1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Revolution - The Dark Tower 6/3/2013

Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by RickStrobel, Jun 3, 2013.

  1. pmyers

    pmyers Well-Known Member

    Jan 4, 2001
    Gilbert, AZ
    I'm not sure where I assumed sudden death. I think it was during the conversation with the lady with the journal. My impression was of all these people with nanites in them just spontaneiously dropping like flies.
  2. Anubys

    Anubys All About Footwork

    Jul 16, 2004
    That was the impression I got as well. Not saying it made sense, but that's how I felt the writers wanted it conveyed. I just chalked it up as another joke in this comedy show! ;)
  3. RickStrobel

    RickStrobel Well-Known Member

    Jan 19, 2000
    If cancer-lady will die when the power goes back on - how was she living before it went off?
  4. pmyers

    pmyers Well-Known Member

    Jan 4, 2001
    Gilbert, AZ
    Ok...well at least I know I'm not the only one!
  5. DevdogAZ

    DevdogAZ Give em Hell, Devils

    Apr 16, 2003
    Again, nobody said she was going to die the second the power comes back on. She probably had terminal cancer before the power went off. Something about the combination of the nanites, the power being off, and the flashing device must be keeping those cancer cells at bay. Rachel and the Dr. lady seem to believe that if the power goes back on, whatever is keeping the cancer cells at bay would no longer be effective and cancer lady would get sick again and would again be terminal.

    Let's remember that Danny, and presumably cancer lady, were going to die 15 years earlier without the intervention of the nanites and the flashing device. So it's not that the power going back on is going to kill them. It's simply going to remove the thing that is keeping them alive.
  6. morac

    morac Cat God

    Mar 14, 2003
    Presumably the same way she was when we saw her, with the nanites constantly healing her. The way it was explained was that there was no way to power off only the nanites draining the power, so all nanites would be shut off, including the healing ones.
  7. Polcamilla

    Polcamilla -b±√(b^2 - 4ac)/2a

    Nov 7, 2001
    Either I missed a pretty critical history lecture or you can.
  8. Ereth

    Ereth Unemployed Bum

    Jun 16, 2000
    Didn't you know that everything on TV is real.. somewhere?

    Waaaaay back in the 1960s there was a Superboy story where it was revealed that aliens had set up cameras around Smallville and were broadcasting "The Adventures of Superboy" as if it were a programmed drama. The fact that it was real was not revealed to the audience, who loved it. High rated show.

    Except that one day they had a focus group and the focus group revealed that the audience thought Ma and Pa Kent were too old, and should be replaced with younger actors. Well, since they were real people simply being photographed on another planet, this was quite the conundrum for the TV producers. So they thought and they thought and they had the idea to spike the Kent farm family well with a rejuvenation drug that would make Ma and Pa Kent much younger, though still old enough to be Superboys parents, and they did that and Superboy got younger parents and TV ratings were never higher.

    I'm not making any of this up. So, clearly, what WE are watching on TV is from another planet, too, and in this case, it's a planet of particularly stupid people, but no, you can't make this up! Really, you can't.

    What's more logical? A bunch of stupid writers or a whole planet of stupid people?

  9. Rob Helmerichs

    Rob Helmerichs I am Groot! TCF Club

    Oct 17, 2000
    Why does it have to be either/or? There's ample evidence for both right here on Earth...
  10. trainman

    trainman Nice to see you

    Jan 29, 2001
    Dave Barry once opined that aliens were watching our TV shows, and particularly stupid TV commercials (what he cited were the Wisk "ring around the collar" ads) were actually the aliens' favorite part of the programming, and were the only thing keeping them from vaporizing Earth.
  11. PotentiallyCoherent

    PotentiallyCoherent Member

    Jul 25, 2002
    Um, it was a way to extend the Clark's lifetime believably. Didn't you notice that the Clarks continued to be "young" into the future weeks as you read the comic?
  12. Ereth

    Ereth Unemployed Bum

    Jun 16, 2000
    The Kents, and yes, absolutely. It was a plot device to keep Ma and Pa Kent around in the Superboy comic book. Because, you know, they'd been aging so naturally up to that. Superman being a full grown adult in 1938 and a youth in Smallville in 1965 doesn't seem to have been a problem for the writers, so the Kents being old wasn't REALLY a problem. But someone decided it was, so they wrote a story to solve it.

    Doesn't mean it's not worth making fun of. :) "The Super Hypnotist of Metropolis" was an attempt to explain why nobody thought Clark looked like Superman but with glasses, but it was so awful that it was almost universally ignored as an "imaginary issue" within only a few issues of appearing, even though it was actually a rather clever idea.

Share This Page