1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Price is Right - OAD 4/25/2013

Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by BradJW, Apr 26, 2013.

  1. BradJW

    BradJW Well-Known Member

    5,876
    54
    Jun 9, 2008
    Houston
  2. BradJW

    BradJW Well-Known Member

    5,876
    54
    Jun 9, 2008
    Houston
    And apparently today, they're playing Plinko for for $500K
     
  3. ElJay

    ElJay Active Member

    2,087
    1
    Apr 6, 2005
  4. That Don Guy

    That Don Guy Now with more GB

    2,907
    0
    Mar 13, 2003
    Benicia, CA
    This was "Price is Right Big Money Week" - each day, there would be a game played for at least $100,000:
    Monday - Punch-A-Bunch for $250,000
    Tuesday - Grand Game for $100,000
    Wednesday - Pay the Rent (unchanged, as it's normally for $100,000 anyway)
    Thursday - 3 Strikes for a $280,000 Ferrari
    Friday - Plinko for $500,000

    A couple of trivia notes:

    Before this week, the only prize worth more than $100,000 ever offered on the daytime version of the show was a Tesla car on an Earth Day episode (I think it was 2011 - instead of Golden Road, it was called Green Road that day).

    There's a reason 3 Strikes is played for expensive cars; using the "3 strikes in the bag" rule (as opposed to the "1 strike in the bag, which goes back in when it is pulled out" rule they had for Bob Barker's last few years on the show), with a 6-digit car, your chance of winning if you were told the price of the car in advance would still only be 1/3.
    (If you know the price, then any chip that is pulled would be removed, so it is a matter of getting the 6 digits before the 3 strikes; this is the same as pulling out all of the chips and winning if the last chip was a strike (since the numbers came out first) or losing if the last chip was a number (since the strikes came out first), and since each chip has an equal chance of being last, the chance of winning is 3 (strikes) out of 9 (chips).)
     
  5. marksman

    marksman ID-10-T

    16,781
    0
    Mar 4, 2002
    I saw the day when the girl one 100k in one game and won like 122k overall. At least the last ten minutes of it.
     
  6. Turtleboy

    Turtleboy Well-Known Member TCF Club

    53,031
    180
    Mar 24, 2001
    Ft. Lauderdale
    If you win the Ferrari do they give you the money to pay the $75,000 of federal income taxes on it (plus whatever state taxes are)?
     
  7. kcarl75

    kcarl75 Member

    793
    0
    Oct 23, 2002
    Southern NH
    Nope.
     
  8. That Don Guy

    That Don Guy Now with more GB

    2,907
    0
    Mar 13, 2003
    Benicia, CA
    Not only that, but there's a reason they like to give away a lot of trips at once (for example, frequently you will see a showcase that consists only of three trips); there's little chance that the winner will take them all, considering:
    (a) Any trip they do take, they have to pay tax on the listed amount (airfare and hotel);
    (b) There is a time limit - usually, a year - in which the trip can be taken (this is especially troublesome as far as the winner is concerned with cruises, since there are very few sailing dates in the allowable period);
    (c) You can't sell the trip to anybody else - in fact, I'm not sure you can even give it away (e.g. to your parents as an anniversary gift); there might be a rule that says the winner has to be one of the persons on the trip.

    Note that the winner does have the option to decline any prize, but they don't get anything in exchange for it. (Also, if you win a car, or any other "physical prize" for that matter, you can sell it to anybody you want.)
     
  9. mattack

    mattack Active Member

    20,750
    4
    Apr 9, 2001
    sunnyvale
    Interesting, I definitely remember other things (I *thought* game shows, but maybe just contests) talking about "or cash value" in exchange for a prize.
     
  10. Alfer

    Alfer New Member

    32,421
    0
    Aug 7, 2003
    Interesting article from ABC News:

     
  11. mattack

    mattack Active Member

    20,750
    4
    Apr 9, 2001
    sunnyvale
    Apple doesn't ship their items?!?!?!?! SAY WHAT?
     
  12. efilippi

    efilippi Active Member

    5,436
    2
    Jul 24, 2001
    Mundelein, Il
    Interesting that ABC News had to include that old chestnut about tax brackets: "and the income might be enough to lift you into a higher tax bracket, further increasing the cost of your good fortune." Makes one wonder if the rest of the article makes any sense as well.
     
  13. ElJay

    ElJay Active Member

    2,087
    1
    Apr 6, 2005
    Right, because your taxes owed retroactively increase when you make $0.01 beyond the highest bracket you were previously in. :rolleyes:
     
  14. Turtleboy

    Turtleboy Well-Known Member TCF Club

    53,031
    180
    Mar 24, 2001
    Ft. Lauderdale
    It's not about the retroactivity, but the marginal rates.

    But this is the one situation in which putting you in a higher tax bracket could cost you more money - because you're not receiving money, but payment in kind.
     
  15. efilippi

    efilippi Active Member

    5,436
    2
    Jul 24, 2001
    Mundelein, Il
    Sorry TB, but I don't get what you are saying at all. The higher bracket would indeed increase the cost to the recipient over what it would have been if the bracket were lower but that's not what the ABC piece is talking about.
     
  16. HoosierFan

    HoosierFan Board game geek

    827
    0
    May 8, 2001
    North...
    But it would cause the rest of your earnings, like your wages, and any additional income to be taxed at a higher rate.
     
  17. DevdogAZ

    DevdogAZ Give em Hell, Devils

    47,785
    140
    Apr 16, 2003
    Arizona
    Not true. When you earn additional money that puts you into the next bracket, only that additional money is taxed at the increased rate. Let's say the tax bracket is 25% up to $87,850*, and the next bracket is 28%. You make $50,000 per year, but then you win a prize worth $40,000 so you suddenly have income of $90,000 that year. You're not suddenly paying 28% on all your normal wages and on the $40,000 worth of prizes. You're paying 25% on everything up to $87,850 and you'll only pay the extra 3% on $2,150.

    *Yes, I realize there are other brackets below this, but I wanted to keep my example as simple as possible.
     
  18. zordude

    zordude WDW Fan TCF Club

    12,548
    11
    Sep 23, 2003
    Malden, MA
    The crappy part is that the prize would probably cost you less than $40,000 if you bought it on the open market (assuming non-cash) and now on top of paying a higher rate of tax on part of your income, you need to also find the extra $10k in taxes you owe for the inflated value of the prize, but you haven't actually made any extra money (in this scenario).
     
  19. DevdogAZ

    DevdogAZ Give em Hell, Devils

    47,785
    140
    Apr 16, 2003
    Arizona
    Totally agree. That's why I'd always pass on the Showcase with the trips, because the retail value of them is ridiculously high. A car you can sell for some reasonable percentage of the MSRP in order to pay your taxes. A trip can't be sold so easily (and according to the post above, can't be sold at all in some cases).
     
  20. Turtleboy

    Turtleboy Well-Known Member TCF Club

    53,031
    180
    Mar 24, 2001
    Ft. Lauderdale
    Yes, I know, and I know that the ABC piece is wrong and doesn't understand marginal rates.

    I was just saying that if making more money puts you into a higher marginal bracket, then you have the money to pay it off. If winning "stuff" puts you into the higher bracket, then unless you sell the stuff, you're going to have to use your other money to pay the taxes.
     

Share This Page