're not comparing apples to apples; you don't pay for those. Let me try to bring you back to the point, clarify it even more and pin you down a bit, may I?
Would you be fine if your paid ISP tack ads onto each incoming email on your personal ISP email account, which was paid for, not free? To make the analogy even more similar, your ISP is struggling to turn a profit, then increases your rates by upwards of 40% _and_ also started to tacked ads onto your email through this paid for email account? Still fine with it?That's not apples to apples either, since I'm not paying TiVo a dime more today than I was before 11/05. And if I bought a new box today I'd pay them LESS than I would had I bought it before 11/05. TiVo only raised their prices for a minority of possible product & service permutations, they decreased prices on more permutations than they raised them on. See also. (http://blog.tivolovers.com/373587.html) But even if that weren't the case - no, I don't have a problem with them raising prices AND adding more ads. If that's what it takes to stay in business, so be it. I, frankly, don't see why one should be related to the other. More revenue is more revenue. If the goal is X revenue and they can bring in Y from higher rates and Z from ads, I think that's better than getting all of it from Y, frankly. Not in absolute terms, but when implemented rationally and unobtrusively. For me these ads do absolutely nothing to harm my user experience, and I may even watch some of them willingly.
But yeah, if the ISPs policy was always to be partly ad supported, no problem. If I signed up for an ad free service (which TiVo has NEVER been), then I might not feel the same way, depending on how it was implemented.
Frankly I don't think the email analogy works anyway. TiVo has always had ads as part of their business model.
megazone
12-12-2006, 08:35 PM
So this is just another link to Showcases or Yellow Stars?Pretty much, yeah.
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 08:39 PM
Like so. (http://blog.tivolovers.com/373587.html)
I see; you do it by not considering the cost after the initial commitment is up or assigning any cost to increased commitment periods.
megazone
12-12-2006, 08:45 PM
I see; you do it by not considering the cost after the initial commitment is up or assigning any cost to increased commitment periods.I think the increased commitment periods are a red herring. How many people would be terminating the service vs. how many would continue using the service anyway, commitment or no? TiVo has a .9-1.0% churn rate. Very few people terminate the service. I don't think a 2- or 3-year commitment is a problem at all. And the 1-year commitment isn't new, that was the minimum before as well.
Under the current plan terms, when the term is up you may as well toss the box and get a new one with a new plan.
psyton
12-12-2006, 11:00 PM
If I signed up for an ad free service (which TiVo has NEVER been), then I might not feel the same way, depending on how it was implemented.
Frankly I don't think the email analogy works anyway. TiVo has always had ads as part of their business model.
Tsk, tsk, tsk. Young grasshopper, you're mistaken. Gather round while I tell you of a wonderful place that existed a long time ago. A place known as ad-free tivo. You see, in the beginning, there were no ads, none, nada; not even the hint of them. Then something horrible happened one day, I believe it was around version 2.5.something, where the first ad appeared in the form of a star (or something like that, too long ago I can't hardly remember anymore). The rest is history. You can ask around for the details... And yes, I've been a customer that long.
But I think I've made my point to those who can understand it, and I will now step back out of the affray and back into the comfort of my lurking hole...
Ah yes, the golden memories of Tivo 1.0. Let's go back to that, ad-free.
-smak-
dswallow
12-12-2006, 11:10 PM
Oh hell yes. People went nuts about it - it was the End of Days for TiVo. Any moment TiVo was going to start force feeding us ads. Slippery Slope!
In other words, EXACTLY the same reactions as to this change.
And see... we continue down the slope. Just at TiVo development speed rather than the speed of gravity.
:p
psyton
12-12-2006, 11:12 PM
Ah yes, the golden memories of Tivo 1.0. Let's go back to that, ad-free.
You seem to imply that the software would have been stagnant without the insertion of ads. Why would the software not have evolved without the ads?
I sure am glad not all software and/or hardware platforms work under your business model, I'd be stuck w/ ad-driven everything. :rolleyes:
pdhenry
12-12-2006, 11:20 PM
Why would the software not have evolved without the ads? Given that we've moved on to slippery slopes, it might be worth obvserving that the software doesn't evolve without TiVo Inc being around to evolve the software...
Even without continued software evolution TiVo owners have a vested interest in TiVo Inc being a going concern.
dswallow
12-12-2006, 11:36 PM
Given that we've moved on to slippery slopes, it might be worth obvserving that the software doesn't evolve without TiVo Inc being around to evolve the software...
Even without continued software evolution TiVo owners have a vested interest in TiVo Inc being a going concern.
Actually it would continue to evolve because of certain things TiVo would do should they become insolvent and no buyer steps up to continue operations and development. So if TiVo fails, it'd be best for everyone if they fail so miserably they don't get bought/absorbed. :)
HDTiVo
12-12-2006, 11:48 PM
I think the increased commitment periods are a red herring. How many people would be terminating the service vs. how many would continue using the service anyway, commitment or no? TiVo has a .9-1.0% churn rate. Very few people terminate the service. I don't think a 2- or 3-year commitment is a problem at all. And the 1-year commitment isn't new, that was the minimum before as well.
Under the current plan terms, when the term is up you may as well toss the box and get a new one with a new plan.
Well, you may think it is a red-herring, but I quantify the dollar amount of the additional commitment in my review, and that ability (option) to decide not to continue after yr 1 is worth something - a bit different to each person. So is the loss of the ability to re-up for only a year at a decent price (12.95/6.95) instead of 3 yrs (or 1/2 yrs at much higher prices.)
As for the disposable boxes...this is TiVo's dirty little secret in all this. Guess what churn will be when everyone does what you say... 3%, 5%? Not that that will actually happen to that extent, but... A real sh1tty deal for TiVo on the NPV of a sub. ;)
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 08:49 AM
Well, you may think it is a red-herring, but I quantify the dollar amount of the additional commitment in my review, and that ability (option) to decide not to continue after yr 1 is worth something - a bit different to each person. So is the loss of the ability to re-up for only a year at a decent price (12.95/6.95) instead of 3 yrs (or 1/2 yrs at much higher prices.)
As for the disposable boxes...this is TiVo's dirty little secret in all this. Guess what churn will be when everyone does what you say... 3%, 5%? Not that that will actually happen to that extent, but... A real sh1tty deal for TiVo on the NPV of a sub. ;)
TiVo's model back during lifetime was that evolving hardware would make people give up using lifetime boxes as they moved to newer boxes. That did not happen and the S1 is still around and using up TiVo resources from their perspective.
Given that many people keep their boxes, even with monthly subs I think the cost of not having a choice to re-up or not after 1 year is near enough 0 as to not be worth accounting for. Also the non-lifetime model is tied to the person, not the box so new TiVo hardware is much easier to move to and attains that old elusive business goal of shedding older hardware and its related support costs.
Sure those subsidized new hardware boxes will effect NPV but the bottom line also includes the back-end support costs and R&D hassles/costs of providing features across a too broad spectrum of hardware. No idea how that balances out myself but your analysis is just not complete without such numbers.
The email analogy falls down somewhat because the ad on each email increases storage space of all the emails. Also does this happen on outgoing emails? but the real kicker to that analogy is that there are many alternative Email services that are essentially the same commodity service that can feed to whatever email software you choose and the email software on your PC is what differentiates the service of email for most users.
There are alternatives to TiVo as well. My question still stands.
for all those posting how TiVo is getting worse and the slippery slope is clear, Why are you still using TiVo??
Y-ASK
12-13-2006, 09:37 AM
There are alternatives to TiVo as well. My question still stands.
for all those posting how TiVo is getting worse and the slippery slope is clear, Why are you still using TiVo??
HELLO! Because the Tivo user interface is signficantly better than any of the alternatives. Some are getting closer but for overall functionality Tivo is the best in the Biz. It's Tivo Inc. that is getting worse...
And for those of you who keep saying Tivo has always had the idea of selling Ads as part of their Biz Model (only in fine print mind you), don't you think it kind of ridiculous of them to try and advertise a product using the fact you can FF thru advertisements in order to attractive customers who dislike Ads only to then force feed them unobtrusive Ads while they pay for said service?
And YES Zeo, no matter what semantics you want to use, if an Ad is placed where you can see it daily (I.E. Yellow Star on main menu) then you are talking about Forced Advertisements. Put the Ads in a folder (Buried Deep and not on the main menu screen) that a customer would have to navigate to and then send ONE notice telling everyone that there are Advertisements there and let them choose to go a see them if they want, then that would not be forced advertisements.
We told you all along time ago that this was the sort of BS that would be coming
Billy66
12-13-2006, 09:39 AM
There are alternatives to TiVo as well. My question still stands.
for all those posting how TiVo is getting worse and the slippery slope is clear, Why are you still using TiVo??
Because they're slipping now and have not yet fallen?
Seriously, what does this mean? if they aren't just tickled at the idea that they should cancel now? I think the expression of dissatisfaction and concern come before outright walking out. YMMV.
Why should the user base not be concerned? What has TiVo really done to show they value subscription holders over their advertising or network partners? Why should anyone think that if TiVo could be successful selling any type of advertising that they wouldn't continue?
TiVo's incompetence at finding a way to advertise and generate profit from that might be the only thing holding them back.
Stormspace
12-13-2006, 10:28 AM
Because they're slipping now and have not yet fallen?
Seriously, what does this mean? if they aren't just tickled at the idea that they should cancel now? I think the expression of dissatisfaction and concern come before outright walking out. YMMV.
Why should the user base not be concerned? What has TiVo really done to show they value subscription holders over their advertising or network partners? Why should anyone think that if TiVo could be successful selling any type of advertising that they wouldn't continue?
TiVo's incompetence at finding a way to advertise and generate profit from that might be the only thing holding them back.
One of my concerns is that while advertising on the TiVo has increased our sub rates have not gone down. Also while I did not buy the TiVo to skip commercials, it is a nice feature and certainly one that TiVo advocated early on.
ufo4sale
12-13-2006, 10:40 AM
I can't belive some of the post i'm reading. Why do people hate advertising so much? No matter what you do or where you go there will also be advertising. At least TiVo is trying to make it as unobtrusive as possible.
Just wait till the future where you'll get ads in your dreams. ;)
bmgoodman
12-13-2006, 11:10 AM
Advertising doesn't seem like it could possibly pay much. I only volunteer to view a tiny number of offerings. Mostly because there have been few interesting ones. I don't mind ads being offered, though, so long as they stay relatively unintrusive. (Your definition may vary.)
I think Tivo should have worked on getting the fees down. Boxes should only get minor updates. Major new versions should only go on new boxes. Let people who want cool new features go out and buy new boxes. Those who don't can just stick with what they have. Don't go for long term commitments. Perhaps include a small activation fee to keep users from dropping and adding too frequently.
Of course, you could say Tivo tried this a little bit when attempting to sell "TivoToGo" originally, and few people went for it. Was it a bad approach, or just ahead of its time? Just a few short years ago, people were not really paying for downloaded music or using home networks (aside from perhaps sharing the Internet connection) or buying mini-NAS devices. Maybe the premium approach would work better today, but I admit it's just a maybe.
I do wonder if Tivo has too many engineers? Too many senior folks with large salaries? Huge California property costs and taxes? Could Tivo survive better in Utah? Iowa?
Most of us here want Tivo to succeed. It seems very difficult to build your DVR empire on the payments of such a relatively small user base. I don't envy their choices right now, but I do feel that any time those choices alienate your most fervent supporters, you lose a LOT of your "ambassadors". I "sell" far fewer Tivos now than at any time in the past 6 years. I also give fewer. I've pretty much stopped even talking about Tivo, because the strategies have become like shifting sand. Tivo is no longer "in love" with its oldest, most ardent supporters. There seems to be no new strategy for retaining loyalty. (It seems that inflation has really eroded rewards points. Frankly, I'd LOVE to see a "box lifetime" reward added for 30-50,000 points. Really, is it so hard to give one person a "lifetime" reward for selling 10 Tivos?)
End ramble.
I can't belive some of the post i'm reading. Why do people hate advertising so much? No matter what you do or where you go there will also be advertising. At least TiVo is trying to make it as unobtrusive as possible.
Just wait till the future where you'll get ads in your dreams. ;)
Your third sentence answers your second!
MickeS
12-13-2006, 11:24 AM
Advertising doesn't seem like it could possibly pay much.
That's a joke, right? :D
HDTiVo
12-13-2006, 11:30 AM
HELLO! Because the Tivo user interface is signficantly better than any of the alternatives. Some are getting closer but for overall functionality Tivo is the best in the Biz. It's Tivo Inc. that is getting worse...
Exactly.
Oh, and pretty funny that now that hardware transition is more likely, the offering that should work best in that environment is gone, replaced by one that shouldn't work in that environment and probably will generate future losses as big or bigger than any seen before.
That's TiVo for you. :(
HDTiVo
12-13-2006, 11:40 AM
One of my concerns is that while advertising on the TiVo has increased our sub rates have not gone down. Also while I did not buy the TiVo to skip commercials, it is a nice feature and certainly one that TiVo advocated early on.
TiVo only gets around .25-.35 a month in ad revenue. The business lines that could generate other revenues (incl. ads and DOD) have not developed, for several reasons which are mostly TiVo's fault. So that opportunity for reduction in service fee has not really materialized.
Instead of getting fees down, TiVo is working on getting them up along with their up-front costs (SAC). Doesn't make any sense.
bmgoodman
12-13-2006, 11:50 AM
That's a joke, right? :D
Not at all. I didn't mean "advertising" in all contexts, which obviously is very lucrative. I meant how much Tivo can make off of selling ads on 2-4 million Tivo units on an OPTIONAL basis. How many people view these optional ads? Let's be generous and say that 2 million people watch a given ad. Couldn't you get that number by placing an ad in a major newspaper? How much is that worth? I don't think it's going to push Tivo into the black. Now, if there were 40 million Tivo units, getting half of them to watch an ad could be a major money maker. But does Tivo "bleed out" before they have a big enough base to support these other things?
It's easier for me to tolerate these optional ads than to tolerate miserably slow response times foisted upon us by version 7.3.1! Stuffing more and more code into these old, underpowered boxes is going to kill the goose that laid the golden egg! Is that why Tivo is so keen on these 3 year commitments? Do they have still more useless code coming that will overtax all the older boxes? Are they hoping to lock these folks in long enough to build a new base of users on faster boxes? Hope I'm wrong....
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 12:08 PM
HELLO! Because the Tivo user interface is significantly better than any of the alternatives. Some are getting closer but for overall functionality Tivo is the best in the Biz. It's Tivo Inc. that is getting worse... Hello - people are saying that the ads are taking over the interface and making it worse. This they should all go to cable company DVRs or DVD recorders that are not capable of this if it really bothered them as much as they claim here
And for those of you who keep saying Tivo has always had the idea of selling Ads as part of their Biz Model (only in fine print mind you), don't you think it kind of ridiculous of them to try and advertise a product using the fact you can FF thru advertisements in order to attractive customers who dislike Ads only to then force feed them unobtrusive Ads while they pay for said service? and now the old cr@p that should have been settled comes out. TiVo is conspicuously silent on doing anything to ads. Yellow stars were on series 1 units so the bulk of current subscribers well knew that ads were part of TiVo interface.
And YES Zeo, no matter what semantics you want to use, if an Ad is placed where you can see it daily (I.E. Yellow Star on main menu) then you are talking about Forced Advertisements. Put the Ads in a folder (Buried Deep and not on the main menu screen) that a customer would have to navigate to and then send ONE notice telling everyone that there are Advertisements there and let them choose to go a see them if they want, then that would not be forced advertisements.
We told you all along time ago that this was the sort of BS that would be coming
Fine - in your opinion the ads are forced and you do not like that TiVo does this. You are entitled to that opinion but put your money where your post is and use an alternative that does not force ads otherwise i am led to the conclusion that no one complaining about it really does think it is as bad as they say it is
dswallow
12-13-2006, 12:13 PM
Excuse me, but COMPLAINING ABOUT IT is just as valid a thing for a current or potential customer to do as is DROPPING THE SERVICE.
There's no law that says anything a company does should be met with silent acceptance. If that's how you choose to behave, more power to you. But some of us will continue to express our opinions about such things so as to ensure TiVo understands they're not moving in a direction some customers like.
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 12:28 PM
Excuse me, but COMPLAINING ABOUT IT is just as valid a thing for a current or potential customer to do as is DROPPING THE SERVICE.
There's no law that says anything a company does should be met with silent acceptance. If that's how you choose to behave, more power to you. But some of us will continue to express our opinions about such things so as to ensure TiVo understands they're not moving in a direction some customers like.
I did not say silent acceptance - and complaining in this forum is way less effective then informing TiVo they will no longer be used and then putting that into action. We see the same ids posting the same complaints every time. after a couple of years I just do not take them as serious but instead I see them as people who will do the easy complaining without taking any real action. TiVo is obviously being careful in how it does the ads with an implied rule of not amking anyone do something extra so I think TiVo has got all the message it will get from posts in the forum.
dt_dc
12-13-2006, 01:00 PM
And for those of you who keep saying Tivo has always had the idea of selling Ads as part of their Biz Model (only in fine print mind you), don't you think it kind of ridiculous of them to try and advertise a product using the fact you can FF thru advertisements in order to attractive customers who dislike Ads only to then force feed them unobtrusive Ads while they pay for said service?No, I don't.
I (mainly) dislike ads in linear TV because of the amount of my time they take ... not because of some sort of general abhorence of the thought of any advertisements on my television.
Heck, the Tivo logo all over the place is yet another ad (and more obtrusive than these telescoping ads).
Hello - people are saying that the ads are taking over the interface and making it worse. This they should all go to cable company DVRs or DVD recorders that are not capable of this if it really bothered them as much as they claim here
and now the old cr@p that should have been settled comes out. TiVo is conspicuously silent on doing anything to ads. Yellow stars were on series 1 units so the bulk of current subscribers well knew that ads were part of TiVo interface.
Fine - in your opinion the ads are forced and you do not like that TiVo does this. You are entitled to that opinion but put your money where your post is and use an alternative that does not force ads otherwise i am led to the conclusion that no one complaining about it really does think it is as bad as they say it is
This smacks of the same mentality that says if you don't like the way the government runs the country then move out and it's equally ridiculous. Far better to try to make the bathwater clean than to throw out the baby with it.
Y-ASK
12-13-2006, 01:57 PM
and complaining in this forum is way less effective then informing TiVo they will no longer be used
Stop complaining on the Tivo forum, where's the fun in that? :) These types of topics make for some of the best discussions, as long as they don't get heated...
As for stop using Tivo; I've got several thousands of dollars spent on Tivo equipment and accessories, but this is the 1st time in a long time that I have decided not purchase a new Tivo. I thought about it for a long time now and I will not be buying a Dual Tuner (although my situation is perfect for it - DirectTV receiver and Analog Cable subscriber) or an S3. Never thought I would say it but my Tivo days are numbered.
Y-ASK
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 01:58 PM
This smacks of the same mentality that says if you don't like the way the government runs the country then move out and it's equally rediculous. Far better to try to make the bathwater clean than to throw out the baby with it.
yes, but to sit around and complain about the government while not actually voting is what this thread amounts too.
dswallow
12-13-2006, 02:01 PM
I did not say silent acceptance - and complaining in this forum is way less effective then informing TiVo they will no longer be used and then putting that into action. We see the same ids posting the same complaints every time. after a couple of years I just do not take them as serious but instead I see them as people who will do the easy complaining without taking any real action. TiVo is obviously being careful in how it does the ads with an implied rule of not amking anyone do something extra so I think TiVo has got all the message it will get from posts in the forum.
Perhaps they're continuing to be careful because of the noise level among what otherwise are their devoted fanbase.
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 02:02 PM
Stop complaining on the Tivo forum, where's the fun in that? :) Y-ASK to be clear I never said to stop posting in any of my posts. I am simply challenging those that do not like this ad stuff to do more than complain in the forum, then I will see it as a serious problem that they truly do not like. Till then .............
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 02:03 PM
Perhaps they're continuing to be careful because of the noise level among what otherwise are their devoted fanbase.
good point. I am sure they get from this forum that making us change our remote control habits would be a very bad move. It does not seem though to stop this slippery slope you all are perceiving TiVo to be on with regards to ads. I would say the posts have had all the effect they are going to have.
psyton
12-13-2006, 02:05 PM
yes, but to sit around and complain about the government while not actually voting is what this thread amounts too.
No it isn't - this thread is analogous to debating the country's issues and trying to determine what the true facts are before voting, trying to see all sides and listening to everyone's viewpoint. Surely you're not suggesting you vote ill-informed, without careful and thoughtful consideration of all sides, are you? I would think that is more harmful than not voting at all...
Y-ASK
12-13-2006, 02:05 PM
yes, but to sit around and complain about the government while not actually voting is what this thread amounts too.
That is a terrible analogy. At least I don't think the Govt. is listening in on my complaining about the Govt. in the office... Last I checked Tivo employees still read this message board. Now that I've mention it: Hi Tom, fix your stupid company... :)
Y-ASK
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 02:07 PM
Surely you're not suggesting you vote ill-informed, without careful and thoughtful consideration of all sides, are you? I would think that is more harmful than not voting at all...
Surely you are not saying this thread is a careful and thoughtful cosnideration of the slippery slope.
Y-ASK
12-13-2006, 02:09 PM
Nah! We're in the middle of the slope and when this new venture doesn't pan-out then we'll be that much closer to the bottom...
Y-ASK
psyton
12-13-2006, 02:13 PM
Surely you are not saying this thread is a careful and thoughtful cosnideration of the slippery slope.
It could be if people such as yourself could even admit the opposing view has a point. How much more narrow minded is that than some of the opinions you criticize so? Seems like you're the one not giving careful and thoughtful consideration, so if you're condeming the thread because of that, you're the one to blame...
dswallow
12-13-2006, 02:14 PM
good point. I am sure they get from this forum that making us change our remote control habits would be a very bad move. It does not seem though to stop this slippery slope you all are perceiving TiVo to be on with regards to ads. I would say the posts have had all the effect they are going to have.
Do you have a cat? You know how cats like to explore, perhaps jumping up on the kitchen counter, for example, but if you're there to yell "No!" at them they'll respect the boundaries... but they keep trying. And if you're ever not there to say "No!" at them even one time when they try, they do what they please?
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they aren't trying to push the ad envelope. :)
Stormspace
12-13-2006, 02:25 PM
No it isn't - this thread is analogous to debating the country's issues and trying to determine what the true facts are before voting, trying to see all sides and listening to everyone's viewpoint. Surely you're not suggesting you vote ill-informed, without careful and thoughtful consideration of all sides, are you? I would think that is more harmful than not voting at all...
Precisely. I would rather leave the decision up to those better informed when I don't fully understand an issue rather than make a blind guess and have to live with my mistake. How many political races have people voted in where they decided their candidate wasn't what they thought? You also have to be able to take a stand on the issue with some conviction. I can't do that unless I really know the issue well.
Fortunately the ads with TiVo is easy to understand and DRM less so, yet I feel much more strongly about the latter. I know more about it than most as well. As for the ad landscape TiVo has been taking a lot without giving anything back and if they didn't think that 50% of their subs would disappear we'd be seeing much more intrusive ads from them. This is especially true given the apparent attitude of the current CEO. He has an "To hell with the customers, we have to make money" attitude. I wonder if he's an accountant.
I hate it when number crunchers are put in charge because typically they only see the immediate benefits of their actions and not the long term effects or the impact their actions have on the customer.
800.00 DVR's, 19.95/month subs...What's next?
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 02:37 PM
It could be if people such as yourself could even admit the opposing view has a point. How much more narrow minded is that than some of the opinions you criticize so? Seems like you're the one not giving careful and thoughtful consideration, so if you're condeming the thread because of that, you're the one to blame...
what I am saying is that if those who think the ads are on a slippery slope feel they really have a point then they should act on it instead of endlessly debating it.
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 02:42 PM
Precisely. . As for the ad landscape TiVo has been taking a lot without giving anything back and if they didn't think that 50% of their subs would disappear we'd be seeing much more intrusive ads from them.
and that is just my point - TiVo needs to see subs going away if you want the ads to go away.
I have cats, and I say No to them. Sometimes they stop and watch me but do not get down from whereever. I have to start getting up and then they take off. They are pushing the boundry to see how much I mean the No I just shouted.
and that is just my point - TiVo needs to see subs going away if you want the ads to go away.
I have cats, and I say No to them. Sometimes they stop and watch me but do not get down from whereever. I have to start getting up and then they take off. They are pushing the boundry to see how much I mean the No I just shouted.
Yet you don't get rid of your cats? Why not?
Stormspace
12-13-2006, 02:48 PM
There are two ways to make a change. You can leave and not endorse a thing, or you can stick with it and try to change it from the inside. When you really like things but want to make them better doing it from the inside is generally the most fulfilling route.
what I am saying is that if those who think the ads are on a slippery slope feel they really have a point then they should act on it instead of endlessly debating it.
They didn't go away when the yellow star ads came many many years ago, why would they go away now?
That old slippery slope had 100 lbs of salt dumped on it long ago, because the same type of unobtrusive ad that the yellow star was, basically one line of text, is exactly what these new ones are, one line of text.
So I guess people can whine again about slippery slopes, but so far they have evidence to the contrary that ads are going to get more intrusive, they just choose to ignore it.
-smak-
800.00 DVR's, 19.95/month subs...What's next?
Hmm, I dunno - maybe $649 DVRs and $8.30 monthly subs?
:p
They didn't go away when the yellow star ads came many many years ago, why would they go away now?
That old slippery slope had 100 lbs of salt dumped on it long ago, because the same type of unobtrusive ad that the yellow star was, basically one line of text, is exactly what these new ones are, one line of text.
So I guess people can whine again about slippery slopes, but so far they have evidence to the contrary that ads are going to get more intrusive, they just choose to ignore it.
-smak-
First yellow star. Then product watch. Now this new thing on the delete screen. Nah theres no slippery slope here.......
jmoak
12-13-2006, 03:03 PM
so five years of hollerin' at the cat has worked pretty well, eh?
we're still just talking about one line, right? we're still at the top of the slide, so far.
Please, Keep Hollerin'!! It seems to be working! Five years and counting!!!
reposting the link would just be redundant, huh
ZeoTiVo
12-13-2006, 03:19 PM
Yet you don't get rid of your cats? Why not?because my cats do what they do mostly out of a survival instinct with no malice towards me, they do indeed listen most of the time and they entertain me nightly. No complaints here.
because my cats do what they do mostly out of a survival instinct with no malice towards me, they do indeed listen most of the time and they entertain me nightly. No complaints here.
Replace "cats" with "TiVo marketing" and you got the answer to your original question. :)
BlackBetty
12-13-2006, 05:13 PM
I saw this on at the end of the most recent episode of "Friday Night Lights". It was a link to an ad for Mastercard Home for the Holidays.
I thought it was done in great taste. Well done TiVo! Keep em coming. I hope the end of every recording has an ad someday.
I saw something about Extreme Weather Reporting (hah!) at the end of the Amazing Race Finale (which was drab) recording. Kinda neat.
First yellow star. Then product watch. Now this new thing on the delete screen. Nah theres no slippery slope here.......
These are all the same thing. You have to look at one line.
People were talking about once Tivo does a yellow star, then they'll put ads all over the place, force you to see ads when pausing, in the guide, etc, etc...
Still hasn't happened.
There's no slope when you're walking a straight line.
-smak-
These are all the same thing. You have to look at one line.
People were talking about once Tivo does a yellow star, then they'll put ads all over the place, force you to see ads when pausing, in the guide, etc, etc...
Still hasn't happened.
There's no slope when you're walking a straight line.
-smak-
r
i
i
i
g
h
t
!
JohnBrowning
12-14-2006, 10:02 AM
Perhaps they're continuing to be careful because of the noise level among what otherwise are their devoted fanbase.
How do you know there is ANY significant "noise level" among the "devoted fanbase?" Are you assuming this website is a representative sample?? Seems like an erroneous assumption to me. Fanboy websites such as TCO in no way produce anything close to a statistically significant sample.
Stormspace
12-14-2006, 10:55 AM
How do you know there is ANY significant "noise level" among the "devoted fanbase?" Are you assuming this website is a representative sample?? Seems like an erroneous assumption to me. Fanboy websites such as TCO in no way produce anything close to a statistically significant sample.
Do you have any sources on this? I'd be interested in reading them. Thx. :)
Stu_Bee
12-14-2006, 12:26 PM
what I am saying is that if those who think the ads are on a slippery slope feel they really have a point then they should act on it instead of endlessly debating it.
So people that don't like what their government is doing, should leave their country rather than fight for change?
jmoak
12-14-2006, 12:54 PM
So people that don't like what their government is doing, should leave their country rather than fight for change?If tivo existed for the common good of the country and was duly created and elected by the populace, (for the people, by the people, of the people) then I'd say yes and agree with your analogy.
Barring that, I gotta reply, "DO'H!"
;)
^
|
|
(denotes a funny. A good natured rib. No ill will intended)
Stu_Bee
12-14-2006, 01:09 PM
I personally don't mind the ad's yet. I'll start to complain when they become too obtrusive...but I do understand those that wish to express their concern of the incremental steps towards blipverts (worst case geek reference) ;)
Atomike
12-14-2006, 01:29 PM
There's no slope when you're walking a straight line.
A slippery slope simply means that things get worse over time (as a very basic definition).
There are MORE ads now than there were 2 weeks ago.
There were MORE ads after the yellow stars were added.
If you are an honest person, you must admit that things are worse for people who don't like ads.
To say this is not a slippery slope shows that many people do not know what a slippery slope is.
I took my logic class in Toronto. It was called Logic 101. It was in my first year, and was surprisingly interesting. Tell us about your logic class. Be specific.
Also, don't tell me they're not obtrusive. I see them. They're obtrusive.
ZeoTiVo
12-14-2006, 01:32 PM
So people that don't like what their government is doing, should leave their country rather than fight for change?
if their idea of fighting for change is to hang out at the post office and whine about the Govt. policies then that is not much of a "fight for a change". Again I think it is just a bunch of pointless whining unless some real action is taken.
Sure people can complain all they want, that is in the Bill of rights for all citizens. My point is that every time something happens people post a ton more complaints as if that is somehow fighting this slippery slope they perceive. I say if you feel that way then do something concrete and make me/us beleive there is more to this than just another round of whiny posts same as in the past.
PS - I gave my logical demarkation form unobtrusive to intrusive. If I have to specifically change the way I watch and manage shows then that crosses the line to intrusive. Just seeing a yellow star or a thumbs up or a box with text on the interface is not intrusive. None of this changed the readability or interaction of the interface options.
If you find just seeing the ad intrusive then I promise you that posting here alone will not chnnge the fact they are on the interface. I suggest you need to take a more meaniingful action if you wish to fight for change.
Stormspace
12-14-2006, 01:54 PM
if their idea of fighting for change is to hang out at the post office and whine about the Govt. policies then that is not much of a "fight for a change". Again I think it is just a bunch of pointless whining unless some real action is taken.
Sure people can complain all they want, that is in the Bill of rights for all citizens. My point is that every time something happens people post a ton more complaints as if that is somehow fighting this slippery slope they perceive. I say if you feel that way then do something concrete and make me/us beleive there is more to this than just another round of whiny posts same as in the past.
PS - I gave my logical demarkation form unobtrusive to intrusive. If I have to specifically change the way I watch and manage shows then that crosses the line to intrusive. Just seeing a yellow star or a thumbs up or a box with text on the interface is not intrusive. None of this changed the readability or interaction of the interface options.
If you find just seeing the ad intrusive then I promise you that posting here alone will not chnnge the fact they are on the interface. I suggest you need to take a more meaniingful action if you wish to fight for change.
I've said it before that ads as implemented to date haven't been intrusive to me. The sole exception was the FF ads TiVo test drove last year. I didn't like those at all even though I could use an undocumented feature to get around them. Also I think that was a perfect example of TiVo listening to the complaints here in this forum and listening, since it was never implemented.
I also think that TiVo marketing is intelligent enough to parse the comments here on this board and others when making decisions and that in the case of the FF pop-up ads they realized they had gone too far, so they backed off.
ZeoTiVo
12-14-2006, 02:04 PM
I've said it before that ads as implemented to date haven't been intrusive to me. The sole exception was the FF ads TiVo test drove last year. I didn't like those at all even though I could use an undocumented feature to get around them. Also I think that was a perfect example of TiVo listening to the complaints here in this forum and listening, since it was never implemented.
I also think that TiVo marketing is intelligent enough to parse the comments here on this board and others when making decisions and that in the case of the FF pop-up ads they realized they had gone too far, so they backed off.
umm, no they did not - I saw one 3 weeks ago. In that case it was they did not sell many becasue the thing was barely noticieable at 2x or 3x FF and of course 30 sec skip just blows right by it.
so to review
too unobtrusive for advertisers and you did not even realize they are still there (mostly for record this new show type stuff).
Frankly I think the ads on the delete screen were some smart guy's answer to the above problem. People will be able to see the link to an ad there and lets see if we get a higher click through
Stormspace
12-14-2006, 02:13 PM
umm, no they did not - I saw one 3 weeks ago. In that case it was they did not sell many because the thing was barely noticeable at 2x or 3x FF and of course 30 sec skip just blows right by it.
so to review
too unobtrusive for advertisers and you did not even realize they are still there (mostly for record this new show type stuff).
Frankly I think the ads on the delete screen were some smart guy's answer to the above problem. People will be able to see the link to an ad there and lets see if we get a higher click through
Hmm. I don't doubt that you saw it and if I see one I'll make it a point to not use that product, going out of my way if it's required. However since I haven't seen it, nor have a heard anything about it anywhere it must not be a popular means of advertising, or they were test driving it again. If it were in active use there would be some buzz about it.
I tend to think what you saw was a glitch since no one else has seen it. ;)
ZeoTiVo
12-14-2006, 02:21 PM
Hmm. I don't doubt that you saw it and if I see one I'll make it a point to not use that product, going out of my way if it's required. However since I haven't seen it, nor have a heard anything about it anywhere it must not be a popular means of advertising, or they were test driving it again. If it were in active use there would be some buzz about it.
I tend to think what you saw was a glitch since no one else has seen it. ;)
no it was in active use, most people just don't make a big deal out of them anymore and I might have missed it save for the fact we were not FFing at the time. It was on a Wii commercial to highlight the larger Wii yellow star. I guess you need tp throw out all Nintendo products now.
I love the irony though of you hate obtrusive ads yet would go out of your way to make a simple thumbs up showing on your screen to be as obtrusive in your life as possible.
Stormspace
12-14-2006, 02:27 PM
no it was in active use, most people just don't make a big deal out of them anymore and I might have missed it save for the fact we were not FFing at the time. It was on a Wii commercial to highlight the larger Wii yellow star. I guess you need tp throw out all Nintendo products now.
I love the irony though of you hate obtrusive ads yet would go out of your way to make a simple thumbs up showing on your screen to be as obtrusive in your life as possible.
I've seen that and I agree it's not intrusive, yet it's hardly the same as the interpreter ads being displayed last year. If that's how it shook out then I can see why no one is complaining since it's really no more than an enlarged hit thumb up for more info. However if this is the same implementation there's no doubt its different than the original.
JohnBrowning
12-14-2006, 02:28 PM
Do you have any sources on this? I'd be interested in reading them. Thx. :)
Only simple common sense!!
Stormspace
12-14-2006, 02:31 PM
It was on a Wii commercial to highlight the larger Wii yellow star. I guess you need tp throw out all Nintendo products now.
I love the irony though of you hate obtrusive ads yet would go out of your way to make a simple thumbs up showing on your screen to be as obtrusive in your life as possible.
In most cases it's just a matter of walking by it and not stopping. In nintendo's case I'd have the option of going PSP since none of my kids like the new Wii. I'm hopeful none of them will want Sony however. :)
drew2k
12-14-2006, 02:33 PM
There are certainly times that I have been jealous of the features that stand-alone TiVos have ... this is not one of them.
I agree with the sentiment of many others here that the addition of ads on the Delete Program menu is obtrusive and even intrusive - just plain unsightly. Some have also speculated that there is no telling where an ad link could pop-up next. Why restrict the ad to just TiVo Central (as a Yellow-star "link") and on the Delete Program menu? Why not add an ad-link to every single menu, for even greater visibility? I don't know if will ever get to that, but when a company needs ad-revenue, what's a company to do?
Can you imagine if Microsoft started selling ad-space on the Start Menu of Windows XP?
I say if you feel that way then do something concrete and make me/us beleive there is more to this than just another round of whiny posts same as in the past.
I for one don't give a darn about making you believe anything.
PS - I gave my logical demarkation form unobtrusive to intrusive. If I have to specifically change the way I watch and manage shows then that crosses the line to intrusive. Just seeing a yellow star or a thumbs up or a box with text on the interface is not intrusive. None of this changed the readability or interaction of the interface options.
You are, of course, entitled to your opinion. Mine differs greatly.
Y-ASK
12-14-2006, 02:57 PM
if their idea of fighting for change is to hang out at the post office and whine about the Govt. policies then that is not much of a "fight for a change".
Guess you never saw Kevin Costner in the Postman. Several signficant speeches were made in front of a Post Office, but then you probably thought he was just whining about the suppression of civil rights.
Again I think it is just a bunch of pointless whining unless some real action is taken.
Great! So you don't like our whining. Say it once and then get on with the discussion. Your whining about us whining just make us whine even more about your whining which is more whining than you thought your whining would accomplish in 1st place.
All I have left to say is "WWwaaaa!" :D
Y-ASK
A slippery slope simply means that things get worse over time (as a very basic definition).
There are MORE ads now than there were 2 weeks ago.
There were MORE ads after the yellow stars were added.
If you are an honest person, you must admit that things are worse for people who don't like ads.
To say this is not a slippery slope shows that many people do not know what a slippery slope is.
I took my logic class in Toronto. It was called Logic 101. It was in my first year, and was surprisingly interesting. Tell us about your logic class. Be specific.
Also, don't tell me they're not obtrusive. I see them. They're obtrusive.
Maybe you weren't here for the discussions, but the slippery slope people were talking about were to obtrusive ads, not these totally harmless, barely notice them ads.
If you really get bent out of shape at seeing a line of text on your TV, then there's nothing really anybody can do about that.
-smak-
Einselen
12-14-2006, 04:37 PM
The way I view it is not as an ad, but as a tailored short cut to the Yellostar/Showcase. The reason I say tailored is because after CSI I got the one about the Court Investigator, after a family movie the feel good Mastercard ad is "linked". All Tivo is doing is making the end user aware and/or making it easier for them to see the showcases Tivo has already had.
Billy66
12-14-2006, 05:02 PM
All Tivo is doing is making the end user aware and/or making it easier for them to see the showcases Tivo has already had.
Now that's the feature we've all wanted. Please TiVo, make it easier for us to access the showcases. :rolleyes:
They didn't do it for us, that's for sure.
Einselen
12-14-2006, 05:05 PM
Now that's the feature we've all wanted. Please TiVo, make it easier for us to access the showcases. :rolleyes:
They didn't do it for us, that's for sure.
Well yes, but now that the users are more aware of the showcases they may get more hits and can also charge more to those who are purchasing showcase slots because 1) the ads can be targeted and 2) more of a chance people will view them
Atomike
12-14-2006, 05:49 PM
If you really get bent out of shape at seeing a line of text on your TV, then there's nothing really anybody can do about that.
Tivo can't do anything about that?
I DON'T like seeing a line of text on my TV. I want Tivo to do something about it.
I think you're missing point after point.
Tivo can't do anything about that?
I DON'T like seeing a line of text on my TV. I want Tivo to do something about it.
I think you're missing point after point.
This is part of the service. You either accept it or go elsewhere.
There were 5 million posts about the yellow star years ago, and it hasn't gone anywhere. This is all very pointless unless you put your money where your fingers are and tell Tivo with your pocketbook you don't like it.
-smak-
ZeoTiVo
12-14-2006, 08:56 PM
This is part of the service. You either accept it or go elsewhere.
There were 5 million posts about the yellow star years ago, and it hasn't gone anywhere. This is all very pointless unless you put your money where your fingers are and tell Tivo with your pocketbook you don't like it.
-smak-
+1
This is part of the service. You either accept it or go elsewhere.
No.
Nfuego
12-14-2006, 09:36 PM
I don't understand... You'd prefer Tivo to not collect any advertising revenue and just raise your monthly rates? That doesn't jibe with your "Tivo should be free" subtitle - you don't want to pay the money, and you don't want it to come from advertisers. Do you think that it just grows on trees?
And did we really need a completely different thread on the same topic?
People just think everything should be free...
Maybe we should raise taxes so everyone ELSES TiVo service will be free....
Hmmmm...the page that comes up went from 2 lines (Keep or Delete) to 3 lines.
Nobody would ever HAVE to view the 3rd line option...ever...but human nature makes us curious and that is why it is ingenious.
I can't stand complainers that complain about things that are completely optional.
Einselen
12-14-2006, 09:58 PM
I can't stand complainers that complain about things that are completely optional.
I am going to save time for people and state the counter argument even though I may or may not agree with it.
"Tivo never asked me if I wanted that extra line of text. Therefore it is not optional"
Of course, that could be said in so many variations and I am sure it will be.
mattack
12-14-2006, 10:06 PM
Do you have any sources on this? I'd be interested in reading them. Thx. :)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotlight_(logical_fallacy)
People just think everything should be free...
Maybe we should raise taxes so everyone ELSES TiVo service will be free....
Hmmmm...the page that comes up went from 2 lines (Keep or Delete) to 3 lines.
Nobody would ever HAVE to view the 3rd line option...ever...but human nature makes us curious and that is why it is ingenious.
I can't stand complainers that complain about things that are completely optional.
$322.20/year for the privilige of using 3 tivo boxes is a far cry from free my friend.
dswallow
12-14-2006, 10:11 PM
I am going to save time for people and state the counter argument even though I may or may not agree with it.
"Tivo never asked me if I wanted that extra line of text. Therefore it is not optional"
Of course, that could be said in so many variations and I am sure it will be.
TiVo's doing a great job brainwashing many of its users to accept any and all intrusive advertising and price increases all for the benefit of "saving TiVo." That's probably the one thing TiVo marketing has successfully accomplished.
I really don't see why they don't just get rid of the multi-service discount; imagine the revenue gains they could have overnight. It'll help "save TiVo" so I'm sure most won't mind. Oh wait, they've started that process already, haven't they...
I got a new program for TiVo to sell to advertisers to produce income. TiVo could sell the UI sound effects. No everytime you move the cursor your TiVo might say "iPod" and whenever you select an option it sings "Coke Is It." As TiVo gains better subscriber data from viewing habits and seeing what kinds of commercials get watched vs. skipped, they might even be able to sell Pepsi on the idea, too, and target Coke or Pepsi sounds as determined by the statistical data.
ufo4sale
12-14-2006, 10:25 PM
People just think everything should be free...
Maybe we should raise taxes so everyone ELSES TiVo service will be free....
Hmmmm...the page that comes up went from 2 lines (Keep or Delete) to 3 lines.
Nobody would ever HAVE to view the 3rd line option...ever...but human nature makes us curious and that is why it is ingenious.
I can't stand complainers that complain about things that are completely optional.
+1
Downidb
12-14-2006, 11:56 PM
For those of you who want to see a REAL intrusive ad, check out this screenshot from the Comcast DVR (assuming I can load an image properly). They added the advertisement at the bottom of the guide, removing a line of channel info. Also, if I was on channel 158 and wanted to scroll down to 159 (or vice versa), I'd have to click past the banner.
Sure, I'm not thrilled about the TiVo ad, but it doesn't change how I watch TV or use the guide. The Comcast ad completely changed how I navigate around the guide. My question is will Comcast lose the ad (and the revenue) for those of us who plan to buy the TiVo software on the Comcast box? I'll probably wait to find out that answer before I decide to move to an S3 or not.Comcast DVR.jpg
Stormspace
12-15-2006, 08:39 AM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spotlight_(logical_fallacy)
Thank you. I had always wondered about the logic behind this. However there was one line in the reference that makes me wonder still.
Online and call-in polls are particularly at risk of this error, because the respondents are self-selected. At best, this means the people who care most about an issue will answer;
This would seem to indicate that the self selected poll while not being a random sampling isn't that bad nor should it be dismissed.
at worst, people listening to a particular radio host, or on a political mailing list, flood the poll.
In this case we really aren't being influenced by anyone, we are just expressing our opinion. This isn't anyone else's opinion so to me it would suggest that the former "best" situation would apply.
Also, unlike other forums this one is made up almost entirely by owners of TiVo equipment. This means that we are mature adults and not some group of adolescent fanboys complaining about realism in video games. This would further support that the TCF forum shows a more accurate snapshot of user opinion than other forums on the web. While not being as accurate as a random sampling of course it should hardly be dismissed as fanboy grumbling.
Stormspace
12-15-2006, 08:47 AM
For those of you who want to see a REAL intrusive ad, check out this screenshot from the Comcast DVR (assuming I can load an image properly). They added the advertisement at the bottom of the guide, removing a line of channel info. Also, if I was on channel 158 and wanted to scroll down to 159 (or vice versa), I'd have to click past the banner.
Sure, I'm not thrilled about the TiVo ad, but it doesn't change how I watch TV or use the guide. The Comcast ad completely changed how I navigate around the guide. My question is will Comcast lose the ad (and the revenue) for those of us who plan to buy the TiVo software on the Comcast box? I'll probably wait to find out that answer before I decide to move to an S3 or not.Comcast DVR.jpg
Ads advertising upcoming shows don't really bother me, now if it had been an ad for viagra... :)
Frankenstien
12-15-2006, 09:50 AM
I saw the Weather Channel Ad at the end of CSI NY. I think its well done. I checked out the ad for fun. Since the default option is the same as it was before its pretty easy to ignore the advertisement if you want to.
Stormspace
12-15-2006, 11:56 AM
I saw the Weather Channel Ad at the end of CSI NY. I think its well done. I checked out the ad for fun. Since the default option is the same as it was before its pretty easy to ignore the advertisement if you want to.
My wife saw this one last night and asked if we could opt out of these service updates since they are always slowing down the TiVo. :)
Generally I don't talk technology to her since frankly she's not interested, so she knows nothing about all the issues with 7.3.1 other than what she has seen. I think of her as my normal user, to her I'm tech support. So I find it interesting that a normal user would think such a thing, especially when it's one that doesn't post here. :rolleyes:
Stu_Bee
12-15-2006, 12:04 PM
How about Tivo offers 2 Plans:
1 - Monthly fee, no ads
2 - No monthly fee (free) & have-to-watch ads (no FF) at the beginning of each recording.
Y-ASK
12-15-2006, 12:33 PM
My wife saw this one last night and asked if we could opt out of these service updates since they are always slowing down the TiVo. :)
Generally I don't talk technology to her since frankly she's not interested, so she knows nothing about all the issues with 7.3.1 other than what she has seen. I think of her as my normal user, to her I'm tech support. So I find it interesting that a normal user would think such a thing, especially when it's one that doesn't post here. :rolleyes:
So when she said "opt out of these service updates" was she refering to the ad that she just saw or the slow down 7.3.1 Kidzone issue? You mention both in your 1st sentence so I'm just looking for clarification on what the "normal" user meant :).
This is entirely a principle issue for me. I've been able to ignore the yellow star and I'm glad I havn't seen any more of the pop-up ads. I'm sure I'll just ignore this one too but I would prefer that my monthly fee be put towards making my Tivo better with excellent new features, not put towards paying programmers to include this crap as part of my system. If Tivo can't turn a profit from the millions of subs they have right now then they are spending too much on something they shouldn't be wasting money on.
Y-ASK
ZeoTiVo
12-15-2006, 01:13 PM
So no one has actually made any effort to let TiVo know they dislike this other than to post here? My conclusions stand then.
Y-ASK
12-15-2006, 01:22 PM
So no one has actually made any effort to let TiVo know they dislike this other than to post here? My conclusions stand then.
Well, when I saw Tom Rogers at the golf course yesterday I talked to him briefly about it. Does that count? :eek:
Y-ASK
Atomike
12-15-2006, 01:26 PM
So no one has actually made any effort to let TiVo know they dislike this other than to post here? My conclusions stand then.
In your mind, perhaps.
However, in reality you may be troubled to find that a lack of response does not logically prove a universal negative statement.
Sorry.
To sound rational, it helps if conclusions are derived validly.
So no one has actually made any effort to let TiVo know they dislike this other than to post here? My conclusions stand then.
I'd argue that this is the best possible venue to on which voice our opinions because I'm quite sure TiVo does read and note the comments here and prospective new customers also do (Google TiVo and a link to this forum is near the top of the list) a fact that I'm sure isn't lost on TiVo at a time when they are trying to increase their customer base.
ZeoTiVo
12-15-2006, 01:55 PM
In your mind, perhaps.
However, in reality you may be troubled to find that a lack of response does not logically prove a universal negative statement.
Sorry.
To sound rational, it helps if conclusions are derived validly.
OK then - lets check this for rational thought
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
no change in the response and no change in the next result. Seems rational to me that if you really, truly want to change the ad thing on TiVo you need to change the response to something more effectual. If none of you really want to change the response, then none of you really see a problem in the results from TiVo and just irrationally post complaints each time an ad feature comes out
Stu_Bee
12-15-2006, 01:59 PM
zeo,
I think you failed to take into account what MIGHT have happened if no-one 'decried' the prior commercial insertions. Maybe Tivo would have taken that to be a sign that no-one cared and inundated us with all types of ad's.
As it is, maybe their current ad's are a compromise between what they really want to do, and what the user base here is willing to accept (to difft degrees)
ZeoTiVo
12-15-2006, 01:59 PM
I'd argue that this is the best possible venue to on which voice our opinions because I'm quite sure TiVo does read and note the comments here and prospective new customers also do (Google TiVo and a link to this forum is near the top of the list) a fact that I'm sure isn't lost on TiVo at a time when they are trying to increase their customer base.
in other words - ads on TiVo are not going away simply because you post complaints of such in this forum.
Billy66
12-15-2006, 02:14 PM
And the complaints aren't going away simply because you don't share in them Zeo.
OK then - lets check this for rational thought
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
no change in the response and no change in the next result.
And you define a slippery slope how?
ZeoTiVo
12-15-2006, 02:26 PM
And the complaints aren't going away simply because you don't share in them Zeo.
Fine by me- I have been on TiVo forum long enough and people have told me to stop posting a few times that I would not tell someone to stop posting simply because I disagree. That means however I also get the right to point out irrationality of said posts.
I am simply challenging any and all who feel the ads are a a slippery slope (and despite new features around them - I do not see a slippery slope because they do not make me change how I use my DVR) to actually do something meaningful about and got the expected result of people just complaining about me as well instead of listing any action other than complaining here they have taken.
Billy66
12-15-2006, 02:39 PM
Zeo, where you lose it though is not everything is a "gots to go" situation. People complain. I complain to my employees, I don't necessarily fire them right away. If they are solid and start to act goofy, I complain about it to them, I counsel them. They lose a little good will, but it isn't an empty or full situation.
Wives get angry at husbands and they complain, they don't simply walk out to show they are serious. If the complaints go unanswered for a long time, if they get worse, it may lead to that.
Your everything or nothing logic is almost laughable.
ZeoTiVo
12-15-2006, 02:44 PM
Zeo, where you lose it though is not everything is a "gots to go" situation. People complain. I complain to my employees, I don't necessarily fire them right away. If they are solid and start to act goofy, I complain about it to them, I counsel them. They lose a little good will, but it isn't an empty or full situation.
Wives get angry at husbands and they complain, they don't simply walk out to show they are serious. If the complaints go unanswered for a long time, if they get worse, it may lead to that.
Your everything or nothing logic is almost laughable.
has your employee done the same thing for 5 years despite repeated attempts to make him stop. Would you consider the repeated attempts effective and worth your time or would you look for a different strategey. It is just as telling to me that no one has mentioned any other kind of action that might be effective but just more complaining posts.
Billy66
12-15-2006, 02:55 PM
has your employee done the same thing for 5 years despite repeated attempts to make him stop. Would you consider the repeated attempts effective and worth your time or would you look for a different strategey. It is just as telling to me that no one has mentioned any other kind of action that might be effective but just more complaining posts.
At this point Zeo, I think this employee is closer to being fired by the posters in this thread than he/she has ever been in the past. The employee will have an idea that the axe is falling when the same behavior is not met with compliants or counseling. At that point, the time for talking is over.
We're not there yet. I'm sure many who aren't in this thread are past that point.
I think we believe that this employee, if left alone for the last five years, would be way worse, perhaps intolerable. With every step some wonder if now is the time to fire him/her or not. We read your advice, "go now". Maybe you would do that, maybe you wouldn't.
MickeS
12-15-2006, 03:32 PM
I saw this again last night at the end of "The Office".
Looks like this might become pretty common, and it makes sense to me - it's the perfect place to put an ad. It doesn't take any extra time or effort to use the TiVo in the same manner as before the ad, and it's a place where everyone who watches a show (well everyone who watches a show until the end) will see it. Well, unless you did like me last night - I exited the screen so fast I don't know what the ad was for. :)
dswallow
12-15-2006, 03:43 PM
I saw this again last night at the end of "The Office".
Looks like this might become pretty common, and it makes sense to me - it's the perfect place to put an ad. It doesn't take any extra time or effort to use the TiVo in the same manner as before the ad, and it's a place where everyone who watches a show (well everyone who watches a show until the end) will see it. Well, unless you did like me last night - I exited the screen so fast I don't know what the ad was for. :)
I automatically pad 2 minutes before and 5 minutes after, so generally the only time I would never see that screen is when I wasn't at the TV to stop the playback once the show was over.
Fortunately TiVo isn't currently allowed to pollute my HR10-250's with such things. ;)
drew2k
12-15-2006, 03:49 PM
I saw this again last night at the end of "The Office".
Looks like this might become pretty common, and it makes sense to me - it's the perfect place to put an ad. It doesn't take any extra time or effort to use the TiVo in the same manner as before the ad, and it's a place where everyone who watches a show (well everyone who watches a show until the end) will see it. Well, unless you did like me last night - I exited the screen so fast I don't know what the ad was for. :)It's cool that it barely registered with you as you exited your program...
Now, what if enough people activate the ads that TiVo, Inc. decides it's worthwhile to put ads in more places. At the bottom of every menu page, for example. Doesn't change how anyone uses their TiVo DVR, so why not?
How about if they put ads at the end of your Wishlist search results page?
When is enough enough, and too much, too much?
(MickeS - I'm not directing these questions at you, you're post just served as a good jumping-in point! :))
So no one has actually made any effort to let TiVo know they dislike this other than to post here? My conclusions stand then.
What about an online petition? ;)
-smak-
Dennis Wilkinson
12-15-2006, 04:45 PM
At best, this means the people who care most about an issue will answer[/b]This would seem to indicate that the self selected poll while not being a random sampling isn't that bad nor should it be dismissed.
That's exactly what limits their usefulness -- in the best case, only those with strong opinions on the issue reply to the poll, which tells you absolutely squat about the population you're interested in (many of which may not hold a strong opinion.) On the 'net today, with things like digg/Slashdot/reddit/crosslinked blogs and so on, your sample population is even more likely to be polluted, by people who are completely outside the population you're interested in responding. In this case, you're not interested in seeing how "people who care most about the issue" respond, you're interested in seeing how "people who are affected by the issue" respond. Two potentially very different sample populations.
That's not to say that they don't provide any data at all, just that it's not terribly useful because you don't really know the question you got an answer to, because your sample population is poorly defined.
MickeS
12-15-2006, 04:54 PM
It's cool that it barely registered with you as you exited your program...
Now, what if enough people activate the ads that TiVo, Inc. decides it's worthwhile to put ads in more places. At the bottom of every menu page, for example. Doesn't change how anyone uses their TiVo DVR, so why not?
How about if they put ads at the end of your Wishlist search results page?
When is enough enough, and too much, too much?
(MickeS - I'm not directing these questions at you, you're post just served as a good jumping-in point! :))
My answer to these questions is in a previous post in this thread. ;)
I don't care where they put ads, as long as I don't have to do anything to avoid them (like those annoying "Skip this ad" things on websites). SInce TiVo isn't using the entire screen for their menus, they might as well put some banner ads on the menus, as far as I'm concerned.
Atomike
12-15-2006, 05:03 PM
OK then - lets check this for rational thought
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
TiVo puts out a new ad feature - threads are started to decry it as evil and a slippery slope
no change in the response and no change in the next result.
You are looking at Tivo history with a VERY selective memory.
Remember when Tivo toyed with placing ads during the fast-forward process? The overlaying ads disaster - remember that? It wasn't that long ago. Anyway, what happened? Outcry. It started here, and ended up being everywhere. What happened after that? Tivo started peeing down its leg, and gave up on the idea. Don't argue about a slippery slope. The slippery slope already happened - but was reversed by continual whining. The exact type of whining happening now - which is a perfectly valid response to Corporate incompetence. All we want is for Tivo to leave our boxes alone. No more ads. I want TV my way - not Tivo's client's way.
Stormspace
12-15-2006, 05:05 PM
So when she said "opt out of these service updates" was she refering to the ad that she just saw or the slow down 7.3.1 Kidzone issue? You mention both in your 1st sentence so I'm just looking for clarification on what the "normal" user meant :).
This is entirely a principle issue for me. I've been able to ignore the yellow star and I'm glad I havn't seen any more of the pop-up ads. I'm sure I'll just ignore this one too but I would prefer that my monthly fee be put towards making my Tivo better with excellent new features, not put towards paying programmers to include this crap as part of my system. If Tivo can't turn a profit from the millions of subs they have right now then they are spending too much on something they shouldn't be wasting money on.
Y-ASK
I paraphrased what she said. She has no idea what the difference between the KidZone update and updates to include more ads. She just wanted to know if we could opt out of future software changes now that our TiVo's were working correctly.
Stormspace
12-15-2006, 05:14 PM
My answer to these questions is in a previous post in this thread. ;)
I don't care where they put ads, as long as I don't have to do anything to avoid them (like those annoying "Skip this ad" things on websites). SInce TiVo isn't using the entire screen for their menus, they might as well put some banner ads on the menus, as far as I'm concerned.
How about changing up the wallpaper now and again. Coke themed TiVo's or some god awful drug ad. :rolleyes:
TiVoEvan74
12-15-2006, 05:14 PM
Off topic... (but then this thread has run 8 pages)
I noticed a comment about padding every show before and after... while I know people who did that with their video tapes because they're clocks were always off... I don't understand it with TiVo! Please enlighten me!
We couldn't do it because too many of the shows we record are back to back and we'd hate to jump around.
On Topic....
let's see what happens with the next round of ads... we haven't noticed this yet, I was among those who were worried about the slippery slope-- and the potential intrusiveness of the ads at the end of the show... but given the screen shot here, either the whining worked, or the scope wasn't that great to start with... there didn't even seem to be an ad in the background, right? I think I can ignore the ad banner...
So I withdraw my intrusiveness concerns... for now!
Stormspace
12-15-2006, 05:16 PM
Off topic... (but then this thread has run 8 pages)
I noticed a comment about padding every show before and after... while I know people who did that with their video tapes because they're clocks were always off... I don't understand it with TiVo! Please enlighten me!
We couldn't do it because too many of the shows we record are back to back and we'd hate to jump around.
On Topic....
let's see what happens with the next round of ads... we haven't noticed this yet, I was among those who were worried about the slippery slope-- and the potential intrusiveness of the ads at the end of the show... but given the screen shot here, either the whining worked, or the scope wasn't that great to start with... there didn't even seem to be an ad in the background, right? I think I can ignore the ad banner...
So I withdraw my intrusiveness concerns... for now!
It's not as bad if you have a dual tuner unit. The reason to so it is that many networks intentionally run shows early or late without any advance warning. I guess he does it to take that into account and so he doesn't have to worry if it happens.
Sadara
12-15-2006, 05:33 PM
Interesting discussion, I'll only say I've seen them on at least a few of my shows now and I haven't been bothered by them at all. I haven't actually clicked on one yet either, but they also haven't bothered me. If Tivo can make a revenue stream out of it, I have no problem with that. If I have to read the damn thing before I can do anything else on my Tivo, then I'll have a problem with it.
My goodness! Eight pages? Petitions? The ad doesn't affect the "delete process" at all.
My goodness! Eight pages? Petitions? The ad doesn't affect the "delete process" at all.
An ad for the "Purple Pill" plastered across the side of your car wouldn't affect its driveability either but I bet you wouldn't stand for it.
An ad for the "Purple Pill" plastered across the side of your car wouldn't affect its driveability either but I bet you wouldn't stand for it.
That is a highly exaggerated and unlikely scenario and you know it. I don't drive my "delete this program?" menu around.
Dennis Wilkinson
12-15-2006, 06:41 PM
You are looking at Tivo history with a VERY selective memory.
Remember when Tivo toyed with placing ads during the fast-forward process? The overlaying ads disaster - remember that?
I don't believe that those are gone, although I haven't seen one myself recently (I'm a 30-second-skip guy). The biggest issue with those, though, and what caused TiVo to turn them off (temporarily or permanently, I don't recall) was that there was a bug that in some instances prevented the overlay ad from going away and causing it to overlap with actual program content, which justifiably triggered a lot of complaints. Not that they wouldn't have triggered complaints in the absence of the bug, of course, since it's pretty clear that some people don't want to see any advertising at all on their TiVos, regardless of how innocuous that advertising may or may not be.
Personally, none of the advertising that TiVo has done so far, with the exception of the attempt at PTCM ads several years ago, have really bothered me. They don't affect the usability of the box and are pretty easy for me to ignore (unlike some of the advertising I've seen on Comcast's cable boxes, for example.)
mergy
12-15-2006, 06:42 PM
That is a highly exaggerated and unlikely scenario and you know it. I don't drive my "delete this program?" menu around.
This is not acceptable. The tivo ads are BS. I am a lifetime plan on Tivo 2. I have referred tons of people to tivo but that ends now after I saw this crap last night on my tivo box.
Time to finally get off my butt and explore mythTV now that mythdora has made such a breakthrough.
http://swik.net/MythDora
dswallow
12-15-2006, 06:49 PM
Off topic... (but then this thread has run 8 pages)
I noticed a comment about padding every show before and after... while I know people who did that with their video tapes because they're clocks were always off... I don't understand it with TiVo! Please enlighten me!
I use the "EndPad Plus" hack on my units that lets me set a soft padding for before and after each program. It won't affect the recording when there are back-to-back scheduled recordings, but if it can, it'll start the recording early and/or end it late according to the settings. And I have 3 HR10-250's so that's 6 tuners total, allowing me to spread recordings around a bit such that there aren't all that many back-to-back recordings to worry about.
Primarily it's because of the tendency these days for networks to either have 2 shows run into each other with no typical commercial break inbetween, and how they often end up running and unscheduled 1 or 2 minutes later for some reason.
This is not acceptable. The tivo ads are BS. I am a lifetime plan on Tivo 2. I have referred tons of people to tivo but that ends now after I saw this crap last night on my tivo box.
Yes, I have a lifetime S2 as well. I also have a DT, and a Humax. I've bought TiVos for family as gifts. Referred others to it more than once.
Companies are always sneaking promotions into things, especially when it's a service. I don't understand why people are so specifically offended by ads they can ignore on their TiVo. It's a petty complaint.
dswallow
12-15-2006, 06:52 PM
Yes, I have a lifetime S2 as well. I also have a DT, and a Humax. I've bought TiVos for family as gifts. Referred others to it more than once.
Companies are always sneaking promotions into things, especially when it's a service. I don't understand why people are so specifically offended by ads they can ignore on their TiVo. It's a petty complaint.
Most promotions that are "snuck in" can be thrown away and never seen again. This is like someone you invited into your own leaving a continuous trail of litter in your living room. Even though it goes away on its own, it's still there, you still see it, and you can't do anything about it.
Most promotions that are "snuck in" can be thrown away and never seen again. This is like someone you invited into your own leaving a continuous trail of litter in your living room. Even though it goes away on its own, it's still there, you still see it, and you can't do anything about it.
I suppose it simply depends on the person. I'm extremely neat and organized, but I have never thought of promos on TiVo as litter in my living room. It just seems so insignificant, you have to be a real fuss to care.
I would also assume anyone who is raging about a silly block of text doesn't much care for their TiVo. I hate to bring this point up again, but it is after all a chunk of TiVo's income.
dswallow
12-15-2006, 06:59 PM
I hate to bring this point up again, but it is after all a chunk of TiVo's income.
Much like the crumbs left in the bottom of a bag of cookies once you've eaten all the cookies.
Negligible, and pretty much everyone expects it to be thrown away.
I would also assume anyone who is raging about a silly block of text doesn't much care for their TiVo.
You'd be quite wrong.
Much like the crumbs left in the bottom of a bag of cookies once you've eaten all the cookies.
Negligible, and pretty much everyone expects it to be thrown away.
Okay, then lets just focus on the other point. It's obnoxious to be so outraged. :)
You'd be quite wrong.
I like my TiVos for what they are. I don't shun them for their flaws.
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.