We are going around in circles. I stand by my interpretation of what the 2nd Amendment says. Maybe. Or other courts. There are all sorts of ways that laws could get challenged, and with the gun manufacturer lobby/NRA lobby so strong, unfortunately, what few common sense laws get put in place probably will get challenged. And even if you can twist the 2nd Amendment to say that an individual who is not part of a militia has a constitutional right to bear arms, then you still have to determine what exactly that right entails, and what limits there are to it. All rights have limits, 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, etc.