1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Jeopardy: Just Noticed This

Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by waynomo, Jun 3, 2013.

  1. Jun 7, 2013 #21 of 866
    mrdbdigital

    mrdbdigital The TBS Archives TCF Club

    3,161
    3
    Feb 2, 2004
    Moultrie, GA
    Maybe that's why it's called "Double Jeopardy"? :D
     
  2. Jun 8, 2013 #22 of 866
    spartanstew

    spartanstew Thanks 4 the Update

    12,276
    131
    Feb 23, 2002
    Wylie, Texas
    This has been a frustration of mine for years. In 90% of the episodes, at least one person wagers incorrectly in FJ. Often two do it. I just don't understand it. Even in the spoilered game that Wayno posted, the third place contestant should have wagered ZERO. No reason to wager $1200 in that spot. I always thought I should approach Jeopardy about being a wagering coach for the contestants. I'll give them the wagering strategy before they go on in exchange for 5% of their winnings.

    Oh, and I'm of the belief of going for the tie, not the $1 win. I'd rather play someone I know I can probably beat (the extra $1 would garner a victory) then someone random.
     
  3. Jun 28, 2013 #23 of 866
    astrohip

    astrohip Well-Known Member TCF Club

    10,065
    41
    Jan 6, 2003
    Houston &...
    And it happened again today. Here were the stakes going into FJ:

    1st: $15,000
    2nd: $14,800
    3rd: $7,200

    All 2nd needs to do is bet $200 or more. Instead he goes all in, betting almost all of his wad. And of course, 1st bets a ton, needing to stay ahead should they both get it. 3rd bets a modest amount.

    All three miss, a triple stumper. 3rd ends up winning.

    Another game given away. Honestly, 2nd doesn't deserve to win. If you don't understand how to bet, or make an effort to learn before you play, I have no sympathy for you.
     
  4. Jun 30, 2013 #24 of 866
    waynomo

    waynomo My One Time TCF Club

    12,063
    36
    Nov 9, 2002
    Seven...
    I saw a taping about 15 years ago. The show is taped in real time till they get to Final Jeopardy. They stop taping at that point and bring out consultants to work with each contestant to figure out how much to wager. I'm not sure if the consultants suck or if they only have the leeway to make sure the contestants don't screw up big time.
     
  5. Jun 30, 2013 #25 of 866
    astrohip

    astrohip Well-Known Member TCF Club

    10,065
    41
    Jan 6, 2003
    Houston &...
    I wonder if they still do that any more. I'm active in a Jeopardy forum, where there are many former (and current!) players posting. No one has ever mentioned this. Ever.

    I'm going to guess they no longer do this.
     
  6. Jun 30, 2013 #26 of 866
    waynomo

    waynomo My One Time TCF Club

    12,063
    36
    Nov 9, 2002
    Seven...
    Please ask and let us know. I would be surprised if they didn't still do this. At the of taping, Alex Trebek came out and explained it to us. They felt it was important that the contestants didn't screw up the FJ wagering.

    (you know they tape several shows a day?) I forget if we saw 3 or 5.
     
  7. Jun 30, 2013 #27 of 866
    trainman

    trainman Nice to see you

    9,986
    11
    Jan 29, 2001
    Sherman...
    My understanding is that they're not "consultants" in the sense that they're helping the contestants with their wagering. They're just members of the production staff who are making sure that the wagers the contestants come up with make sense and are written legibly on the screen.
     
  8. Jun 30, 2013 #28 of 866
    astrohip

    astrohip Well-Known Member TCF Club

    10,065
    41
    Jan 6, 2003
    Houston &...
    Here is a reply from one of the contestants on that episode. Talk about "from the horse's mouth".:up: She was the current champion, and was in first place at FJ. She was not the one who made the bet I am referring to, that was the 2nd place contestant.

     
  9. Jun 30, 2013 #29 of 866
    vman41

    vman41 Omega Consumer

    9,324
    10
    Jun 18, 2002
    FJ has 8 permutations of correct/incorrect responses. I'd make my bet on the assumption that opponents with more money will be incorrect and bet $0 and those with less will be correct and bet all.
     
  10. Jun 30, 2013 #30 of 866
    astrohip

    astrohip Well-Known Member TCF Club

    10,065
    41
    Jan 6, 2003
    Houston &...
    I'm not sure I totally understand what you said, but nonetheless, there are accepted betting standards based on what most people do. Obviously not everyone follows common sense, and sometimes an odd betting strategy pays off. But years of study (and believe me, hard-core Jeopardy fans are nothing if not statistic oriented:rolleyes:) have shown that using certain strategies pays off for more often than not.

    One wrench can be the category, and your general feel for how you will do, versus your opponents. This is where the odd betting strategies I mentioned above can come into play.

    But hey, that's why we still play the game.
     
  11. Jul 4, 2013 #31 of 866
    waynomo

    waynomo My One Time TCF Club

    12,063
    36
    Nov 9, 2002
    Seven...
    Two contestants tied tonight! I don't think they planned it that way. I did think both bets where a tad on the unusual side though.
     
  12. Jul 4, 2013 #32 of 866
    Martha

    Martha Member

    889
    1
    Oct 6, 2002
    South Carolina
    I went back and rewatched the bets when I realized they had tied. The champion made a $1000 bet. The challenger, however, bet just enough that if the champ got it right and had doubled his money and the challenger got it right (he didn't) they would have tied as well.

    Interesting how it ended.
     
  13. Jul 4, 2013 #33 of 866
    DouglasPHill

    DouglasPHill Active Member

    1,281
    4
    Feb 10, 2005
    St Louis, MO
    I think the tie was planned.
     
  14. Jul 4, 2013 #34 of 866
    waynomo

    waynomo My One Time TCF Club

    12,063
    36
    Nov 9, 2002
    Seven...
    That would mean collusion. Can they do that?

    It certainly looks like that is what happened.
     
  15. Jul 4, 2013 #35 of 866
    DouglasPHill

    DouglasPHill Active Member

    1,281
    4
    Feb 10, 2005
    St Louis, MO
    I suspect that there is stuff going on behind the scenes that we don't know about.
     
  16. Jul 4, 2013 #36 of 866
    astrohip

    astrohip Well-Known Member TCF Club

    10,065
    41
    Jan 6, 2003
    Houston &...
    Absolutely not. Anything we don't see has no affect on the game.

    There is a studio audience, they see everything. And if you read the Jeopardy forum (jboard), it is full of former & current contestants. They give lots of behind the scene fill in the blanks, but it's all innocuous.

    Nothing goes on that isn't innocent. See my post above, #28. That's the only kind of BtS going on.
     
  17. Jul 4, 2013 #37 of 866
    MauriAnne

    MauriAnne Mostly lurking

    1,498
    1
    Sep 20, 2002
    NC
    I've often pondered something else about Final Jeopardy. I was taught to underline book titles, but I've never noticed a contestant doing that when writing their answer. Considering how many of the contestants are teachers, I find that odd that none of them would underline a book title.

    Perhaps they're told not to underline them for ease of reading? Anyone know?
     
  18. Jul 5, 2013 #38 of 866
    Worf

    Worf Active Member

    1,990
    4
    Sep 15, 2000
    Underlining book titles? I never heard of that, except maybe in a bibliography section (which I've seen a million formats for, some of which are underlined, others are italicized, etc).

    In general writing, book titles are usually just capitalized or quoted. In modern print, underlining is also considered deprecated - they much prefer bold or italics for emphasis.
     
  19. Jul 5, 2013 #39 of 866
    MauriAnne

    MauriAnne Mostly lurking

    1,498
    1
    Sep 20, 2002
    NC
    Fascinating. Just googled this and found that many methods are acceptable. Before computers, underlining was preferable since making italics was generally harder to do.

    I guess I'm showing my age. :)
     
  20. Jul 5, 2013 #40 of 866
    trainman

    trainman Nice to see you

    9,986
    11
    Jan 29, 2001
    Sherman...
    If you're nervous and have only 30 seconds[*] to write something, I have a feeling that underlining it would be the last thing on your mind. :D

    I have occasionally seen underlining (or putting movie/TV titles in quotes), but I can't point to specific examples -- you're right that it's very rare. I don't think there's a specific rule against it, though.


    [*] The contestants actually have a little longer than 30 seconds, because the pen starts working once the clue is displayed, not when the music starts. Also, they're told to write either "who" or "what" during the commercial break (and it's not ruled wrong if they forget the "is" or "are").
     

Share This Page