Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Now Playing - TV Show Talk' started by Steveknj, Mar 27, 2009.
sure. But a pic from a few months ago should be a pretty good indicator.
Exactly. There's a big difference in showing a picture from when someone is 38-39 vs. when they were 25.
I say the actress must be over 40, and all pictures must be less than a year old (yes, even if the actress is 50, we need current pictures. But 39 is OK for an actress who is 40).
They're real, and they're spectacular.
I love when we make up rules for this thread
Girl-watching for old people.
I resemble that remark
It's important stuff!
I did a quick search, and I'm surprised Laurie Holden hasn't been mentioned (Andrea from the Walking Dead)
I am glad I got a for the subject but a for the picture.
I will try harder next time.
I have been thinking Andrea on Walking Dead was pretty hot this last season. (Hello scene of her pulling up her pants!!)
Whose? Surely not Alyssa's.
When they are spectacular, who cares if they are real?
Not seeing a picture here...
I am fairly certain they are.
They are as real as Lance Armstrong is clean. A simple image search shows them further apart than natural.
<perv>Poison Ivy II has a very good scene. So does Embrace of the Vamire<\perv>
Nothing wrong with that as she looks good. She has had some work on her face too.
I believe a careful and thorough investigation is called for.
In the name of science.
While I investigated thoroughly and came to my conclusion I believe extended monitoring of the situation is in order.
I've been very busy as of late, but I will make the sacrifice and offer to do the field work. Where does she live?